[00:00:02]
ALL RIGHT, FOLKS, WE'RE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND GET STARTED THE JANUARY 5TH MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD IS CALLED TO ORDER EVERYONE PLEASE RISE AND FACE THE FLAG, AND IT WILL LEAD US IN THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
DON'T WE CALL THE ROLL, PLEASE? YES, MR. BOEREMA PRESENT MR. BOOTHROYD PRESENT, MR. HILL, PRESENT MS. JORDAN MS. MARAGH HAS ASKED TO BE EXCUSED MR. WARNER PRESENT MR. WEINBERG YOUR MR. KARAFFA HAS ASKED TO BE EXCUSED AND MR. RODNEY EDWARDS IS PRESIDENT AS OUR BOARD COUNSEL FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE.
THANK YOU. FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS IS THE ADOPTION OF MINUTES FROM OUR DECEMBER 1ST
[ADOPTION OF MINUTES: ]
MEETING. CAN I GET A MOTION, PLEASE? MOTION TO APPROVE DECEMBER 1ST, 2021 MEETING.SECOND FROM RICHARD, ANY DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
ALL OPPOSED. MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY.
[ANNOUNCEMENTS: ]
FOR THE BENEFIT OF EVERYONE IN ATTENDANCE, THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD IS AN ADVISORY BOARD COMPRISED OF SEVEN MEMBERS.ALL MEMBERS OF THE BOARD ARE UNPAID VOLUNTEERS APPOINTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL.
OUR PROCEDURES ARE AS FOLLOWS THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT STAFF WILL PRESENT THE STAFF REPORT FOR EACH CASE. MEMBERS WILL THEN BE ASKED IF THEY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF.
THE APPLICANT OR THEIR REPRESENTATIVE WILL THEN BE ASKED TO COME TO THE PODIUM AND PRESENT ANY INFORMATION GERMANE TO THE CASE AND TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD.
THE FLOOR WILL THEN BE OPEN FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS.
WE WILL FIRST HEAR FROM THOSE WISHING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE APPLICATION IN THOSE OPPOSED OR ALL PROCEEDINGS.
ALL APPLICANTS AND SPEAKERS FROM THE AUDIENCE MUST SIGN OATH CARDS, WHICH ARE LOCATED AT THE PODIUM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND SPEAK DIRECTLY INTO THE MICROPHONE AND STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS, FOR THE RECORD.
AS A COURTESY, I ASK THAT IF THERE IS A GROUP OF PEOPLE FROM A NEIGHBORHOOD WHO MAY HAVE SIMILAR COMMENTS, YOU INFORMALLY APPOINT A SPOKESMAN TO CLARIFY YOUR VIEWS AFTER PUBLIC COMMENTS. I WILL BRING THE CASE BACK TO THE BOARD AT THIS TIME, THE FLOOR WILL BE CLOSED AND NO FURTHER COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC WILL BE HEARD.
I WILL THEN CALL FOR A MOTION AND A SECOND AT WHICH TIME THE BOARD MAY HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS OR FURTHER DISCUSSION.
DECISIONS OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD ARE THEN FORWARDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL DISPOSITION.
THANK YOU FOR ATTENDING AND FOR YOUR COOPERATION.
AND JUST FOR FOR YOUR INFORMATION.
ALL THE CASES ON ON THE AGENDA TONIGHT WILL BE HEARD BY CITY COUNCIL ON FEBRUARY 3RD.
EXCEPT FOR CASE NUMBER EIGHT UNDER NEW BUSINESS THAT WILL BE HEARD ON FEBRUARY 17TH.
OUR FIRST CASE, PLEASE, PATRICK.
BEFORE WE GET INTO THE FIRST CASE, I WANTED TO INTRODUCE OUR NEW GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR, ALEXANDRA BERNARD.
SHE STARTED LATER THIS MONTH, AND SHE WANTS TO JUST SAY HELLO TO THE BOARD.
HMM. GOOD EVENING, I'M ALEX BERNARD, AND I'VE JUST BEEN HIRED ON THE CITY OF PALM BAY AS THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR, AND I LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH YOU GUYS IN THE FUTURE AND BRINGING SOME GREAT CASES BEFORE YOU AND DOING ALL THE GREAT WORK.
SO I JUST WANTED TO SAY HELLO AND I'VE BEEN WITH THE CITY FOR ABOUT A MONTH NOW.
JUST DECEMBER SIX WAS MY FIRST DAY, SO.
THANK YOU, ALEX, AND WELCOME, THANK YOU.
[OLD/UNFINISHED BUSINESS: ]
A PATRICK, I FIRST CASE, PLEASE.ALL RIGHT. FIRST CASE UNDER THE AGENDA IS UNDER OLD AND UNFINISHED BUSINESS CASE Z 54, 20 21. BACKGROUND SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF DIXIE HIGHWAY IN ENGLISH DRIVE, APPROXIMATELY SEVEN HUNDRED FEET SOUTH OF THE TURKEY CREEK.
SPECIFICALLY, A PROPERTY IS LOTS 10 AND 11 OF THE HOBSONS SUBDIVISION, LOCATED IN SECTION 24 TOWNSHIP, 28 SOUTH RANGE, THIRTY SEVEN EAST OF BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA.
SUBJECT PARCELS APPROXIMATELY ZERO POINT THREE FOUR ACRES PROPERTY OWNER RECEIVED APPROVAL FROM CITY COUNCIL TO AMEND THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM COMMERCIAL USE BAYFRONT MIXED USE VILLAGE BY WAY OF ORDINANCE 2015 DASH 50.
HOWEVER, THE COMPANION REZONING APPLICATION WAS WITHDRAWN.
THE APPLICANT'S ALFRED AND MARINE AGUIRRE ARE NOW SEEKING TO REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM H.C. HIUI COMMERCIAL, THE BAYFRONT MIXED USE VILLAGE ZONING DISTRICT ANALYSIS.
ALL ANALYSIS IS FOR CHAPTER 185 ZONING CODE SECTION ONE EIGHTY FIVE POINT TWO ZERO ONE.
SEE WHICH STATES THAT ALL PROPOSED AMENDMENT SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD SHALL STUDY SUCH PROPOSAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH ITEMS ONE THROUGH FOUR OF SECTION ONE EIGHTY FIVE POINT TWO ZERO ONE.
[00:05:01]
NEED AND JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CHANGE.THE AFGHAN STATES THAT THE JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE IS TO ALLOW FOR THE POSSIBLE FUTURE USE OF RESIDENTIAL ON THE PROPERTY, BOEREMA ZONING DISTRICT PERMITS RANGE OF LOWER INTENSITY COMMERCIAL USES AS WELL AS SINGLE AND MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT.
THE MAXIMUM DENSITY OF 10 UNITS PER ACRE.
THIS DISTRICT ALSO ALLOWS FOR REDUCED SETBACKS, WHICH PROVIDE FOR MORE FLEXIBILITY IN DEVELOPING A SMALL PARCEL.
TWO, ONE PERTAINING TO THE REZONING OF LAND, THE EFFECT OF THE CHANGE, IF ANY, ON THEIR PARTICULAR PROPERTY AND ON SURROUNDING PROPERTIES.
REZONING OF THIS PARCEL TO BE A MOVIE WOULD HAVE MINIMAL EFFECT TO THE SURROUNDING AREA AS A SUBJECT PROPERTY IS BORDERED BY ROADS ON THREE SIDES AND THE PROPERTY ABUTTING TO THE SOUTH IS CURRENTLY ZONED BMV.
ANY DEVELOPMENT TO OCCUR ON SITE MUST BE APPROVED VIA ADMINISTRATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW TO ENSURE THAT DEVELOPMENT ADHERES TO THE PALM BAY CODE OF ORDINANCES AND ALL OTHER APPLICABLE REGULATIONS.
THREE, WHEN PERTAINING TO THE REZONING OF LAND, THE AMOUNT OF UNDEVELOPED LAND IN THE GENERAL AREA AND IN THE CITY HAVING THE SAME CLASSIFICATION AS THAT REQUESTED.
MOVIE ZONING EXISTS FROM THE NORTH SIDE OF TURKEY CREEK TO KIRKLAND ROAD, MOSTLY BETWEEN THE RAILROAD AND U.S. HIGHWAY ONE.
A HANDFUL OF B-MOVIES OWNED PARCELS EXIST EAST OF U.S.
ROUGHLY SEVENTY FIVE PERCENT OF THE LAND ZONED B-MOVIE IS DEVELOPED.
I AM FOR THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE PURPOSE OF THE CITY PLAN FOR DEVELOPMENT WITH APPROPRIATE CONSIDERATION AS TO WHETHER THE PROPOSED CHANGE WILL FURTHER THE PURPOSES OF THIS CHAPTER IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
PROPERTY ALREADY HAS A FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION, A BAYFRONT MIXED USE VILLAGE.
THUS, THE REZONING OF THIS PARCEL IS NOT ONLY CONSISTENT WITH THE EXISTING LAND USE, BUT FURTHER COMPATIBILITY GOALS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
RECOMMENDATION Z 50 FOR TWENTY TWENTY ONE IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL.
BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THE BOARD MAY HAVE IN THE APPLICANT IS IN ATTENDANCE.
OR HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? NO, THANK YOU, PATRICK.
ALFIE, IF YOU WOULD COME TO THE PODIUM, PLEASE.
YES, SIR. GOOD NIGHT TO BOARD AND STAFF, I AM ALFRED THE FROM 16 TO 80 MAIN STREET AND ARTIST PALM BAY.
I DON'T HAVE TOO MUCH TO SAY, I GUESS, MR. PATRICK SAID IT ALL.
BUT YOU KNOW, MOST OF THE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD GOT THE OPPORTUNITY TO BE A MIXED USE VILLAGE.
AND I'M TRYING MY BEST TO GET AN APPROVAL AND I HAVE A PHOTOGRAPH HERE OF A BUILDING THAT I HAVE IN MIND. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU WANT TO TAKE A LOOK AT IT.
HMM. UH, SOMETIME IN THE FUTURE.
TRY TO TRY TO ASSIST WITH THE THAT DON'T TONE PALM BAY THAT WE'VE BEEN DREAMING ABOUT FOR THE PAST 30 YEARS.
SO I'D LIKE TO CONTRIBUTE TO IT.
YES, THERE'S ANY QUESTION AS BOARD HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. GARY. HEY, THANK YOU.
THANK YOU, SIR. OK, AT THIS TIME, I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.
IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISH TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS APPLICATION OR OPPOSED? NONE, SIR.
IF YOU HAVE SOMETHING TO SAY, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM.
MY NAME IS STEVE, DOWN AT 14 14 MAIN STREET NORTHEAST, CLOSE WITHIN 500 FEET, I THINK.
PROXIMITY TO WHERE THE STRUCTURES ARE PROPOSED.
AND MY ONLY CONCERN IS I BELIEVE THE REQUEST IS TO INCREASE THE DENSITY BY CHANGING THE ZONING LAWS. AND IF I UNDERSTANDING THAT CORRECTLY, THAT WOULD ALLOW TALLER BUILDINGS TO BE PUT INTO THE AREA.
AND I'M A LITTLE RESISTANT TO THAT PERSONALLY BECAUSE IT'S A RESIDENTIAL AREA AND ANYTHING THAT GOES IN THERE, I THINK, SHOULD BE VERY RESIDENTIAL.
AND ALSO WITH INCREASING VOTING IN THE AREA AND CREATING A MARINA, YOU KNOW, WE HAVE MANATEES IN THE TURKEY CREEK AREA.
AND THAT'S A BIG DEAL AND WE STILL HAVE SOME TURKEYS IN THE TURKEY CREEK AREA THAT COME THROUGH AND I GET A LITTLE CONCERNED ABOUT DEVELOPING THAT AREA.
ANYTHING BEYOND WHAT WOULD BE CONSIDERED BE, YOU KNOW, RESIDENTIAL.
AND SO ANYWAY, THAT'S MY ONLY OPPOSITION TO THIS.
I UNDERSTAND SPEAKING WITH SOME OF THE PEOPLE THAT ARE INVOLVED IN MAKING THE PROPOSAL THAT THEY IN FACT ONLY HAVE ONE ITEM THEY'RE CONCERNED ABOUT.
IF I UNDERSTAND THEM CORRECTLY AND THAT'S ABOUT BUILDING HEIGHT IN THE AREA AND THEY WANT, I THINK, UP TO 60 FEET, AND THAT WOULD BE ACCOMMODATED BY THE REQUEST AND CHANGING THE ZONING OF THAT AREA.
BUT I DON'T WANT TO WALK OUTSIDE MY HOUSE AND SEE A 60 FOOT BUILDING, YOU KNOW, STARING ME IN THE FACE. I WANT TO BE ABLE TO SEE THE RESIDENTIAL AREA AND ALL THE NICE TERRITORY
[00:10:03]
AROUND TURKEY CREEK.AND I'VE TALKED WITH MANY PEOPLE WHO'VE BEEN THROUGH THAT AREA, AND SO MANY PEOPLE WOULD LIKE TO MOVE INTO IT BECAUSE IT IS VERY RESIDENTIAL AND IT'S PEACEFUL.
AND I'D HATE TO SEE A HIGH DENSITY BUSINESS COME INTO THE AREA THAT WOULD BRING A LOT OF TRAFFIC INTO IT. SO I'M A LITTLE BIT RESISTANT ABOUT THAT BECAUSE I DON'T THINK IT FITS THE AREA. MY OPINION, DID YOU FILL OUT AN OATH CARD? NO, I DIDN'T. IF YOU WOULD JUST TAKE IT BACK TO YOUR SEAT AND LEAVE IT BEFORE YOU LEAVE, SEE? YEP. THANK YOU.
ANYONE ELSE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK? AND WE'LL CLOSE A PUBLIC HEARING AND BRING IT BACK TO THE BOARD.
PATRICK, DID YOU WANT TO RESPOND TO THAT, GENTLEMEN? WELL, I BELIEVE THE GENTLEMAN MAY MISUNDERSTAND WHICH PROPERTY WE'RE TALKING ABOUT RIGHT HERE. THIS PROPERTY IS NOT CLOSE OR ON MAIN STREET, IT'S NOT ON THE WATER.
THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT THIS ZONING CATEGORY ALLOW ONLY 35 FEET, NOT 60.
I THINK YOU MAY BE THINKING OF ONE OF THE OTHER CASES ON THE AGENDA TONIGHT.
THIS THIS PROPERTY RIGHT NOW IS ZONED HIGHLY COMMERCIAL, WHICH ALLOWS 40 FEET, SO THIS CHANGE WOULD ACTUALLY LESS THAN THE HEIGHT ON THE MAP.
UP THERE, YOU CAN SEE WHERE THIS IS LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF US, ONE ACROSS THE STREET FROM TURKEY CREEK. SO I THINK THERE MAY BE ANOTHER AGENDA ITEM THAT HE'S ACTUALLY SPEAKING ABOUT. THANK YOU, PATRICK.
ALL RIGHT. BOARD, CAN I GET A MOTION, PLEASE? MAKE A MOTION TO.
BRIEFCASE, THE FIFTY FOUR, TWENTY TWENTY ONE.
I GOT A MOTION FROM JAMES AND A SECOND FROM RICHARD, ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON FURTHER TO SAY I OPPOSED.
THAT'LL BE IT. CITY COUNCIL, FEBRUARY 3RD.
OK, OUR NEXT CASE UNDER NEW BUSINESS, PLEASE, PATRICK.
[NEW BUSINESS: ]
NEXT CASES SEE YOU ON TWENTY TWENTY TWO.SUBJECT PROPERTIES ARE LOCATED WEST OF AN ADJACENT AND MITTON ROAD NORTHWEST, SPECIFICALLY LODGE 23 AND 24, SECTION 24 BLOCK TWENTY FOUR POINT SEVENTY ONE OF PORTHMADOG UNIT 48 LOCATED IN TOWNSHIP 28 RANGE 36 BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, SPECIFICALLY AT 50 50 MITTEN ROAD NORTHWEST.
THE PROPERTY RECEIVED CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL BY WAY OF Q SIX, 1996.
THE REQUEST FROM 1996 WAS APPROVED WITH THE BINDING SITE PLAN FOR RETAIL, AUTOMOTIVE, GAS AND FUEL SALES. THIS REQUEST INCLUDES APPROXIMATELY ONE POINT ZERO FOUR ACRES OF LAND.
ANALYSIS THE PROPOSED REQUEST IS TO DEMOLISH THE EXISTING GAS STATION, RETAIL STORE AND ASSOCIATED PARKING AREAS AND CONSTRUCT A THREE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED SIXTY THREE SQUARE FOOT SINGLE STOREY AUTOMATIC TUNNEL CAR WASH 20 SELF OPERATED CLEANING AREAS.
NO REQUIREMENTS TO BE GRANTED CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL REQUESTS ARE EVALUATED UPON ITEMS A THROUGH EYE OF THE GENERAL REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF SECTION ONE EIGHTY FIVE POINT EIGHTY SEVEN OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES REVIEW OF THESE ITEMS AS FOLLOWS A ADEQUATE INGRESS AND EGRESS. ACCORDING INTO THE CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN, THE SITE WILL BE ACCESSED FROM THE EXISTING SOUTHERN DRIVEWAY LOCATED ALONG MITTON ROAD NORTHWEST.
