Link

Social

Embed

Disable autoplay on embedded content?

Download

Download
Download Transcript

[00:00:02]

TO CALL TO ORDER THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE MEETING OF DECEMBER 21, 2020 TO 1:00 PM.

[CALL TO ORDER]

MY NAME IS JAMES BEADLE.

I'M THE PERSON THAT WAS APPOINTED BY THE CITY OF PALM BAY TO ACT AS A SPECIAL MAGISTRATE TO CONSIDER PETITIONS FOR RELIEF.

REDUCTIONS AND CODE ENFORCEMENT MEANS.

GENERAL PROCEDURE IS, IS THAT EVERYBODY THAT'S GOING TO BE PRESENTING TESTIMONY NEEDS TO BE SWORN IN AND THE CLERK WILL DO THAT SHORTLY.

AND THEN THE APPLICANT, AS THE REQUESTER WILL COME UP AND IDENTIFY THEMSELVES AND BASICALLY STATE THE POSITION OF WHY YOU'RE ASKING FOR THE RELIEF THAT YOU'RE ASKING FOR. THE CITY WILL THEN RESPOND TO THAT AND PRESENT ITS SIDE OF THE STORY OR THE CASE, AND THEN THE APPLICANT WILL HAVE THE ABILITY TO RESPOND AFTER THE CITY PRESENTS ITS CASE.

BUT HE HAS ANY QUESTIONS I CAN ASK WHEN IT'S TIME FOR THEM TO COME UP.

BUT AT THIS POINT, I'LL TURN IT OVER TO THE CLERK.

[SWEARING IN]

YOU. PLEASE STAND AND RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.

SWEAR TO TELL THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH, AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH, SO HELP YOU GOD.

THANK YOU. MAYBE SHE DID.

OUR FIRST CASE TO BE HEARD IS SIB 18481, DASH ONE SEVEN AND SEB 2244621 AT 2850 SHAWANDA AVENUE

[PETITION FOR RELIEF]

NORTHEAST