THE EXISTING NORTHERN DRIVEWAY WILL BE CLOSED.
EXISTING DRIVER WILL BE RESTRICTED TO A RIDE IN RIDE OUT ONLY ACCESS.
IT IS LINE OF CODE DOES NOT CONTAIN A MINIMUM PARKING STANDARD FOR A CAR WASH FACILITY CONCERNED WITH SUCH A FACILITY AS THE STACKING AREA PROVIDED FOR VEHICLES WAITING TO ENTER THE CAR WASH FACILITY.
BUT THIS PARTICULAR OPERATION VEHICLES MOVE THROUGH THE WASHING FACILITY ON A COMPUTER CONTROLLED TRACK THAT BRINGS THE VEHICLE THROUGH THE WASH AND AUTOMATIC BLOWERS.
PATIENTS HAVE THE OPTION OF LEAVING THE SITE OR PULLING INTO A SELF-SERVE SPACE TO VACUUM THE INSIDE OF THE VEHICLE AND OR DRIVE OFF.
EXCESS WATER PLAN PROPOSES 20 SUCH SPACES, AS WELL AS AN ADDITIONAL SIX STANDARD PARKING SPACES. THERE ARE NO OTHER FACILITIES ON SITE.
I DIDN'T SEE PROPERLY LOCATED UTILITIES.
THIS AND GAS STATION IS CURRENTLY SERVICED BY A TWO INCH WATER MAIN THAT CONNECTS TO THE EXISTING EIGHT INCH WARNER MAIN LOCATED ALONG MINTON ROAD.
THE EXISTING SEPTIC SYSTEM WILL NEED TO BE ABANDONED AND THE PROPOSED CAR WASH WILL NEED TO HOOK UP TO THE CITY'S SEWER SYSTEM.
PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY SERVICED BY FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT.
ANY ADDITIONAL UPGRADES WILL REQUIRE TO BE DESIGNED PER MINUTE, INSTALLED AND INSPECTED.
DEVELOPERS COST THE SCREENING AND BUFFERING.
PARCEL OF LAND FOR WHICH THIS DEVELOPMENT IS PROPOSED IS CURRENTLY AN EXISTING GAS STATION SITE ABUTS MITTON ROAD TO THE EAST, A STRIP CENTER TO THE SOUTH.
A CITY CANAL NO. 66 TO THE WEST BUILDING IS APPROXIMATELY ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY FEET FROM EXISTING RESIDENTIAL HOMES LOCATED WEST OF THE PROPOSED CAR WASH.
STAFF RECOMMENDS AN EIGHT FOOT OPAQUE WALL OR FENCE PLACED ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY LINE TO ADEQUATELY SCREEN AND BUFFER THE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL ACADEMY SIGNS AND LIGHTING.
THE ATTACHED SIGN IS SHOWN ON THE DRAWING AND MEETS THE MINIMUM SET BACK REQUIREMENTS LIGHTING PLAN WAS NOT PROVIDED.
I'VE D NOTED THAT CITY CODES REQUIRE ANY LIGHTING TO BE SHIELDED AND OR DIRECTED DOWNWARD TO AVOID CREATING A NUISANCE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES.
OR IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE SIDE, PLAN REVIEW, ALIGHTING AND PHOTOMETRIC PLAN WILL BE
[00:15:01]
REQUIRED. F YARDS AND OPEN SPACES.JORDAN, AN OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS AND THE ZONING CODE HAVE BEEN MET ON THE CONCEPTUAL.
BY THE USE, THE PROJECT HAS BEEN DESIGNED WITH SUFFICIENT DRIVE AISLES AND AMPLE ON SITE MANEUVERABILITY OVER THE LOOP.
STACKING ON THE SITE AND INTERNAL DRIVING CONNECTIONS WILL PROVIDE FOR THE SAFE OFF STREET MOVEMENT. AN ABILITY BEAU'S USE IS PERMITTED BY WAY OF CONDITIONAL USE.
SITE WAS PREVIOUSLY A GAS STATION SITE IS BORDERED BY COMMERCIAL LAND TO THE NORTH SOUTH AND BY MINTON ROAD TO THE EAST.
I. WHAT OPERATION OF THE PROS USE WILL BE IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH ANY ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS AND SAFEGUARDS? CITY COUNCIL SCRIBE JORDAN COUNCIL HAVE THE AUTHORITY AND THE RIGHT TO IMPOSE ANY ADDITIONAL IN JUSTIFIABLE SAFEGUARDS AND OR CONDITIONS TO ENSURE THAT THE FACILITY OPERATES SAFELY AND HARMONIOUSLY WITH ITS SURROUNDINGS.
NATION, CASEY, YOU WON TWENTY TWENTY TWO IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL TO THE STAFF COMMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT.
HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS BOARD MAY HAVE.
OR HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? IN ONE PLACE. PATRICK, THEY HAD MENTIONED IN THERE THAT THERE WOULD BE NO BACKUPS ON TMIN10 ROAD. IS THAT ALMOST A GUARANTEE? THAT'S REALLY A BUSY INTERSECTION RIGHT THERE.
PEOPLE HEADING WEST OFF OF PALM BAY ROAD.
AND IF THERE WAS ANY BACKUP ONTO MINTON, THAT COULD BE DISASTROUS.
YEAH, DURING THE SITE PLAN, THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO SUBMIT AN ACCESS MANAGEMENT PLAN THAT SHOWS THE STABILITY OF THE SITE, HOW MANY CARS CAN ACTUALLY LOAD IN FRONT OF THE WASHING MACHINE, HOW FAR THAT CAN BE.
THAT LOOP CAN BE ACCOMMODATED ON SITE AND IF NEED BE, THERE'S A POSSIBILITY FOR ADDITIONAL LANES THAT COULD BE SIGNAGE OR SOMETHING.
NO, NO PARKING ON MINTON AT AREA.
I THINK IF YOU HAVE TO PARK ON MITTON, YOU'RE NOT GOING TO GO INTO THE CAR WASH AT THAT TIME. I'M NOT GOING TO SIT OUT IN THE MIDDLE OF THE AND WAITING TO GETTING ON TO A CAR WASH SITE. WE HAVE A FEW OTHERS IN TOWN.
WE DO. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? THANK YOU, PATRICK. WELL, THE APPLICANT, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM.
GOOD EVENING TO STAFF AND THE BOARD.
MY NAME IS CHRISTOPHER MORALES.
MY ADDRESS IS NINE 10 SOUTHEAST 17TH STREET IN FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA.
AND I'M HERE ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT AND AUTHORIZED AGENT, AS WELL AS CIVIL ENGINEER AND PROJECT MANAGER FOR THE PROJECT.
I THINK STAFF SUMMARIZED THE PROJECT RELATIVELY EXTENSIVELY, AND WE REALLY DON'T HAVE ANY OPPOSITION TO THE RECOMMENDED COMMENTS.
I JUST WANTED TO MENTION THE FACT THE STAFF MENTIONED THE INSTALLATION OF AN EIGHT FOOT WALL TO PROVIDE SOME BUFFERING FROM THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES TO THE WEST VERSUS AN EXISTING EIGHT FOOT WALL THERE THAT YOU CAN LEAVE IN PLACE, CERTAINLY.
AND I WANTED TO MENTION KIND OF ADDRESS TO COMMENT RELATED TO THE STACKING.
WE WILL DEFINITELY SUBMIT A STACKING ANALYSIS PLAN DURING THE PIPELINE PROCESS.
I DID WANT TO MENTION THAT THE PROPOSED USED, WHICH IS A CAR WHICH IS LESS INTENSIVE THAN THE EXISTING USE OF A GAS STATION.
SO WE EXPECT A LOT LESS TRAFFIC TO COME THROUGH AND WE'VE HAD CONVERSATIONS WITH THE COUNTY ABOUT SINCE WE'RE GOING TO BE CLOSING.
ONE OF THE ACCESSES IS GOING TO IMPROVE THE CONDITIONS THERE TO CREATE LESS STOPPING POINTS ALONG THE FRONTAGE OF THE PROPERTY, WHICH SHOULD MAKE OPERATION SAFER.
I ALSO KIND OF ANTICIPATING SOME OF THE QUESTIONS PREPARE SOME EXHIBITS THAT KIND OF SHOW SOME OF THE STACKING WE HAVE ABOUT CAPACITY AND I CAN PASS THIS TRAFFIC.
UM. THE THE PROPOSED IS OPERATIONALLY DOESN'T HAVE MORE THAN EIGHT CARS IN THE STACK AT ANY POINT DURING THE OPERATIONS, AND WE HAVE A CAPACITY ABOUT 15 CARS PRIOR TO THE FIRST PARKING SPACE. SO THAT WOULD PROPOSE A CONFLICT POINT.
SO I OF WANTED TO SHOW THAT I APPRECIATE THAT THE BOARD HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR MORALES. THIS IS THE OLD REPORT.
THIS IS THE SHELL GAS STATION.
ONE MORE, PLEASE. YOU HAD MENTION THAT SURROUNDING CAR WASHES ONLY HAVE THAT ABILITY OF EIGHT CARS, BUT THEY HAVE MULTIPLE LANES OF EIGHT CARS.
NO, I MENTIONED THAT FOR THIS SPECIFIC TENANT, THE KHALILAH CAR, WHICH OPERATIONALLY THEY THEY DON'T HAVE MORE THAN AN AVERAGE EIGHT CARS IN THE STACK AT ANY POINT DURING THE DAY.
THERE ARE OTHER LOCATIONS CORRECT? THAT NECESSARILY MEAN THAT PALM BAY WON'T BE THERE.
NOT NECESSARILY, BUT WE'LL BE PROVIDING DURING THE PIPELINE PROCESS LIKE A TRAFFIC ANALYSIS TO SHOW THAT QUEUING.
YEAH, THANK YOU. YOU'RE WELCOME.
YEAH, THE QUESTIONS. THINK OF MR. MORALES, THANK YOU. IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISH TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS
[00:20:02]
APPLICATION OR OPPOSED? YOU CAN SIT DOWN. THANK YOU.SEEING SEEING NONE AT THIS POINT, I'LL CLOSE A PUBLIC HEARING AND BRING IT BACK TO THE BOARD FOR A MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE Q1 2022 BASED ON THE STAFF'S COMMENTS.
I'M A MOTION FROM RICHARD, SECOND FROM LIDA.
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR, SAY I ALL OPPOSED.
OUR NEXT CASE, PLEASE, PATRICK, IT'S ON THE AGENDA IS TO TWENTY TWENTY TWO IS A TEXTUAL AMENDMENT TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES TITLE 17 LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, CHAPTER 185 ZONING CODE, SPECIFICALLY SECTION ONE THOUSAND FIVE POINT ZERO FOUR FOUR, WHICH IS THE H.S.
HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT.
THIS IS TO CREATE SUBSECTION ONE EIGHTY FIVE POINT ZERO FOUR FOR B TWENTY THREE POINT FOUR. THIS AMENDMENT IS CODY LAFFERTY OF LAFFERTY ALUMINUM SCREENING.
AFGHAN IS LOOKING TO MOVE THEIR EXISTING BUSINESS TO A LOCATION AT THE EAST END OF PALM BAY ROAD, WHICH IS ZONED.
H.S. ZONING DISTRICT DOES NOT CURRENTLY ALLOW THE PROPOSED USE THOSE LANGUAGES.
THIS AMENDMENT IS ATTACHED IN A LEGISLATIVE STYLE ZONING CODE IS BASED ON AND HAS BEEN ADOPTED TO EFFECTUATE AND IMPLEMENT THE POLICIES OF THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO PRESERVE AND IMPROVE THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE INHABITANTS OF THE CITY. VISIONS OF THE HOBBY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT ARE INTENDED TO APPLY TO AN AREA THEY'RE DEEMED TO BE UNIQUELY SUITED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF HIGHLY ORIENTED BUSINESSES IN REGIONAL SCALE FACILITIES.
AREAS ARE TO BE PRIMARILY LOCATED ALONG OR NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF MAJOR ARTERIALS, MAJOR TRANSPORTATION NODES.
WELL, THE APPLICANT HAS PROPOSED THE TEX AMENDMENT TO ALLOW FOR AN ALUMINUM SCREENING COMPANY AS A PERMITTED USE IN THE DISTRICT THAT HAS DRAFTED THIS AMENDMENT TO BE BEST SUITED FOR THIS PROPOSED USE CONSIDERATION FOR OTHER SIMILAR BUSINESSES.
AMENDMENT WOULD CREATE THE ABILITY TO LOCATE A CONTRACTOR'S OFFICE ON A PROPERTY WITH ZONING SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING ONE.
ALL WORK SHALL BE CONDUCTED WITHIN AN ENCLOSED STRUCTURE.
NO, TO ANY OUTSIDE STORAGE OF VEHICLES AND OR MATERIALS USED OR NEEDED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE BUSINESS SHALL BE STORED UPON AN IMPROVED SURFACE.
SHALL BE SCREENED ON ALL SIDES WITH A MINIMUM SIX FOOT TALL, OPAQUE MATERIAL AS APPROVED BY THE LAND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION.
THESE PROVISIONS ARE INCLUDED FOR THE HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES.
IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT ANY PERMITTED USE ON A PROPERTY ZONED H.S.
THAT INCLUDES 10 OR MORE ACRES WOULD REQUIRE CONDITIONALLY APPROVAL.
THAT RECOMMENDATION, BASED TO TWENTY TWENTY TWO, IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL, CAPPING ANSWERED QUESTIONS OF BOARD MAY HAVE.
WHAT HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? THANK YOU, PATRICK.
WELL, THE APPLICANT HAS COME TO THE PODIUM.
TONY MS. FOUR, TWO, SEVEN FIVE, ALYSSA LANE, WEST MELBOURNE, REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE APPLICANT AND AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
IT'S PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD, I THINK, AND I DON'T REALLY HAVE MUCH TO ADD SUPPORT BOARD HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR MASON.
IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISH TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS APPLICATION OR OPPOSED? NONE, I'LL CLOSE A PUBLIC HEARING AND BRING IT BACK TO THE BOARD FOR A MOTION, AND I GET A MOTION, PLEASE.
JUDITH? ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR, SAY I, I ALL OPPOSED THE MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY.
OR IN THIS CASE, PLEASE, PATRICK, ON AGENDAS T THREE TWENTY TWENTY TWO.
THIS IS A TEXTUAL AMENDMENT TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, SAME TITLE AND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
SAME ZONING CODE, SPECIFICALLY A SECTION ONE EIGHTY FIVE POINT ZERO FORTY TWO, WHICH IS NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT, CREATING ONE NINETY FIVE POINT FOUR TO BE 11.
THE APPLICANT FOR THIS AMENDMENT IS KIMBERLY MAYS.
THE APPLICANT IS LOOKING TO OPEN A BUSINESS THAT PROVIDES DOG TRAINING AND PET PHOTOGRAPHY, AND THIRTY FOUR POINT NINETY JUPITER BOULEVARD SOUTHEAST, WHICH IS OWNED C ZONING DISTRICT, DOES NOT CURRENTLY ALLOW THE PROPOSED USE.
SAME ANALYSIS BEFORE AS FAR AS HOW THE ZONING CODE IS SET UP.
WHAT IT IS SUPPOSED TO PROVIDE, SPECIFICALLY THE PROVISIONS OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, ARE INTENDED TO APPLY TO AREAS WHICH ARE DEEMED TO BE UNIQUELY SUITED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT MAINTENANCE OF LIMITED COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES, OFFERING CONVENIENCE GOODS AND PERSONAL SERVICES TO RESIDENTS OF THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD AREA. HE DISTRICTS ARE TO BE PRIMARILY LOCATED ALONG OR NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF MAJOR AND MINOR COLLECTIVE ROADWAYS AND ARE TYPICALLY LOCATED WITHIN RESIDENTIAL AREAS.
THE AFGHANISTAN THAT THEY TEACH DOG TRAINING CLASSES, INCLUDING VIRTUAL, PRIVATE AND GROUP OPTIONS, CONSULT WITH PET PARENTS ON A WIDE VARIETY OF DOGS.
NOT BOARD, THE DOGS BUSINESS WILL ALSO CONTAIN A STUDIO FOR DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHY, WITH ALL LAB WORK COMPLETED OFFSITE.
STAFF HAS DRAFTED THIS AMENDMENT TO ALLOW FOR THIS BUSINESS AND OTHER SIMILAR USES TO OPERATE AS A PERMITTED USE IN SEEING DISTRICT.
IT'S T THREE TWENTY TWENTY TWO IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL.
BOARD HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF.
[00:25:01]
APPLICANT, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM.GOOD EVENING, MY NAME IS KIM MAYS, I'M THE OWNER OF ROCK AND DOGS, LOCATED AT THIRTY FIVE FORTY JUPITER BOULEVARD AND PALM BAY.
AND YOU JUST BRIEFLY SUMMARIZE WHAT WHAT YOU INTEND TO DO HERE.
OK, SO WE HAVE A DOG TRAINING FACILITY WHERE PEOPLE COME IN FOR BASICALLY TRAINING THEIR OWN PETS. SO WE OFFER OBEDIENCE, BASIC BEHAVIORAL KIND OF ACCOMMODATION.
SO WE WORK VERY HAND IN HAND WITH VETERINARY OFFICES PROVIDING KIND OF HOUSEHOLD MANNERS OR PETS. WOULD HAVE ANY QUESTION FOR MS. MAYS. BASICALLY, HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN IN BUSINESS AND.
I'VE BEEN TRAINING IN BREVARD COUNTY FOR OVER 25 YEARS, ROCK AND DOGS WAS ESTABLISHED SEVEN YEARS AGO.
WE WERE LOCATED IN ROCK COLLEGE AND WE'VE JUST RECENTLY MOVED TO PALM BAY.
THE QUESTION. WELCOME TO PALM BAY, THANK YOU, MS..
THANK YOU VERY MUCH. IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISH TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OR OPPOSED TO THIS APPLICATION? AND I WILL CLOSE A PUBLIC HEARING AND BRING IT BACK TO THE BOARD FOR A MOTION.
TWENTY. A MOTION FROM LEADER'S SECOND FROM REYNOR, ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? WELL, IF YOU EVER SAY I, I ALL OPPOSED MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY.
OUR NEXT CASE, PLEASE, PATRICK.
THIS CASE ON THE AGENDA IS CP TWO TWENTY TWENTY TWO.
SUBJECT PROPERTIES ARE LOCATED SOUTH OF AN ADJACENT TO MALOMO ROAD, NORTHWEST.
EAST OF AN ADJACENT TO MELBOURNE TILLMANN WATER CANAL DISTRICT SEVEN.
THERE ARE SIX PARCELS INCLUDED IN THIS REQUEST.
THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY HAS REQUESTED A VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF PALM BAY FROM UNINCORPORATED BREVARD COUNTY.
WHEN LAND IS ANNEXED INTO THE CITY IS PRUDENT THAT SETTLEMENT IS ASSIGNED TO FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY AND ZONING DESIGNATION THAT IS MOST APPROPRIATE AS THE PURPOSE OF THIS REQUEST. OR THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REGULATION SECTION ONE, EIGHTY THREE POINT ZERO AND B, THE PURPOSE IN 10 OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS TO ENCOURAGE THE MOST APPROPRIATE USE OF LAND AND RESOURCES TO PROMOTE THE HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE COMMUNITY.
AND ONE FEATURE LENGTH OF SETTLEMENT, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR EACH ELEMENT GOAL, IF ALL YOU WANT IS TO ENSURE A HIGH QUALITY DIVERSIFIED LIVING ENVIRONMENT THROUGH THE EFFICIENT DISTRIBUTION OF COMPATIBLE LAND USES.
WELL, I YOU TWO IS TO PROVIDE FOR AND MAINTAIN VIABLE NEIGHBORHOODS AND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT TO MEET THE EXISTING AND FUTURE NEEDS OF THE RESIDENTS OF PALM BAY.
THEN YOU GO EVALUATE IS TO PROVIDE FOR A DIVERSE AND SELF-SUSTAINING PATTERN OF LAND USAGE THAT SUPPORT THE PRESENT AND FUTURE POPULATION IN THE CITY OF PALM BAY.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A FUTURE LAND CLASSIFICATION OF MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE IN THE WEST END OF MARLBOROUGH.
THERE ARE OVER 2000 SINGLE FAMILY UNITS APPROVED AND OR UNDER CONSTRUCTION.
COURSE THE CATEGORY WILL OFFER A MORE DIVERSE HOUSING OPPORTUNITY.
TWO CONSERVATION ELEMENT, ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTER OF THE CITY IS MAINTAINED THROUGH CONSERVATION, APPROPRIATE USE AND PROTECTION OF NATURAL RESOURCES.
SUBJECT PROPERTY IS NOT LOCATED WITH ANY OF THE FOUR DESCRIPTION:A POLYGON'S IDENTIFIED IN THE CITY'S HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN.
NO OTHER PROTECTED SPECIES ARE KNOWN TO INHABIT THIS PROPERTY.
ANY PROTECTED SPECIES THAT WOULD BE FOUND ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WOULD NEED TO BE MITIGATED AS REQUIRED BY STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS AND FOR A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICY. SEAL IN-DASH ONE POINT SEVEN.
WELL, MANAGEMENT PROPERTY IS NOT WITHIN THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA.
FREE HOUSING ELEMENT ROSE FLUE AMENDMENT DOES NOT ADVERSELY IMPACT THE SUPPLY AND VARIETY OF SAFE, DECENT, ATTRACTIVE AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING WITHIN THE CITY.
INSTEAD, IT WILL SERVE TO CREATE ADDITIONAL MULTIFAMILY HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES NEEDED IN PALM BAY. OR INFRASTRUCTURE? CITY EVALUATES PRESENT IN FUTURE WATER, SEWER DRAINAGE, SOLID WASTE AND ASSESSES THE ABILITY OF INFRASTRUCTURE TO SUPPORT DEVELOPMENT FACILITIES WHO CHANGE WILL NOT CAUSE A LITTLE SERVICE TO FALL BELOW THE STANDARDS ADOPTED IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THESE SERVICES FOR THE CURRENT PLANNING PERIOD.
PUBLIC WATER AND SEWAGE FACILITIES ARE AVAILABLE ALONG MALWARE ROAD.
POTABLE WATER, IF DEVELOPED, THE OWNER DEVELOPER WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR EXTENDING SERVICE TO THE SITE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT CITY REGULATIONS SANITARY SEWER.
SAME THING, IF THE OWNER DEVELOPED RESPONSIBLE FOR EXTENDING SERVICE TO THE SITE, MEETING ALL THE. BALTER WASTE IS PROVIDED BY PUBLIC SERVICE.
DRAINAGE, IF DEVELOP A DRAINAGE PLAN, MUST BE PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT REGULATIONS AND APPROVED BY THE CITY, ALONG WITH APPROPRIATE OUTSIDE AGENCIES, INCLUDING THE ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT.
ANY PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM WILL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
THOSE FLU AMENDMENT TO MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL WILL ADD HOUSING UNITS.
SOME IMPACTS TO THE PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM ARE ANTICIPATED.
HOWEVER, CONSIDERING THE ADJACENT CONCURRENCY SERVICE AREAS, THERE ARE SUFFICIENT CAPACITY. OR THE RESOURCES, THERE IS NO FLORIDA MASTER SITE FILE FOR ANY HISTORIC RESOURCES ON THE PROPERTY.
[00:30:01]
ITEM SIX, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT, MOST FLU AMENDMENT WOULD INCREASE THE DEMAND FOR RECREATION SERVICES AS COMPARED TO THE EXISTING RIZWAN LAND USE OF OUR COUNTY DOESN'T. THIS WOULD NOT EXCEED THE EXISTING PARKLAND OR RECREATION LEVEL SERVICE STANDARDS. TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT.THE OBJECTIVES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLANS TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ARE TO PROVIDE A SAFE, BALANCED, EFFICIENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM THAT MAINTAINS A ROADWAY LEVEL SERVICE AND ADEQUATELY SERVES THE NEEDS OF THE COMMUNITY.
IF DEVELOPED, A TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS WILL BE REQUIRED TO DETERMINE ANY NEGATIVE IMPACTS ON EXISTING TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM, ALONG WITH ANY SUGGESTED IMPROVEMENTS WHICH WILL BE TAKEN UNDER CONSIDERATION DURING THE SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS.
SUBJECT PROJECT A PROJECT IS DEVELOPED WILL BE REQUIRED TO PAY AS PROPORTIONATE, FAIR SHARE COSTS TO OFFSET THE IMPACTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT ON THE SURROUNDING ROAD NETWORK.
THAT'S THE PROPERTY RIGHTS SETTLEMENT, ALL THE COMPREHENSIVE PLANS, PROPERTY RIGHTS ELEMENTS FOR THE CITY TO RESPECT, OFFICIALLY ACKNOWLEDGE AND CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS.
THOSE LAND USE CHANGE DOES NOT APPEAR TO INFRINGE UPON THE PROPERTY RIGHTS OF THE.
URBAN PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD AND CITY COUNCIL MUST DETERMINE IF THE REQUEST BASED UPON THE SUBMITTED MATERIAL AND PRESENTATION MADE BY THE APPLICANT MEETS THE GENERAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE CODE OF SAYS, AS IDENTIFIED IN THE.
HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS WE MAY HAVE APPLICANT IS IN ATTENDANCE.
THE BOARD HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF.
THERE ARE ANY OTHER DESIGNATION THAT CAN THAT CAN APPLY TO LAND, AS THAT IS A NEXT TO THE NEXT INTO THE CITY.
THERE ANYTHING ELSE, IS THERE ANY OTHER ZONING DESIGNATION FOR? THERE, THOUGH, THERE'S A HOST OF OTHER LAND USE AND ZONING DESIGNATIONS THAT COULD APPLY.
THE APPLICANT IS INTENDING TO DEVELOP THIS PROPERTY IN THE FUTURE FOR MULTIPLE FAMILY.
THAT'S THE SINGLE GOAL OF THEIR DEVELOPMENT PLAN.
SO THE LAND USE THAT'S BEFORE YOU MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE WOULD BE THE APPLICABLE ZONING OR LAND USE CATEGORY FOR WHAT THEY WANT TO DO.
YOU'RE THE QUESTIONS. THANK YOU, PATRICK WYLLIE, APPLICANTS REPRESENTATIVE, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM.
GOOD EVENING, MR. CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE BOARD, MY NAME IS JACK KIRSHENBAUM.
I'M A LAWYER WITH GRAY ROBINSON, AND IT'S A PLEASURE TO BE IN FRONT OF YOU HERE THIS EVENING WITH THIS PRESENTATION I HAVE WITH ME, AS WELL AS ON KAMAAL, WHO'S AN ENGINEER WITH BSE ENGINEERING, AND HE'S GOT ALL THE TECHNICAL STUFF THAT YOU MIGHT HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT, AND WE ALSO HAVE A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE DEVELOPER STELLAR COMMUNITIES.
AND THAT'S ALEXANDER DE SCHABIR.
AND IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THE COMPANY AND THE PROPOSAL AND I ALREADY HEARD ONE THERE, WE'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER THEM TO YOU.
I BROUGHT SOME DEMONSTRATIVE AID, SOME PICTURES WHICH I HOPE WILL MAKE IT QUICKER BECAUSE I KNOW YOU GOT A LONG AGENDA AND CLEAR AS WELL, AND AS IF I MIGHT APPROACH YOU AND HAND THEM OUT. THE FIRST THING. THE FIRST THING I'D LIKE TO SAY IS THAT THIS IS A REALLY EXCITING OPPORTUNITY.
THIS IS A UNIQUE PROPOSAL, A UNIQUE DEVELOPMENT, AND ONCE YOU HEAR WHAT WE HAVE TO SAY, I HOPE YOU'LL AGREE. I HOPE YOU'LL ALSO SAY WELCOME TO PALM BAY LIKE YOU DID TO THE THE LADY THAT WAS JUST HERE BECAUSE THIS PROPERTY IS IN BREVARD COUNTY AND EVERY MARCH OF A THOUSAND MILES BEGINS WITH ONE STEP IN.
THE FIRST STEP HERE WILL BE AN APPROVAL BY THE CITY COMMISSION TO ACCEPT OUR REQUEST TO ANNEX INTO THE CITY.
AND AS IT COMES INTO THE CITY, IT NEEDS AND DESERVES BOTH A DESIGNATION AS WELL AS ZONING. AND SO WHAT WE PRESENT TO YOU THIS EVENING IS AN OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE WHAT IS REALLY A UNIQUE DEVELOPMENT AND THE STELLAR COMMUNITIES IS DESCRIBED THERE FOR YOU ON THE PAGES ONE AND TWO ON PAGE THREE.
YOU KNOW, THE LOCATION OF THIS PROPERTY, WHICH IS AT THE SOUTH END OF THE CURRENT COMPLETED PARKWAY AND ON ITS WEST BOUNDARY, WILL BE THE EXTENSION OF THE PARKWAY JUST ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MALABAR ROAD.
IF YOU LOOK OVER IT, PAGE FOUR, YOU'LL SEE THE DETAILS OF THE DEVELOPMENT ITSELF.
WHAT IS PROPOSED IS ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTEEN ONE BEDROOM, ONE BATH UNITS, ONE HUNDRED AND TWO BEDROOM, TWO BATH UNITS AND FORTY EIGHT THREE BEDROOM, TWO BATH UNITS.
ON THIS, ABOUT TWENTY SEVEN ACRES ON PAGES FIVE AND SIX ARE SIMILAR COMMUNITIES, BUT I'D
[00:35:05]
LIKE YOU TO LOOK AT IF YOU COULD.PAGE. NUMBER EIGHT, BECAUSE WHAT YOU'RE GETTING IN THIS PROPOSAL, IF IT'S APPROVED, BOTH THE COMP PLAN AND THE ZONING AND I'LL ADDRESS THEM TOGETHER, BUT I'LL YOU'LL HAVE TO VOTE SEPARATELY. OF COURSE, ON THE NEXT ITEM AS WELL IS YOU'RE GETTING A GATED COMMUNITY, UPSCALE GREEN, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, RENTAL COMMUNITIES WITH BACKYARDS AND ALL THOSE THINGS THAT YOU WOULD FIND IN A SINGLE FAMILY GATED, UPSCALE COMMUNITY ONLY.
THEY'RE THEIR PROPERTIES BUILT, MANAGED BY STELLAR, AND THEY GIVE A OPPORTUNITY OF A VARIETY OF HOUSING THAT REALLY ISN'T FOUND IN PALM BAY AND REALLY NOT FOUND IN BREVARD COUNTY YET.
THESE DEVELOPMENTS ARE IN OTHER COMMUNITIES THAT ARE HUGELY SUCCESSFUL.
I DON'T KNOW IF ANY OF YOU HAVE TRIED TO PUT TOGETHER A DOWN PAYMENT FOR A HOME RECENTLY, BUT THESE GIVE TREMENDOUS OPPORTUNITIES FOR FOLKS THAT AREN'T READY TO BUY A HOME OR CHOOSE NOT TO BUY A HOME.
IT'S A UNIQUE OPPORTUNITY, A UNIQUE PRODUCT.
IT'S A GREEN AND AND AND PROVIDE SOMETHING THAT IS REALLY KIND OF SPECIAL, AND THAT'S WHAT I HAVE TO SAY ABOUT THE PROJECT ITSELF.
AND IF YOU HAVE TECHNICAL QUESTIONS, AZAAN IS HERE TO ANSWER THOSE QUESTIONS AND ANYTHING ABOUT THE COMPANY.
IT'S A BOARD HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT.
AND YOUR SUMMARY REQUEST, IT SAYS MULTIPLE FAMILY, BUT IT'S GOING TO BE SINGLE FAMILY.
THE THE ACTUAL BUILDINGS ARE SINGLE FAMILY, BUT IT IS A MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT FITS IN YOUR CODE.
I CAN ANSWER THAT QUESTION A LITTLE FURTHER, TOO, BECAUSE NOT ALL OF THESE STRUCTURES ARE BEING SUBDIVIDED AND SOLD WITH LAND TO A SINGLE FAMILY TO OWN THIS PROPERTY, AND THIS HOUSE IS MULTIPLE FAMILIES LIVING ON ONE PARCEL OF LAND.
SO BY DEFINITION, THAT'S MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE.
SO IT'S A REALLY UNIQUE OPPORTUNITY.
AND I CAN TELL YOU, WE'VE MET WITH WITH COUNTLESS TIMES WITH YOUR STAFF AND THE LEGAL STAFF AND AND THEY'VE BEEN THEY'VE MADE SURE WE'VE DONE EVERYTHING THAT NEEDED TO BE DONE TO GET TO THIS POINT.
AND, YOU KNOW, THE OTHER QUESTIONS FOR ME OR HASSAN OR ALEX, I DO WANT.
YES, SIR. YOU SAID THAT IT GIVES AN OPPORTUNITY FOR PEOPLE TO SAVE MONEY FOR DOWN PAYMENTS. OBVIOUSLY, YOU'RE NOT GOING TO GIVE ME RENTAL RATES, BUT IS IT GOING TO BE MORE ON THE LOWER END? I MEAN, THIS LOOKS LIKE A REALLY NICE PRODUCT.
IS IT GOING TO BE REALLY NICE UNITS? AND I'LL LET ALEX SUGGEST THAT HE CAN TALK ABOUT THE.
ALEX DE SHABBIR, ONE, SEVEN, FIVE CITIZENS DRIVE, MELBOURNE BEACH, AS JACK SAID, I WORK FOR THE DEVELOPER, THE PRESIDENT FOR THE CENTRAL FLORIDA DIVISION.
THE PRODUCT, YOU KNOW, WE'VE DONE SOME MARKET ANALYSIS INITIALLY AND YOU KNOW, WE GENERALLY RUN IN THE RANGE OF A DOLLAR 90 TO LOW $2 SQUARE FOOT RANGE.
THAT'S WHAT WE PROJECT THIS PRODUCT TO COME IN AT.
AND AS JACK MENTIONED, IT LIVES LIKE A SINGLE FAMILY HOME.
IT DOES NOT LIVE LIKE A APARTMENT OR A TYPICAL MULTIFAMILY.
THE TWO THREE BEDROOMS ARE TOTALLY SEPARATE IN THE INSTANCE THEY SIT ON A PIECE OF LAND THAT ARE NOT CONNECTED. ONE BEDROOM IS A DUPLEX, SO THAT'S MORE OF A SHARED WALL SITUATION, AND IT'S NOT GOING TO BE AN AFFORDABLE HOUSING TYPE COMMUNITY.
ABSOLUTELY NOT. I KNOW THIS CATERS TO A MORE UPSCALE RENTER IN OUR MARKET.
ANALYSIS HAS SAID THIS IS A SNOWBIRD RETIREE DOESN'T WANT LIVE IN A CONDO ONCE I HAVE A BACKYARD, WANTS TO BUILD UP THEIR DOG OUT, DOESN'T LIKE CONDO LIVING.
AND THEN WE ALSO HAVE, YOU KNOW, FAMILIES, YOUNG FAMILIES THAT AREN'T JUST READY TO PURCHASE JUST NOW.
YOU'RE WELCOME. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, I JUST HAVE A QUICK QUESTION.
IS THIS GOING TO BE A PHASE PROJECT OR IS THIS ALL ALL IN AT ONCE, ALL IN ONE PHASE? THE OTHER QUESTIONS. THANKS, SIR.
VERY WELCOME. IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS APPLICATION OR OPPOSED? NONE, I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HERE.
SEE, OVER IN THE CORNER. BILL BURTON, FIVE SIX, OCEAN SPRAY STREET, SOUTHWEST, WHEN I WAS GOING THROUGH THE PACKET, I DIDN'T SEE THE PACKAGE THEY JUST PRESENTED TO YOU.
AND IT PUTS AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT LIGHT ONTO THE PROJECT, AND WE'VE BEEN TALKING ALL ALONG ABOUT NOT HAVING THIS TYPE OF HOUSING AVAILABLE FOR RENTAL.
I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE RENTAL RATE IS GOING TO BE.
[00:40:02]
I WISH I COULD HAVE HEARD THAT SOMEPLACE IN THE PRESENTATION, BUT I'M LOOKING FORWARD TO SEEING SOMETHING LIKE THIS ALONG THIS LOCATION BECAUSE IT'S WHAT THE CITY'S KIND OF NEEDED. JUST BECAUSE WE HAVE WE'RE TRYING TO SOLVE THAT RENTAL PROBLEM, AND I LOOK AT THIS AS SOMETHING THAT'S GOING TO WORK TOWARDS THAT OBJECTIVE.THANK YOU VERY MUCH AND THANK YOU FOR LETTING ME HAVE YOUR PACKET.
THANK YOU, BILL. ANYONE ELSE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISH TO SPEAK? THOSE PUBLIC HEARING AND BRING IT BACK TO THE BOARD FOR A MOTION.
ERKAN A MOTION FROM LEADERS SECOND FROM JAMES, ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR, SAY I, I'LL OPPOSED MOTION.
IT. HERS WITH ONE OPPOSED THAT WAS REYNOR.
OUR NEXT CASE, PLEASE, THE COMPANION ZONING CASE, PLEASE, PATRICK.
THIS IS THE COMPANION REZONING SAME BACKGROUND, THE SAME PROPERTY LOCATION, SAME APPLICANT. THE APPLICANT STATES THE JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CHANGE IS TO CHANGE THE ZONING DISTRICT TO ENABLE THE DEVELOPER TO CONSTRUCT A PROPOSED MULTIFAMILY COMMUNITY WITH UP TO 266 UNITS AND AMENITIES.
THEY'RE ASKING FOR THE RMN SINGLE TO AND MULTIPLE FAMILY ZONING DISTRICT CATEGORY, WHICH WILL ALLOW FOR A MIX OF SINGLE DETACHED RENTALS, DUPLEXES AND TRIPLEXES.
CHANGING ZONING WILL ALLOW FOR A MIX OF MUCH NEEDED MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL OPTIONS WITHIN THE CITY. DESIGNATION OF THE ARMS AND ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE SUBJECT, PROPERTY IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA AND IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S DESIRE AND PLAN FOR DIVERSIFIED HOUSING OPTIONS.
APPROXIMATELY ZERO ACRES OF UNDEVELOPED LAND IS LOCATED WITHIN FIVE MILES OF THE SUBJECT PARCEL. THOSE AMENDMENT WILL FURTHER THE PURPOSES OF THE CHAPTER 195 IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THAT CONCLUSION, BOARD AND COUNCIL MUST DETERMINE IF THIS MEETS THE GENERAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCE, AS IDENTIFIED IN THIS REPORT.
HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE OR HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF.
THANK YOU, PATRICK, MR KERSHAW, MA'AM.
YES, SIR, IT'S ME AGAIN, JACK KIRSCHENBAUM, GREG ROBINSON.
EVERYTHING THAT I SAID IN THE LAST SESSION, I'D LIKE TO REASSERT HERE AGAIN WITHOUT HAVING TO GO BACK THROUGH IT AGAIN.
THE ONE THING THAT I WOULD SAY IS THIS ZONING WILL BE COMPATIBLE AND CONSISTENT WITH THAT, WHICH IS APPROPRIATE FOR THIS AREA AT THIS TIME, AND ANY OF THE TRAFFIC ISSUES WILL BE HANDLED BY THE TRAFFIC STUDY THAT WILL COME DOWN AND YOU'LL SEE IT AT SITE PLANNING TIME IS A BOARD OF ANY QUESTIONS.
THANK YOU, MR. KIRSHENBAUM. IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK EITHER IN FAVOR OR OPPOSE THIS APPLICATION BILL? ANYTHING ELSE? I WILL CLOSE A PUBLIC HEARING AND BRING IT BACK TO THE BOARD FOR A MOTION.
I CAN. FROM LETO'S SECOND FROM RICHARD, ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? I JUST WANT TO SAY THAT MY ONLY CONCERN WITH THIS IS, OF COURSE, IS TRAFFIC.
WE ALL KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON IN MALABAR ROAD AND THE TRAFFIC.
AND OF COURSE, THIS IS ALL YOU KNOW, A TRAFFIC STUDY WILL BE REQUIRED, SO THAT WILL ADDRESS THAT ISSUE. SO OTHER THAN THAT, IT'S A NICE PROJECT.
IT'S BASICALLY THEY'RE DETACHED VILLAS AS OPPOSED TO GOING UP IN THE FORM OF TOWNHOUSES.
SO IT'S IT'S AN INTERESTING OPTION FOR PEOPLE.
SO ALL IN FAVOR SAY I ALL OPPOSED.
MOTION CARRIES AGAIN ONE REYNOR OPPOSED.
OUR NEXT CASE, PLEASE, PATRICK.
IT'S A CASE ON THE AGENDA IS CP3.
TWENTY TWENTY TWO PROPERTIES LOCATED WEST SEVEN ADJACENT TO THOR AVENUE IN THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF PORT MELBOURNE UNIT 40, SPECIFICALLY THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES LOTS EIGHT AND NINE BLOCK NINETEEN NINETY ONE PORT MELBOURNE UNIT 40 LOCATED IN SECTION THREE TOWNSHIP TWENTY NINE SOUTH RANGE THIRTY SEVEN EAST BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA LOTS TOTAL APPROXIMATELY ONE POINT ZERO TWO ACRES OF UNDEVELOPED LAND.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A SMALL SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT TO CHANGE THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY FOR MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE TO COMMERCIAL USE. THE APPLICANT IS M.
SETTLEMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR L.A.
SETTLEMENT POLICY, I FEEL YOU THREE TO PROVIDE FOR ECONOMICALLY VIABLE COMMERCIAL AREAS WHICH PROMOTE A SOUND AND DIVERSIFIED LOCAL ECONOMY, SERVE THE RETAIL AND SERVICE NEEDS OF THE CITY'S RESIDENTS.
THE LATEST ELEMENT OBJECTIVE FLEW THREE POINT ONE IS TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL COMMERCIAL AREAS BY TIGHT SIZE AND DISTRIBUTION BASED UPON AREA NEED AND AVAILABILITY OF SUPPORTING INFRASTRUCTURE. YOU THEN USE THREE POINT ONE, EH, TO ENSURE THAT THE ACREAGE OF COMMERCIAL LAND PERMITTED BY THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP SHALL NOT EXCEED PROJECTED NEEDS.
OR MAYBE UNIFORM IS A MIX OF COMMERCIAL AND MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES LOCATED IN THE VICINITY SOUTHEAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF MALABAR ROAD AND BABCOCK STREET, TYPEKIT HAS INFORMED STAFF THAT HE HAS BEEN APPROACHED BY SEVERAL COMMERCIAL BUSINESSES WANTING
[00:45:02]
TO CONSTRUCT FACILITIES WITHIN PALM BAY.THEY HAVE EXPRESSED INTEREST IN THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES DUE TO THEIR PROXIMITY TO MAJOR ROADWAYS. COMMERCIAL USE FLEW CATEGORY PERMITS, A MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA RATIO OF TWO POINT FIVE. TYPICAL USE IS PERMITTED INCLUDE OFFICES, RETAIL BUSINESSES, PERSONAL SERVICE BUSINESSES, DAYCARE CENTERS, RESTAURANTS, FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, HOTELS AND MOTELS.
INSTITUTIONAL USES AND SIMILAR USES.
VIRTUAL LAND USE EXIST TO THE SOUTH, WEST AND ACROSS THE AVENUE TO THE EAST, UNDEVELOPED MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AREAS EXIST TO THE NORTH WEST AND PIERCE COMPATIBLE WITH THE AREA. THIS MOMENT.
PARCELS NOT LOCATE WITH ANY OF THE FLORIDA SCRIPTURE POLYGON'S IDENTIFIED IN THE CITY'S HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN AND NO ADDITIONAL LISTED SPECIES ARE KNOWN TO INHABIT THE PROPERTY, IF ANY SPECIES WERE TO BE IDENTIFIED, THEY WOULD NEED TO BE MITIGATED FOR STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS AND CITIES COMPREHENSIVE.
PROPERTY IS ALSO NOT LOCATED IN THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA.
HOUSING, ELLEN, THE PROPOSED COMMERCIAL USE FLU LIMIT DOES NOT ADVERSELY IMPACT THE SUPPLY AND VARIETY OF SAFETY, ATTRACTIVE AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN THE CITY AS IT DOESN'T ALLOW FOR HOUSING INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT FACILITIES.
THE AMENDMENT WILL NOT CAUSE A LITTLE SERVICE.
STANDARDS FALL BELOW THOSE ADOPTED IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE CURRENT PLANNING PERIOD. PROPERTY CURRENTLY HAS CITY WATER AND CITY SEWER AVAILABLE TO IT.
ANY DEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE SHALL MEET ALL CRITERIA OF THE CITY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE IN ANY. ALL CRITERIA OF RULE 62 330, THE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE ALIGNS WITH. THESE PROVISIONS WILL BE REVIEWED AND ENFORCED DURING THE ADMINISTRATIVE PLANNING REVIEW PROCESS. SOLID WASTE IS PROVIDED TO THE AREA BY REPUBLICAN SERVICES, THERE IS SUFFICIENT CAPACITY WITHIN OUR COUNTY LANDFILLS TO SERVICE THE.
PUBLIC SCHOOLS AMENDMENT TO COMMERCIAL USE WILL NOT ADD HOUSING UNITS.
THUS, THE AMENDMENT WILL NOT HAVE NO IMPACT ON THE PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM.
OPEN SPACE. SINCE THERE IS NO HOUSING, IT ALSO WILL NOT AFFECT THIS ELEMENT WHATSOEVER.
TRANSPORTATION. AND ROADWAY SEGMENTS MUST MEET A LEVEL SERVICE SEE FOR THE CITY'S ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. LATEST FDOT 20 20 QUALITY AND LEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK GENERALIZED ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY VOLUME FOR URBANIZED AREAS WILL BE USED FOR THE ANALYSIS WHEN SITE PLANS ARE SUBMITTED. HOWEVER, NO IMPACTS TO ADJACENT ROADWAYS ARE ANTICIPATED AT THIS TIME. PROPERTY RIGHTS ELEMENT IS PROPOSED.
LAND USE DOES NOT APPEAR TO INFRINGE UPON THE PROPERTY RIGHTS OF THE APPLICANT.
RECOMMENDATION KCPE THREE TWENTY TWENTY TWO IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL, SUBJECT TO STAFF COMMENTS TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS BOARD MAY HAVE.
WHAT HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? THANK YOU, PATRICK LILLY, APPLICANTS REPRESENTATIVE.
THE MOUALEM IS NOT HERE, I DON'T NOT SEE HIM.
REPRESENTATIVE. SO BOARD HAS THE RIGHT IF THEY WANT TO HEAR THE CASE BASED ON ITS MERIT AND ON THE STAFF REPORT, OR IF THEY WANT TO CONTINUE THIS TO THE NEXT MONTH SO THAT THE APPLICANT CAN ATTEND AND MAKE HIS PRESENTATION, IT'S COMPLETELY THE DISCRETION OF THE BOARD. A BOARD, WHAT IS YOUR PLEASURE? I SUGGEST, I SUGGEST WE.
YEAH, WE HEAR THIS THAT OVER OUR NEXT MEETING NEXT MONTH, I JUST MAKE A COMMENT, THOUGH.
YOU KNOW, I BELIEVE YOU'RE ALSO A VOLUNTEER POLICEMAN FOR THE CITY OF PALM BAY, AND I PATROL THAT AREA ALL THE TIME.
AND THIS WOULD BE A WELCOME ADDITION TO THAT AREA.
IT IS KIND OF RUNDOWN BACK THERE AND THIS COULD BE A LAUNCHING POINT FOR MORE COMMERCIAL BACK THERE. THAT'S IT, THANK YOU.
THANK YOU, DON. MY ONLY INTERJECTION WOULD BE, I AGREE WITH YOU, DON.
AT THE SAME TIME, I ALSO AGREE WITH YOU, PHIL.
I THINK WE SHOULD TABLE IT AND HEAR IT NEXT MONTH.
LOOK, CAN I GET A MOTION TO CONTINUE THIS CASE AND TO OUR NEXT OUR NEXT MEETING A MOTION TO POSTPONE KCP THREE 22 UNTIL NEXT MONTH'S MEETING? WHAT WOULD BE THE DATE OF THAT, PATRICK? YOU HAVE THAT IN FRONT OF YOU. IT'S FEBRUARY 3RD.
WOULD YOU AMEND YOUR MOTION TO INCLUDE THE DATE, PLEASE? YES. MOTION TO POSTPONE KCP THREE, 2022 UNTIL NEXT MONTH'S CASE OF FEBRUARY 2ND.
SECOND MOTION FROM RICHARD, A SECOND FROM RAINER, ANY DISCUSSION.
ALL IN FAVOR SAY I ALL OPPOSED.
MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY AND THE COMPANION CASE KPI'S, IF WE CAN GET THE SIMILAR MOTION, PLEASE. MOTION TO POSTPONE CP'S THREE ASH 2022 UNTIL THE FEBRUARY 2ND MEETING AGAIN IN THE SECOND ANY DISCUSSION.
ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE, ALL OPPOSED.
THAT CASE WILL BE CONTINUED, THEN UNTIL FEBRUARY 2ND.
[00:50:03]
OUR NEXT CASE, PLEASE, PATRICK.IT'S ON THE AGENDA AS CASE FOR TWENTY TWENTY TWO PROPERTIES LOCATED WEST OF AN ADJACENT TO GAINOR DRIVE SOUTHWEST AND IN THE VICINITY NORTH OF OCEAN SPRAY STREET, SOUTHWEST, SPECIFICALLY TAX PARCEL 251 FROM 13 TOWNSHIP TWENTY NINE RANGE THIRTY SIX OF BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA. THIS FINAL REQUEST INCLUDES APPROXIMATELY TWENTY NINE POINT ONE FIVE ACRES OF LAND. WHAT MARLBORO UNIT THIRTY TWO HAS BEEN PLANTED SINCE NINETEEN SIXTY TWO? PARCEL TO FIFTY ONE WAS EXCLUDED FROM THIS PLAN.
SUBJECT PROPERTY HAS PRIMARILY BEEN USED FOR AGRICULTURAL HAS BEEN UNDEVELOPED FOR MANY YEARS NOW.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TO CONSTRUCT A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION CALLED RICHMOND COVE PD.
AND DEVELOPMENT IS A CONCEPT THAT ENCOURAGES AND PERMITS VARIATION IN RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS BY ALLOWING DEVIATION IN LOT SIZE OR TYPE OF DWELLINGS, DENSITY, LOT COVERAGE, SETBACKS IN OPEN SPACE FROM THOSE ELEMENTS REQUIRED IN ANY SINGULAR ZONING CLASSIFICATION FOUND IN THE CITY ZONING CODE.
TYPICALLY, THE FDP PROPOSES AND PROPOSES AN 86 UNIT, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT THAT WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ONE PHASE OR THE FDP.
TYPICAL LOTS WITHIN THE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ARE A MIX OF 40, 50 AND 60 FOOT WIDE LOTS. MINIMUM SIZE HOME WILL BE 200 SQUARE FEET, BUT WILL CONSIST OF TWO ENTRANCES WITH AMENITIES, NATURAL PARK AREAS, PASSIVE RECREATION AREAS, STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PONDS AND A PICKLEBALL. DISHES.
IN ORDER TO RECEIVE FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL, THE PROPOSAL MUST MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION ONE EIGHTY FIVE POINT ZERO SIXTY SEVEN OF THE CITY CODE ON REVIEW. IT APPEARS THAT THE REQUEST IS IN PERFORMANCE.
LOCAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECTION ARE SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING ITEMS BEING SUBMITTED WITH CONSTRUCTION PLANS LUMINARY SUBDIVISION PLOT AND A BOUNDARY IN TITLE OPINION.
DEED RESTRICTIONS ESTABLISHING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TECHNICAL COMMENTS GENERATED BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STAFF WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS REPORT SHALL BE OBSERVED AND INCORPORATED INTO THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS.
NATION, PHD FOR TWENTY TWENTY TWO IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL, SUBJECT TO THE STAFF COMMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT.
HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THE WHAT MAY HAVE.
BOARD HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF.
MOYA. A GOOD EVENING, BOARD, MY NAME IS BRUCE MOYO, PRESIDENT OF MTV ENGINEERING, REPRESENTING THE APPLICANT ON THIS.
THIS PROJECT PROBABLY LOOKS FAMILIAR FOR THOSE HERE PREVIOUSLY, THIS IS A KIND OF A REDO OF A PROJECT THAT WE HAD APPROVED HERE AT THIS BOARD AND AT THE CITY COUNCIL FOR A MUCH LARGER PROJECT.
BUT THE THE CONTRACT TO THE NORTH DID NOT GO THROUGH.
SO WE'RE LEFT WITH THE SOUTH PORTION OF THE PROJECT.
SO IT'S STILL A PAVED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, BUT IT'S A LOT LESS INTENSE.
IT'S A LOT SMALLER, LESS UNITS.
HOWEVER, WE'RE STILL MAINTAINING THE OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS AND ALL THE OTHER REQUIREMENTS THAT THE CITY IMPOSED, SO I DIDN'T SEE ANYTHING ON THE COMMENTS THAT WERE OBJECTIONABLE. SO, YOU KNOW, WITHOUT GOING INTO REALLY A WHOLE LOT OF DETAIL, I'M HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAVE, AND WE HOPE THAT YOU WILL RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL. THANK YOU OR HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. MOYA. NO, THANK YOU, BRUCE.
IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OR OPPOSED? BILL? BILL BURTON, FIVE EIGHTY SIX, OCEAN SPRAY STREET, SOUTHWEST, EXCUSE ME.
THE CURRENT PLAN THAT WE HAVE IN THIS DOES NOT LOOK ANYTHING LIKE THE PRELIMINARY PLAN THAT THEY ORIGINALLY PRESENTED TO THIS BOARD.
I I UNDERSTAND THAT THEY LOOK ENTIRELY DIFFERENT.
WHAT I FIND STRANGE ABOUT THAT.
WHAT I FIND STRANGE IS THAT IN MARCH, I ALSO RECEIVED A PLAN THAT LOOKS VERY SIMILAR FROM THEM TO WHAT THEY'RE ACTUALLY PRESENTING NOW.
AND I SPECIFICALLY ASKED THAT QUESTION IS THIS GOING TO BE A CASE OF BAIT AND SWITCH? YOU TELL THE BOARD ONE THING, BUT LATER YOU DO SOMETHING ELSE.
AND THAT APPARENTLY THIS IS THE CASE OF HISTORY REPEATING, LIKE WHAT WAS PREDICTED, IT WAS A CASE OF BAIT AND SWITCH BY THE BATON STANDARD.
SO MY FIRST QUESTION IS WHAT CONSTITUTES A MAJOR CHANGE WHEN YOU GO FROM THIS TO THIS? THEY DON'T LOOK ANYTHING THE SAME AS THE FIRST QUESTION.
IF THIS PROCEEDS FORWARD, WHICH I THINK IT PROBABLY WILL, IS THE SOUTH FENCE GOING TO BE
[00:55:02]
ON THE PROPERTY LINE AND IF NOT, WHO WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LAND MAINTENANCE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THAT FENCE? THAT'S THE QUESTION. QUESTION NUMBER TWO QUESTION NUMBER THREE, EXCUSE ME, THE WALKING TRAILS HAVE COME OUT ON CANAL NUMBER 13 AND THE CITY DRAINAGE.WILL THEY BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC FOR PUBLIC ACCESS? QUESTION NUMBER FOUR.
YOUR FIRST PROPOSAL HAD A SWIMMING POOL IN THE PLAN.
WILL THIS SECOND PLAN? WILL IT HAVE A SWIMMING POOL ON THE SITE? THOSE ARE THE QUESTIONS.
AND I UNDERSTAND GROWTH AND THAT'S GOING TO BE A REALITY OF THE CASE.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU, BILL.
IS THERE ANYONE ELSE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISH TO SPEAK? ROOSTED, YOU WANT TO RESPOND TO THAT.
SO, YEAH, I DON'T REALLY, YOU KNOW, THIS WAS DONE OUT OF NECESSITY.
I DON'T THINK THERE WAS ANY INTENT TO DO ANY BAIT AND SWITCH.
IT WAS, YOU KNOW, WE PROCEEDED, WE THOUGHT WE HAD A CONTRACT ON ALL THE PROPERTY.
THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY SAID, NO, I'M NOT GOING TO EXTEND IT.
I'M NOT GOING TO SELL IT TO YOU.
I'M JUST GOING TO KEEP IT. SO IT WAS WITHDRAWN FROM THE FROM THE FROM THE DEAL.
SO WE WERE LEFT WITH THIS PIECE AND AND WE'RE STILL MEETING ALL THE REQUIREMENTS THAT ARE REQUIRED BY THE CITY CODE AND THE PWD REQUIREMENTS.
WE'RE STILL PROVIDING ALL THE BUFFERS ARE STILL PROVIDING ALL THE OPEN SPACE WHILE STILL PROVIDING ALL THE RECREATION AREA.
SO I DON'T TECHNICALLY IT'S IT DOESN'T ACT ANY DIFFERENT THAN WHAT WE PROPOSED IS JUST A LITTLE BIT SMALLER. SO I WOULD HOPE THAT THAT WOULD BE DESIRABLE, ESPECIALLY FOR THINGS LIKE TRAFFIC AND THOSE THINGS.
SO I'M HOPING THAT, YOU KNOW, YOU WILL APPROVE THIS AND I'M STILL HERE TO ANSWER ANY OTHER QUESTIONS. DID YOU WANT TO RESPOND TO TO BILL'S QUESTION ABOUT THE FENCE AND ABOUT THE ACCESS TO THE WALKING TRAIL? WELL, THE FENCES ARE FENCE, SO WE HAVE TO MAINTAIN IT.
I MEAN, THAT'S LIKE ANYBODY ELSE'S FENCE.
IF YOU PUT UP A FENCE, IT'S YOURS.
THE THE TRAILS ARE AN AMENITY FOR THE RESIDENTS.
THEY'RE NOT. I DON'T KNOW OF ANY DEVELOPMENT THAT'S BEING BUILT NOW THAT HAS OPEN AMENITIES TO THE ENTIRE PUBLIC.
THESE SUBDIVISIONS AREN'T PARTS THERE TO ALLEVIATE THE THE THE LOAD ON EXISTING PARKS BY PROVIDING INTERNAL RECREATION FOR THE RESIDENTS NOW TO OPEN THEM UP FOR EVERYBODY THAT LIVES IN THE AREA. SO THE ANSWER TO THAT WOULD BE NO, IT WOULD NOT BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC.
THANK YOU AS BOARD HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR MOYA.
NONE AT THIS TIME, I'LL CLOSE A PUBLIC HEARING AND BRING THEM BACK TO THE BOARD FOR A MOTION. WHAT CAN I GET A MOTION, PLEASE? MOTION TO APPROVE CASE EFD FOR 2022, SUBJECT TO THE STAFF'S COMMENTS.
SECOND MOTION FROM RICHARD, THE SECOND FROM JAMES.
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? KNOW PERSONALLY, I'M HAPPY TO SEE THAT THIS IS JUST A LOWER DENSITY.
I MEAN, THE TRAFFIC, OF COURSE, IS A CONCERN, BUT IT DOES FALL WITHIN THE LEVEL OF SERVICE DESIGNATED AS GAINER AS A LOCAL COLLECTOR ROAD.
OUR NEXT GUEST, PLEASE? PATRICK.
AFTER IF YOU GET A LITTLE VOICE WEARY, LET ME KNOW IF YOU'D LIKE TO TAKE A SHORT BREAK.
RIGHT. NEXT CASE ON THE AGENDA IS CASE CP FOR TWENTY TWENTY TWO PROPERTY IS LOCATED THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF U.S.
HIGHWAY NUMBER ONE IN POSPISIL AVENUE, NORTHEAST.
SPECIFICALLY, THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOTS ONE 311 BLOCK TWO OF THE TOWN OF.
PALM BAY SUBDIVISION LOCATED IN SECTION TWENTY FOUR TWENTY EIGHT SOUTH RANGE, THIRTY SEVEN EAST BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, LOST TOTAL APPROXIMATELY SEVEN POINT FIFTY SIX ACRES OF PROPERTY. THE IS REQUESTING A SMALL SCALE, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT TO CHANGE THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY BAYFRONT MIXED USE VILLAGE TO USE, EXCUSE ME, BAYFRONT MIXED AFGHANIS.
MELISSA TIMMONS, MANAGER OF SPACE COAST MARINA LLC.
SETTLEMENT, COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING, FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT POLICY.
FLEW TO POINT TO BE STATE'S HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE LOCATED WITH DIRECT ACCESS TO ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR ROADWAYS WITH ACCESS TO EMPLOYMENT CENTERS.
RECREATION AND COMMERCIAL FACILITIES SHALL BE SERVED BY CENTRALIZED WATER AND SEWER FACILITIES. ALL THREE IS TO PROVIDE FOR ECONOMICALLY VIABLE COMMERCIAL AREAS WHICH PROMOTE A SOUND AND DIVERSIFIED LOCAL ECONOMY AND SERVE THE RETAIL AND SERVICE NEEDS OF THE CITY'S RESIDENTS. THIRTY THREE POINT ONE IS TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL COMMERCIAL AREAS BY
[01:00:03]
SIZE, TYPE DISTRIBUTION BASED ON AREA NEED AND THE AVAILABILITY OF SUPPORTING INFRASTRUCTURE. BO'S AMENDMENT APPEARS TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE ABOVE POLICIES BY APPLYING A FUTURE LANGUAGE CATEGORY THAT PROMOTES THESE INITIATIVES.A MIXED USE CATEGORY WILL ALLOW FOR A GREATER INTENSITY AND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT MAXIMUM OF 10 UNITS PER ACRE AUDIENCE.
IT ALSO REQUIRES A MINIMUM 20 PERCENT OF THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT CONSIST OF COMMERCIAL USES. EARNED DESIGNATION OF DMU DOES NOT REQUIRE COMMERCIAL USE.
CITY, WATER AND SEWER ARE AVAILABLE TO THE PROPERTY IN ATLANTA, BUT SOME MAJOR ARTERIAL ROADWAY. VISION OF COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE FUTURE, USE OF THE PROPERTY WILL ALLOW FOR DIRECT ACCESS OF FUTURE RESIDENTS TO EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES.
STARS BELIEVE REDEVELOPMENT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES WILL IGNITE A REBIRTH OF COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY, VIBRANCY THAT IS NEEDED ALONG THE EWS1 CORRIDOR.
OFFICIELLEMENT CASTLE IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN ANY OF THE 40 SQUARE POLYGON'S IDENTIFIED IN THE CITY HAVE. AND SPECIES ARE KNOWN TO INHABIT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY OR ANY THEY WILL NEED TO BE. PROPERTY IS ALSO NOT LOCATED WITHIN HAZARD.
DON'T. THOSE BIG MIXED USE AMENDMENT DOES NOT ADVERSELY IMPACT THE SUPPLY AND VARIETY OF SAFETY AND ATTRACTIVE AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN THE CITY, THE COUNTY WOULD CATEGORY WOULD ALLOW FOR A WIDE VARIETY OF HOUSING TYPES THAT FURTHER CLINICAL.
AND IT WILL NOT CAUSE A LITTLE SERVICE TO FALL BELOW THE STANDARDS ADOPTED FOR THESE SERVICES FOR THE CURRENT PLANNING PERIOD.
CURRENTLY HAS CITY WATER IN CITY SEWER AVAILABLE TO IT? EIGHT INCH WATER MAIN ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SPECIAL AVENUE WEST SIDE OF U.S.
ONE. BOTH OF WHICH ARE ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY.
IT'S ALSO AN EIGHT INCH GRAVITY SEWER MAIN RUNNING UNDERPASS.
POSPISIL ADDICTIONS TO THESE LINES WILL BE EVALUATED DURING THE ADMINISTRATIVE SITEPOINT.
YOU KNOW, THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE SHALL MEET ALL CRITERIA OF THE CITY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE, ALL CRITERIA OF RULE SIXTY TWO THREE 30 LINES WITH THESE PROVISIONS MUST BE SHOWN WITH ENGINEERED SITE PLANS.
SPECIFIC NEW BAFFLE BOX WILL BE NEEDED REGARDLESS OF DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY PRIOR TO ANY STORMWATER DISCHARGE INTO TURKEY CREEK.
WASTE IS PROVIDED BY PUBLIC SERVICES AND THERE'S CAPACITY WITHIN THE.
SCHOOLS PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO BAYFRONT MIXED USE WILL POTENTIALLY ADD MORE HOUSING UNITS, EXISTING B-MOVIE CATEGORY AS THE REQUESTED CATEGORY ALLOWS FOR MORE RESIDENTIAL DENSITY.
WE'LL CONCURRENCY DETERMINATION LETTER FROM THE SCHOOL BOARD AS REQUIRED PRIOR APPROVAL OF ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.
OPEN SPACE. RECREATION, OPEN SPACE ELEMENT ADDRESSES THE CURRENT AND FUTURE RECREATIONAL NEEDS OF THE CITY. THOSE CATEGORY MAY HAVE MORE OF AN IMPACT PARKS STANDARDS DUE TO THE POTENTIAL INCREASE IN RESIDENTIAL DENSITY.
HOWEVER, THE CITY MAINTAINS PUBLIC OWNERSHIP PLANS THAT FAR EXCEED THE MINIMUM THRESHOLD ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE OF TWO ACRES PER 1000 RESIDENTS.
MICHELLE. ISN'T ROADWAY SEGMENTS MUST MEAN A LEVEL OF SERVICE? THE CITIES ADOPTED. THAT IS FDOT 20 20 QUALITY LEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK, ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY VOLUME ISD WE USE FOR THE ANALYSIS SITE SUBMITTED A SPECIAL AVENUE IS CLASSIFIED AS A LOCAL STREET. USE ONE IS CLASSIFIED AS A MAJOR ARTERIAL ROADWAY ON THE MIDDLE OF A DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND TRAFFIC STUDY WILL BE.
ELEMENT, THOSE LANGUAGE CHANGE DOES NOT APPEAR TO INFRINGE UPON THE PROPERTY RIGHTS TO THE APP. NATION.
A CP FOR TWENTY TWENTY TWO WAS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL, SUBJECT TO THE STAFF COMMENTS.
HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
BOARD MAY HAVE. OR HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? DON'T THANK YOU, PATRICK BRUCE.
YOU SEE ME FOR THE NEXT FOUR ITEMS THAT YOU MIGHT GET TIRED OF ME AFTER A WHILE, BUT THANK YOU, BRUCE MOYA AGAIN WITH RNB ENGINEERING REPRESENTING THE APPLICANT.
JUST REALLY SUPER EXCITED ABOUT THIS PROJECT.
AND JUST JUST SO, YOU KNOW, THIS IS STEP ONE OF THE PROCESS.
SO WE'VE GOT THE THE COMP PLAN AMENDMENT.
IS THIS ITEM. TRY NOT TO GO INTO TOO MUCH DETAIL BECAUSE I THINK MOST OF THE DETAIL REALLY BELONGS IN THE ZONING, WHICH IS NEXT.
BUT THIS WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING ON THIS PROPERTY WILL BE A CONDITIONAL USE.
SO YOU WILL SEE THIS AGAIN AND YOU WILL SEE THE ACTUAL PLAN ON WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING TO DO. WHAT WE'RE ASKING FOR TONIGHT IS TO CHANGE THE LAND USE AND THE ZONING SO THAT WE CAN CREATE THAT PLAN BECAUSE IF WE DON'T GET THAT, THEN WE DON'T REALLY KNOW WHAT WE'RE GOING TO DO. BUT IF WE DO, THEN THEN WE WILL PREPARE THAT PLAN SO YOU'LL KNOW EXACTLY WHAT WE'RE GOING TO DO. BUT A LITTLE HISTORY ON THIS PROPERTY, I'M SURE YOU REALLY KNOW MOST OF IT THAT USED TO BELONG TO THE CITY AND THE CITY SOLD THIS PROPERTY TO MY CLIENT, AND HE IS PROPOSING TO DO A BASICALLY A MARINA WITH SOME MIXED COMMERCIAL USES, RESTAURANTS AND RETAIL, AND POSSIBLY SOME RESIDENTIAL.
[01:05:02]
SO WE'RE REQUESTING THE BMO ZONING, MOSTLY BECAUSE THE CITY COUNCIL JUST PASSED THE BMI ZONING WITH A LOT MORE INCENTIVES TO DEVELOP BECAUSE I THINK THIS IS THE AREA THAT THEY REALLY WANT TO FOCUS THIS TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT.SO WE'RE HAPPY TO BRING THAT HERE, BUT WE WANT THE ZONING IN THE LAND USED TO SO THAT WE CAN MAKE THIS PROJECT REALLY A VIABLE AND REALLY, YOU KNOW, JUST SOMETHING REALLY GOOD FOR THE CITY IN THAT AREA THAT REALLY NEEDS IT REALLY BAD.
SO RIGHT NOW, I'M GOING TO KEEP IT SIMPLE AND JUST GO AHEAD AND ASK FOR YOUR APPROVAL ON THE LAND USE, AND THEN I'LL GO INTO A LITTLE MORE DETAIL ON THE ZONING.
I DON'T KNOW IF THERE'S GOING TO BE ANYBODY THAT'S GOING TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST IT.
SO IMPORTANT SUBMISSIONS MR. MOYER. THANK YOU.
THERE ARE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS APPLICATION BILL.
GILBERT BATTEN 586 OCEAN SPRAY STREET, SOUTHWEST, ONE MORE TIME IN THE BAYFRONT MIXED MIXED USE AREA. THIS IS WHERE WE'RE TO TRY AND GET THIS DEVELOPMENT TO HAPPEN.
THAT'S A GOOD THING, I DID HAVE ONE QUESTION, THOUGH, WHEN I LOOK IN THE STAFF AND IT SAID THE BAFFLE BOX IS GOING TO BE REQUIRED FOR THIS, IS THE DEVELOPER GOING TO INSTALL THAT NEW SEVERAL THOUSAND BALLOT BOX OR IS IT GOING TO BE AT THE CITY'S EXPENSE? HE'S GOING TO EXCUSE ME, THE DEVELOPER WOULD BE REQUIRED TO INSTALL THAT APPARATUS? ABSOLUTELY. THANK YOU, PATRICK, IS THERE ANYONE ELSE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK? CHAIRMAN, BEFORE YOU CLOSE IT, I BELIEVE THE FIRST GENTLEMAN THAT SPOKE TONIGHT WAS ACTUALLY REFERRING TO THIS PROJECT.
WANT TO SAY SOMETHING, SIR. STEVE DOW, 14, 14 MAIN STREET, NORTHEAST.
I THINK THE REQUEST I'M ALL FOR PROGRESS IN THE AREA AND NEW BUILDING IN THE BAYFRONT AREA COULD USE SOME DEVELOPMENT, BUT I STILL WOULD LIKE WHATEVER IS DONE THERE TO BE RESIDENTIAL IN NATURE AND TALL BUILDINGS IN THAT SPECIFIC AREA 60 FEET.
I DON'T THINK OUR RESIDENTIAL IN THE SAME WAY EVERYONE WHO LIVES IN THAT AREA WOULD THINK OF THAT AREA.
ALSO, WITH REGARDS TO REZONING, I HATE TO SEE THE ADDITIONAL DENSITY THAT WILL COME WITH THE REZONING AND WOULD PREFER THAT THE CURRENT ZONING REMAIN IN PLACE AND MAYBE A VARIANCE COULD BE SUBMITTED AGAINST THE PREVIOUS OR THE CURRENT ZONING FOR THAT AREA.
ARE YOU AWARE THAT WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT IS THE THE MARINA PROPERTY? I AM OK.
YEAH, IT'S RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET FROM MY HOME.
AND BECAUSE WE HAVEN'T BEEN ABLE TO SEE A PLAN THAT CLEARLY OUTLINES ALL THE SPECIFICS AND WHAT'S GOING WHERE IT LEAVES ME AT A LOSS TO SAY, LET'S INCREASE THE DENSITY AT THIS POINT IN TIME WITHOUT KNOWING MORE ABOUT THE DESIGN AND WHAT WILL BE DONE.
I THINK WE'RE MISSING SOMETHING AND WE GOT OUR FIRST PRESENTATION ABOUT THIS A FEW WEEKS BACK, AND I HAD COMMENTED AT THE TIME, I DON'T THINK WE HAVE ENOUGH TIME BETWEEN NOW AND TONIGHT TO REALLY GET A GOOD FEEL FOR WHAT'S GOING ON WITH THIS PROJECT.
AND MAYBE IF WE KNEW MORE ABOUT THE DETAIL AND WHERE THE STRUCTURES WOULD GO AND WHAT WOULD BE DONE, WHAT WOULD BE CHANGED, IT WOULD GIVE US SOME INSIDE SUFFICIENT ENOUGH TO EITHER SPEAK IN CONFIDENCE ABOUT MOVING FORWARD OR STEPPING BACK A FEW PACES AND SAYING, YEAH, LET'S GO AGAINST THIS.
I'VE TALKED TO A NUMBER OF PEOPLE IN MY NEIGHBORHOOD ABOUT IT TOO, AND THEY SEEM TO BE OPPOSED TO IT.
AND I WAS HOPING I WOULD SEE MORE IN THE EVENING FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD, BUT EVIDENTLY THERE'S NONE OTHERS OTHER THAN MYSELF.
SO ANYWAY, I THINK I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE PLANS FIRST.
I THINK IT'S APPROPRIATE TO SEE MORE ABOUT THE PLANS BEFORE WE GO STRAIGHT FORWARD INTO REZONING THE AREA AND INCREASING THE DENSITY FOR AN EXTENDED PERIOD OF TIME ONCE THAT REZONING IS COMPLETED.
AND I WOULD LIKE TO PERSONALLY, I HAVE A PERSONAL BIAS WHEN I WOULD LIKE TO SEE AT ST.
WHATEVER'S DONE IN THERE BE AS RESIDENTIAL AS POSSIBLE WITHOUT LARGE BUILDINGS IN THE AREA. THANK YOU, SIR.
IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK? I APPRECIATE YOU, SIR. THANK YOU.
BRUCE, DID YOU WANT TO RESPOND TO ANY OF THAT? YES, SIR, THANK YOU. AND AS I MENTIONED BEFORE, WE'LL GET INTO A LITTLE MORE DETAIL ON THE NEXT TIME BECAUSE THIS IS JUST LAND USE.
LAND USE DOESN'T DICTATE BUILDING HEIGHTS.
IT DOESN'T DICTATE HOW, YOU KNOW, BASICALLY DICTATES DENSITY AND SOME OTHER THINGS.
SO I WILL SPEAK SOME MORE ABOUT THAT.
[01:10:01]
I WILL LET YOU KNOW THAT WE DID HAVE THE CITIZENS PARTICIPATION MEETING, AND I DON'T NECESSARILY THINK I AGREE WITH THE PREVIOUS SPEAKER.I THOUGHT WE FOR THE MAJORITY, EVERYBODY WAS PRETTY MUCH IN FAVOR OF THE PROJECT.
THANK YOU, BRUCE. IT'S A POINT I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND BRING IT BACK TO THE BOARD FOR A A MOTION.
BUT WE DO THE EMOTIONAL JUST HAVE A QUESTION FOR.
DIFFERENCE THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE DMU MOVIE AND THE DMU.
THE WITH THE DMV WILL ALLOW FOR NOT.
BULLISH LAWS STILL ALLOW FOR PRIVATE.
RESIDENTS OR FOUR, IS THERE STILL A PRIVATE SITUATION OR IS THAT SOMETHING THAT THE RESIDENTS CAN COME ONTO THE PROPERTY AND ENJOY IT AS OPPOSED TO THE YOU? OR OR ARE WE PRETTY CONSISTENT WITH BOTH, EITHER? EITHER WAY, THE PMU THE MOVIE? ENDING ON DEVELOPER.
IT'S REALLY DEPENDENT UPON WHAT DEVELOPMENT IS GOING TO BE CONSTRUCTED ON THAT PROPERTY.
BOTH ZONING CATEGORIES BE A MOVIE OR VENUE WOULD ALLOW FOR A PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, AND BOTH WOULD ALLOW FOR A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT THAT ALLOWS FOR THE PUBLIC TO COME ON FOR THE COMMERCIAL USES.
SO THEY REALLY ALLOW THE SAME TYPES OF USES.
THE MAJOR DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TWO IS THE INTENSITY OF THOSE USES.
THE COMMERCIAL USES ARE ABOUT THE SAME.
THE DMU ALLOWS FOR MORE RESIDENTIAL DENSITY, IF THAT'S WHAT THE DEVELOPER CHOOSES TO DEVELOP, AND IT DOES ALLOW FOR THE POTENTIAL FOR A TALLER BUILDING TO ACCOMMODATE THAT DEVELOPMENT VERTICALLY WITHIN A SMALLER SITE.
SO THOSE ARE REALLY THE MAJOR DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE TWO CATEGORIES.
THE LIST OF USES IS IS PRETTY SIMILAR.
THE PMU ALSO REQUIRES A MINIMUM OF 20 PERCENT COMMERCIAL USE.
THAT'S CURIOUS. THE B-MOVIE, YOU CAN CHOOSE ONE OF THE ALLOWABLE USES WITHIN THE CATEGORY AND ONLY DO THAT USE.
MIXING OF IT IS THROUGHOUT THE WHOLE DISTRICT, BUT EMU ITSELF REQUIRES THAT MIX ON THAT PROPERTY. MINIMUM OF THE AMOUNT OF USES MUST BE COMMERCIAL UP TO 20 PERCENT.
HEY, IF THERE ARE NO OTHER QUESTIONS, BOARD, CAN I GET A MOTION, PLEASE? AND THAT THE BAYFRONT IS SOMEWHAT.
ALWAYS BEEN. OUR DESIRE, I GUESS, FOR SEEING.
ELEMENT, COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND SEEING, SOMETHING REALLY NICE TO USE, USER FRIENDLY FOR ALL THE RESIDENTS.
GOING TO GO OUT ON A LIMB ON THIS ONE.
THE MOTION TO APPROVE CPP FOR 2022 SECOND.
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON FAVORS, HEY, I I ALL OPPOSED.
MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY THE NEXT CASE, PLEASE, PATRICK.
HE'S ON THE AGENDA IS CP'S FOR TWENTY TWENTY TWO.
THIS IS THE COMPANION REZONING CATEGORY, SAME PROPERTY, SAME APPLICANT FOLLOWING ANALYSIS AS PER CHAPTER 195 ZONING CODE SECTION ONE EIGHTY FIVE POINT TWO ONLY ONE SEE STATES THAT ALL PROPOSE AMENDMENTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THIS BOARD, WHICH SHALL STUDY THE PROPOSAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH ITEMS ONE THROUGH FOUR OF SECTION ONE FIVE POINT TWO OH ONE.
SEE. AND ONE IS THE NEED AND JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CHANGE, BAYFRONT COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT IS A FOUR MILE SECTION OF U.S.
PAVILION BOUNDED BY THE CITY OF MELBOURNE CITY LIMITS TO THE NORTH AND TO THE TOWN OF MALABAR ON THE SOUTH INDIAN RIVER LAGOON MAKES UP THE EASTERN BOUNDARY.
WESTERN LIMIT IS GENERALLY THE FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILROAD, WITH SOME AREAS PUSHING FURTHER. WEST AREA WEST OF THE RAILROAD HAS SHOWN ON THE BCD DISTRICT MAP AS BEING THE KIRBY INDUSTRIAL AREA IN THE PALACE SUBDIVISION.
ALL OF THE BAYFRONT REDEVELOPMENT PLAN IS TO HAVE THE DISTRICT BE DEVELOPED AS AN ATTRACTIVE, INVITING AND ECONOMICALLY SUCCESSFUL MIXED USE ENVIRONMENT THAT PROMOTES A POSITIVE IMAGE AND IDENTITY FOR THE COMMUNITY.
YOU WHEN PERTAINED TO THE REZONING OF THE LAND.
THE EFFECT OF THE CHANGE, IF ANY, ON THE PARTICULAR PROPERTY AND ON SURROUNDING PROPERTIES. OWNING OF THESE PARCELS DOES NOT APPEAR TO HAVE A NEGATIVE EFFECT ON THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND IS BORDERED BY EXISTING ROADWAYS TO THE NORTH AND EAST RAILROAD TO THE WEST AND THE TRICKY CREEK TO THE SOUTH.
FURTHER NORTH, ON THE OTHER SIDE OF ASPECIAL AVENUE, OUR LAND ZONE B-MOVIE DISSIPATES AS THESE LANDS WILL TRADITION TO TRANSITION TO A MORE MIXED USE AND HIGHER INTENSITY DEVELOPMENT OVER TIME.
ANY DEVELOPMENT TO OCCUR MUST BE APPROVED BY WAY OF ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW TO ENSURE THAT DEVELOPMENT ADHERES TO THE BOEREMA DISTRICT THREE ONE PERTAINING TO THE REZONING OF LAND, THE AMOUNT OF UNDEVELOPED LAND IN THE GENERAL AREA IN THE CITY HAVING THE SAME CLASSIFICATION AS THAT REQUESTED.
THERE ARE APPROXIMATELY 66 ACRES OF LAND ZONE B MOVIE, BAYFRONT MIXED USE VILLAGE DISTRICT IN THE CITY.
THERE'S APPROXIMATELY 50 ACRES OF LAND ZONED DMU BAYFRONT MIXED USE.
OR RELATIONSHIP GOES AMENDMENT TO THE PURPOSE OF THE CITY PLAN FOR DEVELOPMENT.
[01:15:01]
APPROPRIATE CONSIDERATION AS TO WHETHER THE PROPOSED CHANGE WILL FURTHER THE PURPOSE OF THIS CHAPTER AND THE COMPANY.THOSE AMENDMENT DOES NOT IMPEDE THE PURPOSES OF CHAPTER ONE, EIGHTY FIVE OR THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING DISTRICT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PROPERTY'S FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF BAYFRONT MIXED USE AND WITH THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN OF THE BAYFRONT REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. THAT RECOMMENDATION, A CPC FOR TWENTY TWENTY TWO, IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL. YOU WOULD HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF.
OK, ONCE AGAIN, BRUCE MOYER WITH NB ENGINEERING REPRESENTING THE APPLICANT.
SO HERE'S WHERE THE, YOU KNOW, THE BMI OWNING A LOT MORE DETAILED THAN THE LAND USE.
SO THANK YOU FOR GETTING US THE LAND USE SO WE CAN HAVE A COMPATIBLE ZONING FOR OUR REQUEST. JUST ONE NOTE.
YOU KNOW, IT IS THE SITE IS SEVEN POINT FIVE SIX ACRES.
A LOT OF THAT IS WATER IS WHERE THE DOCKS ARE.
SO IT'S NOT AS INTENSE AS IT SOUNDS, YOU KNOW, AT THAT LEVEL.
SO SO THE PROPERTY DEVELOPER PROPERTY IS NOT THE WHOLE SEVEN POINT FIVE SIX ACRES, BUT THE PLAN IS AND IT'S VERY SIMILAR TO WHAT WAS PROPOSED TO THE CITY WHEN THE WHEN THE PROPERTY WAS PURCHASED BY THE NOW OWNER IS TO PUT A MARINA ON THIS PROPERTY.
AND, YOU KNOW, HAVE WE GIVEN YOU A PLAN? NO, WE HAVEN'T. BUT OUR PLAN IS TO DO A MARINA AND TO DO A MARINA IN THE ZONING.
IT IS A CONDITIONAL USE, WHICH MEANS THAT WE HAVE TO DO ANOTHER ROUND OF PUBLIC HEARINGS WHERE WE ACTUALLY PRESENT YOU THE PLAN, SO YOU CAN SEE EVERYTHING THAT WE'RE GOING TO DO.
YOU CAN MAKE MORE CONDITIONS OF WHAT WE CAN OR CAN'T DO, WHAT YOU LIKE, WHAT YOU DON'T LIKE. BUT OBVIOUSLY WE DON'T WANT TO UNDERTAKE THAT EXPENSE AND TIME TO DO THAT IF WE DON'T AT LEAST GET THE ZONING AND USE.
SO, YOU KNOW, THE PLAN IS THE PLAN WAS ALWAYS TO GO WITH BMC ZONING, MOSTLY BECAUSE IF YOU HAVE A MARINA, YOU'VE GOT TO HAVE A BOAT STORAGE FACILITY AND THE MOVIE DOES NOT ALLOW YOU TO HAVE A BUILDING HIGH ENOUGH TO DO THAT.
SO WE WOULD WE WANT TO GET THE HEIGHT.
WE LIKE THE BMC ZONING FOR THE FOR THE THE FLEXIBILITY IT GIVES US FOR THE DIFFERENT TYPES OF COMMERCIAL USES.
I MEAN, THIS WILL BE MOSTLY COMMERCIAL.
I MEAN, WE DON'T REALLY WANT TO DO ANY RESIDENTIAL, BUT IF IT'S TO MEET THE MIXED USE REQUIREMENT, WE'LL DEAL WITH THAT WITH STAFF.
IF WE HAVE TO HAVE UNITS, WE WILL, BUT WE WANT TO DO COMMERCIAL.
I THINK THAT'S WHAT THE CITY WANTS.
I THINK THAT'S WHAT THE CITY NEEDS HERE.
AND IF AND WE WOULD BE WISE ENOUGH TO KNOW THAT IF WE'RE GOING TO PUT A TALL BUILDING, WE'RE NOT GOING TO PUT IT ON U.S.
ONE. WE'RE GOING TO PUT IT BY THE RAILROAD TRACKS WHERE IT'S ALREADY, YOU KNOW, YOU ALREADY HAVE A BRIDGE THERE.
IT WON'T STICK OUT. IT'LL BE FAR OFF THE ROAD.
IT WON'T BLOCK IT VIEWS FROM ANY OF THE RESIDENTIAL PEOPLE.
BUT THOSE ARE THE KIND OF DETAILS WE'LL GIVE YOU AT THE CONDITIONAL USE.
BUT THE PLAN IS TO DO A WORKABLE MARINA WITH A RESTAURANT AND RETAIL AND ALL THOSE THINGS THAT WILL REALLY KIND OF BRING THAT AREA TO LIFE.
SO AS LONG AS A LIFETIME BOATER AND BREVARD COUNTY, I'M SUPER EXCITED ABOUT THIS BECAUSE I DON'T THINK THERE'S ENOUGH PLACES ON THE WATER WHERE YOU CAN STOP AND WITH YOUR BOAT, GET A BURGER OR WHATEVER AND HANG OUT AND MAYBE LISTEN TO A LITTLE BIT OF MUSIC OR WHATEVER, WHATEVER THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE.
I DON'T KNOW, BUT WE'LL BE PROVIDING THAT AT THE CONDITIONAL USE.
SO, YOU KNOW, WE OBVIOUSLY RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL AND HAVE ANY QUESTIONS IF YOU HAVE ANY. BOARD HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR MOYA.
YES, PLEASE. ONE OF THE RESIDENTS HAD MENTIONED THAT.
I KNOW THAT'S PROBABLY GOING TO COME UP AT A LATER MEETING.
BUT IS THAT SOMEWHERE NEAR THE HEIGHT THAT YOU'RE LOOKING AT SOMEWHERE AROUND THERE? YEAH. YEAH. YOU.
ANYONE ELSE? YEAH, THANK YOU, BRUCE.
THANK YOU, PHIL.. IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK SPECIFICALLY TO THE ZONING ISSUE? I THINK THIS IS NOT THE RIGHT DEVELOPMENT FOR OUR AREA WITHOUT SEEING FURTHER PLANS IN.
THE BUILDING THAT HE MENTIONS, BRINGING IT CLOSE TO THE RAILROAD TRACKS IS RIGHT IN FRONT OF MY HOME, SO I'M OPPOSED THAT WAY.
I'M ALL FOR DEVELOPMENT, BUT I THINK FOR THIS PROGRESSION, WE NEED TO SEE THE PLANS BEFORE WE VOTE ON THIS.
THAT GIVES MORE DETAIL TO WHAT GOES, WHERE AND WHAT'S GOING TO GO ON.
SO I'M KIND OF AT A LOSS AND YOU WILL SEE THAT LATER AS HE SPOKE.
BUT REZONING, I'M NOT SURE THAT'S THE RIGHT THING FOR THIS AGAIN, BECAUSE IT INCREASES THE DENSITY. THIS IS A RESIDENTIAL AREA WHEN THE COAST GUARD CAME IN AND SET UP THEIR
[01:20:02]
PROJECT IN POLLOCK PARK.WE SEE TONS OF TRAFFIC IN OUR AREA NOW THAT DOESN'T CLEAN UP AFTER ITSELF, AND I END UP CLEANING UP AFTER ALL THE BOATERS WHO COME INTO OUR AREA NOW.
AND WE HAVE A LOT OF PEOPLE WHO COME IN AND TRY TO SPEND THE NIGHT THERE AND WE HAVE TO CALL THE POLICE AND ASK THEM TO COME IN AND IF WE BRING MORE OF THE SAME IN.
I'M SURE WE'LL GET MORE OF THE SAME RESPONSE FROM THOSE KIND OF ISSUES THAT HAVING AN INFLUX OF PEOPLE INTO OUR AREA CAUSES.
I'M ALL FOR BOATING, BUT I'M NOT FOR BRINGING IN A DENSITY SO GREAT THAT WE'RE GOING TO HAVE MORE ISSUES WITH POLICE COMING INTO OUR AREA ON A REGULAR BASIS TO DEAL WITH WHATEVER IS SET UP IN THAT AREA.
AND SO. I'M STILL OPPOSED TO ANYONE ELSE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISH TO SPEAK.
NO, NO, I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND BRING IT BACK TO THE BOARD FOR A MOTION OR WE GET A MOTION, MAYBE I MAKE A COMMENT.
ALL RIGHT. THAT THERE'S A PARK RIGHT BY YOUR HOUSE, THEN BY THE RAILROAD TRACKS THERE, THAT A PARK FOR US RIGHT NOW ON WEST SIDE.
THANK YOU. SHE HAD SOMETHING YOU WANTED.
YEAH. I DID WANT TO RESPOND TO SOME OF THE COMMENTS.
I BELIEVE WE CAN. WE CAN DO ALL THOSE USES IN THE EXISTING ZONING.
WE CAN DO A MARINA. IT'S STILL A CONDITIONAL USE, BUT WE CAN DO MARINA IN THE EXISTING ZONING. SO THAT'S NOT GOING TO CHANGE.
WE COULD STILL DO A RESTAURANT.
WE CAN STILL DO RETAIL THE BMI.
THE BMI JUST GIVES US A LITTLE BIT MORE FLEXIBILITY AND GIVES US THE BUILDING HEIGHT TO DO AND ACTUAL STORAGE FACILITY.
SO WE WILL OBVIOUSLY WE UNDERSTAND HIS CONCERNS AND WE WILL BE CONSIDERING THAT WHEN WE DO OUR LAYOUT TO MINIMIZE ANY IMPACT THAT WE HAVE TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
AND THOSE DETAILS WILL BE PROVIDED TO YOU AT THE TIME OF CONDITIONAL USE.
THANK YOU, CHRIS. OR HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? I WILL SAY THIS. YOU KNOW, IF EVERYONE'S FAMILIAR WITH THIS PROPERTY, IT'S BEEN BLIGHTED FOR A NUMBER OF YEARS. THE MARINA HAS BEEN CLOSED FOR SEVERAL YEARS.
THE CITY HAS BEEN TRYING TO SELL IT FOR QUITE A FEW YEARS TO BE REDEVELOPED WITH THE CITY. YOU KNOW, ANYONE WHO'S WHO'S LISTENING TO WHAT'S BEEN GOING ON WITH THIS CITY COUNCIL FOR SEVERAL YEARS REALIZES THAT THE CITY HAS BEEN LOOKING FOR SOMEONE TO BUY THIS PROPERTY TO REDEVELOP THE MARINA, TO BRING IN SOME RESTAURANT ENTERTAINMENT VENUE TO TO REVITALIZE THIS ENTIRE AREA.
THESE ARE JUST THE FIRST COUPLE OF STEPS TO SEE THAT IS DONE.
SO THAT'S ALL I HAVE TO SAY ABOUT THAT.
CAN I GET A MOTION, PLEASE? MOTION TO APPROVE KPIS FOR 2022.
SECOND. FROM RICHARD SECOND FROM JAMES, ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR SAY I ALL OPPOSED THE MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY.
PATRICK. IT'S ON THE AGENDA IS CP FIVE. TWENTY TWENTY TWO SUBJECT PROPERTIES ARE LOCATED SOUTH OF AND ADJACENT TO ORANGE BLOSSOM TRAIL, NORTHEAST IN THE VICINITY WEST OF U.S.
HIGHWAY ONE. THERE ARE FOUR PARCELS THAT ARE INCLUDED IN THIS REQUEST, TWO OF WHICH HAVE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ON THEM.
ANALYSIS FOR CHAPTER ONE AND THREE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REGULATIONS SECTION TWENTY THREE POINT ONE B THE PURPOSE AND INTENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS TO ENCOURAGE THE MOST APPROPRIATE USE OF LAND AND RESOURCES, PROMOTE THE HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE COMMUNITY, AND THEN USE ELEMENT ELEMENT GOLIATH.
ALL YOU WANT IS TO ENSURE A HIGH QUALITY, DIVERSIFIED LIVING ENVIRONMENT THROUGH THE EFFICIENT DISTRIBUTION OF COMPATIBLE LAND USES.
AND THEN USE TO GO TO IS TO PROVIDE FOR AND MAINTAIN VIABLE NEIGHBORHOODS IN RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT TO MEET THE EXISTING AND FUTURE NEEDS OF THE RESIDENTS OF PALM BAY.
WELL, I YOU THREE IS TO PROVIDE FOR ECONOMICALLY VIABLE COMMERCIAL AREAS WHICH PROMOTE A SOUND AND DIVERSIFIED LOCAL ECONOMY AND SERVE THE RETAIL AND SERVICE NEEDS OF THE CITY'S RESIDENTS. IF YOU GOAL NUMBER EIGHT IS TO PROVIDE FOR A DIVERSIFIED AND SELF-SUSTAINING PATTERN OF LAND USE THAT SUPPORT THE PRESENT AND FUTURE POPULATION OF THE CITY OF PALM BAY. W PARCELS ARE LOCATED WITHIN BAYFRONT VILLAGE SPECIAL CHARACTER DISTRICT, WHICH IS WITHIN THE BAYFRONT REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT.
ALL OF THE BAYFRONT VILLAGE DISTRICT IS TO CREATE A PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY WATERFRONT COMMUNITY WITH IMPROVED NARROW STREETS PATHWAYS LEADING TO PUBLIC SPACES, ATTRACTIVE VIEWS AND A WATERFRONT THEME.
THE GOAL OF THE BAYFRONT REDEVELOPMENT PLAN IS TO HAVE THE DISTRICT TO BE DEVELOPED AS AN ATTRACTIVE AND VITAMIN FIGHTING IN ECONOMICALLY SUCCESSFUL MIXED USE ENVIRONMENT.
THE PROPOSAL PROMOTES A POSITIVE IMAGE AND IDENTITY FOR THE COMMUNITY.
INTENDED USE FOR THE FIVE POINT ZERO FIVE ACRE PROPERTY IS A MIX OF MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND COMMERCIAL USES.
[01:25:02]
THOSE LAND USE AND LIMIT WOULD BE CONSIDERED COMPATIBLE.THE CHANGE WILL ALLOW FOR A HIGH QUALITY DIVERSIFIED LIVING ENVIRONMENT AND WILL FURTHER THESE GOALS BY PROVIDING A MIX OF ALLOWABLE USES ON A PROPERTY THAT HAS BEEN UNDEVELOPED FOR MANY YEARS. SURVATION ELEMENT.
PROPERTIES NOT LOCATED WITH ANY OF THE FLORIDA SCRIPTURE, POLYGON'S IDENTIFIED ON THE CITY AS HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN AND NO OTHER PROTECTED SPECIES ARE KNOWN TO HAVE IT THE PROPERTY THERE ARE ANY PROTECTED SPECIES FOUND THEY WILL NEED TO BE MITIGATED FOR STATE AND FEDERAL. PROPERTY IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN THE COASTAL MANAGEMENT AREA.
AMENDMENT DOES NOT ADVERSELY IMPACT THE SUPPLY AND VARIETY OF SAFE, DECENT, ATTRACTIVE AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING WITHIN THE CITY.
INSTEAD, IT WILL SERVE TO CREATE ADDITIONAL MULTIFAMILY HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES NEEDED IN PALM BAY INFRASTRUCTURE.
FACILITIES CHANGE WILL NOT CAUSE THE LEVEL OF SERVICE TO FALL BELOW THE STANDARDS ADOPTED IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THESE SERVICES FOR THE CURRENT PLANNING PERIOD.
PUBLIC WATER AND SEWERAGE FACILITIES ARE AVAILABLE AT THE SITE.
IF DEVELOPED, THE OWNER DEVELOPER WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR EXTENDING SERVICE TO THE SITE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT CITY REGULATIONS.
DRAINAGE. BRITISH PLAN MUST BE PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT REGULATIONS AND APPROVED BY THE CITY, ALONG WITH APPROPRIATE OUTSIDE AGENCIES, INCLUDING THE ST.
JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT.
ANY PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM WILL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY DURING THE SITE PLANNING PROCESS.
AND GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION, PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
LIMIT TO BAYFRONT MIXED USE WILL ADD HOUSING UNITS, SOME IMPACTS TO THE PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM AREA ARE ANTICIPATED.
HOWEVER, CONSIDERING THE ADJACENT CONCURRENCY SERVICE AREAS, THERE ARE SUFFICIENT CAPACITY. RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE.
THE AMENDMENT WOULD INCREASE THE DEMAND FOR RECREATION SERVICES AS COMPARED TO THE EXISTING BAYFRONT MIXED USE VILLAGE DUE TO POTENTIAL INCREASE IN DENSITY.
HOWEVER, THE REQUESTED USE WOULD NOT EXCEED THE EXISTING PARKLAND OR RECREATIONAL LEVEL SERVICE STANDARDS FOR THE PLANNING AREA.
ASIAN. DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY HAVE SOME PLANS TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ARE TO PROVIDE A SAFE, BALANCED, EFFICIENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM, MAINTAINS A ROADWAY LITTLE SERVICE AND ADEQUATELY SERVES THE NEEDS OF THE COMMUNITY.
DEVELOPED A TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS WILL BE REQUIRED TO DETERMINE ANY NEGATIVE IMPACTS ON THE EXISTING TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM, ALONG WITH ANY SUGGESTED IMPROVEMENTS WHICH WILL BE TAKEN UNDER CONSIDERATION DURING THE PLANNED REVIEW PROCESS.
PROPERTY RIGHTS ELEMENT PROPOSAL DOES NOT CHANGE EXCUSE ME, NOT CHANGE OR APPEAR TO INFRINGE UPON THE PROPERTY RIGHTS OF THE.
[INAUDIBLE] ACP TWENTY TWENTY TWO IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL, ANSWERING ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE AND BRUCE IS STILL.
THE BOARD HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF.
THANK YOU, PATRICK. ONE MORE TIME, BRUCE.
TO ME, AGAIN, BRUCE MOYER WITH MVP ENGINEERING REPRESENTING THE APPLICANT.
THIS IS VERY SIMILAR TO THE LAST REQUEST AS FAR AS PROCEDURE OR THE FIRST STEP IS THE LAND USE. WE HAVE THE MOVIE WE WANT TO GO TO THE EMU LAND USE.
SO THAT'S THE FIRST STEP IN TYPICAL WITH.
AND I KNOW THIS KIND OF CAME UP WITH THE LAST ONE THAT WE HAVEN'T PROVIDED YOU ANYTHING WELL. TYPICALLY, WHEN YOU GO FOR STRAIGHT ZONING AND STRAIGHT LAND USE CHANGES, IT'S VERY RARE THAT YOU WOULD GET A PLAN IN ANY MUNICIPALITY HERE IN THE COUNTY.
IT'S BASICALLY A REQUEST SO THAT WE CAN MOVE TO THE NEXT LEVEL TO GET YOU THAT PLAN.
SO THIS IS A KIND OF A UNIQUE PARCEL.
IT'S IT'S PART OF AN AREA THAT THAT HAS BEEN LOOKED AT FOR A WHILE BACK WHEN IF YOU REMEMBER STUART BUCHANAN WAS THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR, THERE WAS THE THE THE WORK THAT WAS DONE FOR THE POND TO THE WEST.
THAT WAS DONE FOR SEVERAL REASONS, ONE THAT WAS DONE TO TO DO SOME TREATMENT MITIGATION BECAUSE A LOT OF THAT WATER WAS GOING DIRECTLY INTO THE INDIAN RIVER LAGOON AND ST.
JOHN'S GAVE THE CITY A GRANT TO BUILD THAT POND OR THE DEP DID.
I'M SORRY. AND WHAT WE DID WHEN WE DESIGNED THAT IS WE ACTUALLY GAVE SOME INCENTIVE TO THIS PROPERTY TO THE EAST AND PROVIDED SOME TREATMENT FOR THAT PROPERTY SO THAT IT COULD ENCOURAGE THIS SUCH THING.
YOU KNOW, SUCH AN INVESTOR TO COME IN AND ACTUALLY MAKE THIS SEEM ATTRACTIVE TO THEM TO COME IN AND DO SOMETHING. SO THE THE THE CLIENT HAS THIS UNDER CONTRACT THERE.
THEY'RE VERY FAMILIAR WITH PALM BAY.
THESE ARE THE SAME PEOPLE THAT BROUGHT TO THE TWO HOTELS BY THE BASS PRO SHOP.
THEY'RE THE SAME PEOPLE THAT ARE BUILDING PARASOL ON DAIRY ROAD AND PALM BAY ROAD.
THEY'RE BUILDING THE THE AIRPORT, THE HOTEL AT THE AIRPORT.
WE'VE WORKED WITH THEM FOR EVER SINCE THEY CAME TO PALM BAY EVER SINCE SANDY ANDERSON BROUGHT THEM HERE. SO WE'RE REALLY EXCITED THAT THEY HAVE SUCH AN INTEREST IN PALM BAY AND THEY ARE BASED ON THE MEETINGS THAT WE'VE HAD WITH THE 2040 VISION.
WITH THE CITY IN THIS AREA, YOU KNOW, WE REALLY LISTEN AND THIS COULD REALLY BE THE CATALYST TO GET SOME THINGS GOING.
WE KNOW WE HAVE SOME RESIDENTIAL COMING IN THE AREAS OF THE NORTH AND SOUTH.
SO WE'RE REALLY STARTING TO SEE SOME THINGS HAPPENING.
AND SO THEY FEEL AT THIS TIME THIS WOULD BE A GREAT PROJECT TO COME IN HERE IF WE CAN GET THE ZONING AND LAND USE AND BRING A NICE MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT WITH SOME RESIDENTIAL AND
[01:30:06]
SOME COMMERCIAL FOR THIS AREA TO REALLY KIND OF GET THIS THIS AREA GOING.ONE THING THAT'S GREAT ABOUT IT IS THERE'S REALLY NOBODY TO THE WEST OF US.
IT'S JUST THE POND AND THE RAILROAD TRACKS.
WE'VE GOT COMMERCIAL AROUND US.
WE HAVE SOME RESIDENTIAL, BUT FOR THE MOST PART, IT'S EITHER VACANT OR IT'S A COMMERCIAL.
SO WE THINK IT'S A GREAT AREA.
WE'D LIKE TO, YOU KNOW, OBVIOUSLY RESPECT REQUESTS FOR APPROVAL FOR THE LAND USE OF THIS TIME, AND WE CAN GET TO SOME ZONING ISSUES ON THE NEXT ITEM IF YOU SO DESIRE.
SO I'M HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS IF YOU HAVE THE BOARD OR HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR BRUCE. THANK YOU.
THERE, ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE THAT WISHED TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS APPLICATION.
IT'S GOOD NIGHT TO GET INTO THE BOARD AND STUFF, I LOOK FOR THE GUARD FROM 60 TO 80 MAIN STREET. WELL, I MUST SAY IT'S BEEN A REAL GOOD FEELING TONIGHT TO SEE THIS DEVELOPMENT GOING ON. AS I SAID, I'VE BEEN IN THIS COMMUNITY FOR ABOUT 30 YEARS AND BEEN PROMISED ABOUT THIS DEVELOPMENT.
LET'S HOPE YOU GET GET RID OF THAT HOMELESS GUY IN THE BACK THERE.
YEAH, WE GOT WE GOT A HOMELESS GUY IN THE BACK LIVE FOR SO MUCH YEARS.
YOU KNOW, I THINK BUT GOOD DEVELOPMENT AND I I GOT SOME PROPERTY IN MORRIS TOO, SO I'LL BE TRYING TO DEVELOP ITSELF.
SO I LOOKING FORWARD FOR THIS AND I THINK IT'S A GOOD IDEA.
IS THERE ANYONE ELSE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISH TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS APPLICATION? WELL, I PROPOSED, SIR.
SIXTEEN THIRTY TWO WARNER DRIVE AND I OWN THE PROPERTY THAT'S JUST RIGHT ADJACENT TO THIS. WE HAVE A BEAUTIFUL LITTLE BROOK THAT RUNS THROUGH THERE.
IT'S A NATURAL BROOK THAT THE CITY HAS PUMPED THE WATER IN THROUGH THERE NOW, TOO.
MY CONCERN, THOUGH, IS THAT MY PROPERTY LINE RUNS RIGHT THROUGH THE MIDDLE OF OUR DRIVEWAY. WE HAVE A SHARED DRIVEWAY, SO WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN TO OUR ACCESS AND EGRESS FROM OUR PROPERTY WHEN THIS DEVELOPMENT HAPPENS? WE ALSO HAVE ARTESIAN WELL ON A PROPERTY THAT WE HAVE RIGHTS TO, AND I DON'T KNOW WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN TO THAT AS WELL.
I'VE BEEN WAITING FOR THIS AREA TO DEVELOP.
MY MOTHER IN LAW TOLD ME, OH, YOU DON'T WANT TO BUY THERE, THAT THAT PROPERTY IS TAKES FOREVER FOR ANYTHING TO HAPPEN THERE.
AND WELL, UNFORTUNATELY, SHE DIED AND IT STILL HASN'T HAPPENED.
I'M I'M EXCITED THAT THERE'S GOING TO BE SOME DEVELOPMENT, BUT I'M ALSO CONCERNED ABOUT WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN TO MY PROPERTY SINCE IT'S RIGHT ADJACENT TO IT AS WELL.
WHAT EFFECT DOES THIS HAVE ON MY TAXES? THE LAST TIME THERE WAS A ZONING CHANGE, MY TAXES WENT UP 500 PERCENT, SO I CAN'T AFFORD ANOTHER 500 PERCENT INCREASE ON MY TAXES.
I DO HAVE A QUICK CLAIM DEED ON THE PROPERTY THAT AS IT GOES THROUGH THE UP THE DRIVEWAY AND ONE THIRD OF THE GARAGE THAT'S IN THAT THAT THAT GARAGE IS IN THAT ZONE.
SO I DON'T CARE ABOUT THE GARAGE THAT HE CAN TAKE IT DOWN, BUT IT'S JUST AN ISSUE THAT MIGHT COME UP AS WELL, THAT WE DO OWN PART OF THAT GARAGE.
I WAS CONCERNED ABOUT THE THE THE REMOVING OF THE TERM VILLAGE FROM THE ZONING AND WHAT EFFECT THAT HAS, I THINK BRUCE HAS BEEN ABLE TO EXPLAIN THAT TO SOME DEGREE, BUT I'M CONCERNED ABOUT WHAT IT'S ACTUALLY GOING TO DO WHEN THEY START TO DEVELOP.
OK. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISH TO SPEAK? MR., DO YOU WANT TO RESPOND TO THAT? YES, MR. CHAIRMAN, THANK YOU.
SO RIGHT NOW ON THE AS FAR AS ACCESS IS CONCERNED, I'LL ADDRESS THAT FIRST ON THE EAST SIDE OF OUR PROPERTY.
WE DO NOT OWN INTO THAT RIGHT AWAY.
THERE IS AN EXISTING 20 FOOT RIGHT AWAY ON WATER DRIVE THAT WOULD REMAIN.
SO ANYBODY THAT ACCESSES THAT CAN CONTINUE TO ACCESS THAT BUY, RIGHT, SO WE'RE NOT GOING TO CHANGE THAT. WE DON'T OWN IT.
WE CAN'T BLOCK IT. WE CAN'T KEEP HIM FROM ACCESSING HIS PROPERTY SO THAT THAT WON'T HAPPEN. THE THE WELL, I'M NOT SURE IF HE'S TALKING ABOUT.
[01:35:05]
I BELIEVE THERE MIGHT BE A FREE FLOWING WELL OUT THERE ON THE PROPERTY AND THE WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WILL MAKE US ABANDON THAT BECAUSE I DON'T LIKE AQUIFER OR WATER JUST GOING OUT INTO THE RIVER.IT'S NOT A GOOD THING WHETHER IT'S BEEN HAPPENING FOR FIVE YEARS OR 50 YEARS, YOU KNOW, FREE FLOWING WELLS OR A BAD THING FOR THE RIVER.
I GUESS YOU COULD CALL IT A BROOKE, YOU KNOW, AND I THINK IT'S JUST THAT, WELL, FEEDING WATER INTO THE RIVER THAT GOES UNDERNEATH US ONE INTO THE RIVER, SO WE'LL BE GETTING RID OF THAT. YOU KNOW, MAYBE THAT CHANGED THE CHARACTER A LITTLE BIT, BUT THAT'S JUST SOMETHING THAT STATE WILL REQUIRE US TO DO.
AS FAR AS THE VILLAGE, YOU KNOW, THAT'S AN INTERESTING POINT, BECAUSE I DON'T THINK THAT THE LONG TERM GOAL FOR THIS IS TO REALLY THAT VILLAGE CONCEPT ANYMORE.
I THINK THAT VISION HAS CHANGED.
I THINK IN ORDER TO GET PEOPLE TO COME HERE, I THINK YOU'VE GOT TO GIVE THEM THE INCENTIVE TO TO GET THE DENSITY THAT THEY NEED TO MAKE IT A REAL PROJECT AND TO GET PEOPLE TO COME HERE, YOU KNOW, BRING INCOME TO THE AREA.
DO YOU KNOW BUILDINGS AND NEW BUILDINGS AND GET PEOPLE TO COME HERE? SO I DON'T I'M NOT SURE IF THE VILLAGE CONCEPT IS REALLY THE GOAL BASED ON WHAT I'M HEARING AT SOME OF THESE VISION MEETINGS.
SO THAT WILL, YOU KNOW, IT'S NOT WHAT WE'RE WE'RE TRYING TO ACHIEVE HERE.
I THINK THAT WAS MOST OF THE COMMENTS.
WAS THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS THAT I MISSED? I THINK THAT PRETTY MUCH COVERS EVERYTHING.
THANK YOU. THANK YOU. AT THIS POINT, I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
PATRICK, YOU HAD SOMETHING YOU WANTED TO ADD.
I JUST WANTED TO KIND OF ECHO WHAT MR. MOYERS JUST STATED EARLIER.
THE RETENTION POND THE CITY OWNS BETWEEN BEAUTY AND THE RAILROAD.
I WAS ALSO HERE WORKING WITH MR. BUCHANAN WHEN WE WENT ON THAT PROJECT AND THAT I CAN CONFIRM THAT DEFINITELY THAT ON WAS OVERSIZE TO ACCOMMODATE FLOW FROM DEVELOPMENT TO THE EAST, TO INCENTIVIZE THAT DEVELOPMENT, ALLOW MORE OF THE LAND TO BE DEVELOPED AND NOT HAVE TO HAVE A POND RIGHT ON THAT SITE. AND ON THAT PROJECT.
SO I'M CONFIRMING THAT MY STATED AS WELL AS THE BAYFRONT MIXED USE VILLAGE THAT'S THERE NOW, THE ZONING YOU SEE IN THE LIGHT PURPLE THAT WAS A VISION THAT THE CITY HAD 20 YEARS AGO, AND IT WAS A GOOD VISION.
DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS CHANGE OVER TIME.
CITIES WANT TO BECOME SOMETHING ELSE BECAUSE THE VISION YOU HAD BEFORE MAY NOT HAVE WORKED. YOU CAN SEE THIS PROPERTY AND THE PROPERTIES AROUND HAVE REMAINED VACANT FOR A VERY LONG TIME, AND THE VISIONS THAT WE'RE WORKING ON NOW AND CREATING NOW AND WITH OUR CONSULTANTS, A LOT OF THE WORK THAT THEY'VE BEEN DOING, SO MANY CONSULTANTS THAT WE HIRED TO WORK ON REDOING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ALL OF THE PUBLIC WORKSHOPS WE'VE HAD, VISION HAS BEEN TO CREATE AND USE THE WORD DOWNTOWN, BUT TO CREATE AN AREA THAT CAN ALLOW FOR MORE VIBRANCY AND A REDEVELOPMENT OF A U.S.
ONE CORRIDOR THAT HAS REMAINED BLIGHTED OVER THE DISTANCE OF THE PROPERTY, NOT INDIVIDUAL LOTS. THERE'S A LOT OF BEAUTIFUL PROPERTIES OUT HERE.
BUT OVERALL, THE GOAL IS TO DEVELOP THIS YEAR ONE CORRIDOR, WHICH HAS BEEN UNDERUTILIZED FOR SEVERAL DECADES, PARTICULARLY ON THE WEST SIDE OF EWS1 AS WELL.
THANK YOU, PATRICK. AT THIS POINT, THEY WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND BRING IT BACK TO THE BOARD FOR A MOTION.
HE APPROVES FIVE TWENTY TWENTY TWO.
LOOK, I'M FROM LEEDS, SECOND FROM RICHARD, ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION.
ALL IN FAVOR SAY I OPPOSE THE MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY OUR LAST AND FINAL CASE, PATRICK. AS CASE ON AGENDA'S CASE, CPC FIVE, 20, 20 TO BACKGROUND IS THE SAME, SAME PROPERTY, SAME APPLICANT.
THE APPLICANT STATES THE JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CHANGE IN ZONING IS TO CHANGE THE ZONING DISTRICT TO ENABLE THE DEVELOPER TO CONSTRUCT A PROPOSED MULTIFAMILY AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT. BAYFRONT MIXED USE ZONING DISTRICT WILL ALLOW FOR A MIX OF COMMERCIAL MULTIFAMILY USES AND ZONING WILL ALLOW FOR A TRANSITION BETWEEN THE EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES IN THE AREA AND HELP TO REVITALIZE THE AREA.
DESIGNATION OF THE BOEREMA ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROPERTIES IS COMPARABLE TO SURROUNDING AREA COMPATIBLE, AND IT'S CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S DESIRE AND PLAN FOR REDEVELOPMENT IN THE DISTRICT.
APPROXIMATELY 50 ACRES OF DMU BAYFRONT MIXED USE ZONE IS LOCATED WITHIN CITY LIMITS.
WE BELIEVE THAT THIS AMENDMENT WILL FURTHER THE PURPOSES OF CHAPTER 185 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND STAFFS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL.
HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.
WHAT HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? DON, THANK YOU, PATRICK.
MUST BE DOING SOMETHING RIGHT BECAUSE BILL DIDN'T COME UP AND SAY ANYTHING AT THE LAST ONE. SO MAYBE I SPOKE TOO SOON.
[01:40:04]
SO, YEAH, SO THIS IS THE ZONING THAT WOULD BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE NOW RECOMMENDED APPROVED LAND USE.YOU KNOW, WE'RE REALLY EXCITED THAT THE CITY HAD THE VISION TO CHANGE THE BME ZONING.
I THINK IT'S MADE IT ATTRACTIVE TO WEAR THIS KIND OF PROJECT WILL ACTUALLY BECOME A REALITY IN THIS AREA WILL REALLY START TO BECOME THE AREA THAT IT REALLY SHOULD BE AND WHAT THE CITY IS ENVISIONING FOR THE 2040 VISION.
SO WE'RE ASKING FOR THE REZONING SO THAT WE CAN HAVE THE FLEXIBILITY TO MAKE THIS A VIABLE PROJECT AND MAKE IT SOMETHING REALLY NICE FOR THIS AREA.
SO IT'S HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS IF YOU HAVE ANY BOARD, HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. MOIR. THANK YOU.
THANK YOU. ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISH TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS APPLICATION OR OPPOSED. NONE OF THOSE PUBLIC HEARING AT THIS TIME BRING IT BACK TO THE BOARD FOR A MOTION. AND YOU APPROVED CPC FIVE TWENTY TWENTY TWO FROM LEADER'S SECOND FROM RICHARD. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR, SAY I ALL OPPOSED.
THAT CONCLUDES THIS EVENING'S MEETING.
OUR NEXT MEETING WILL BE FEBRUARY 2ND.
MEETING IS ADJOURNED. MR. CHAIRMAN, I DID WANT TO ADDRESS THE BOARD.
REAL QUICK, NOTHING RELATED TO CITY MATTERS.
YOU'LL NOTICE CHRIS BALTER WAS NOT HERE TONIGHT.
CHRIS HAS RESIGNED FROM THE CITY.
THAT'S WHY HE'S NOT HERE. AND.
IS MORE. LAST DAY IS TOMORROW.
WELL, I'M GOING TO BE SORRY TO SEE YOU GO.
I WANTED TO SAY THANK YOU TO THE BOARD.
YOU GUYS HAVE HAD THE VISION, THE DILIGENCE AND THE PATIENCE TO PUT UP WITH THE TWO OF US. WE APPRECIATE, YOU KNOW, YOUR CANDOR, YOUR HONESTY AND YOUR INTEGRITY ON THIS BOARD VERY MUCH APPRECIATED. WELL, I WANT TO THANK YOU, YOU KNOW, FOR YOUR YOUR YOUR COOPERATION WITH THIS BOARD FOR ALL YOUR HARD WORK, WHICH I'M WELL AWARE OF AND I WISH YOU NOTHING BUT THE BEST.
THANK YOU, PATRICK.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.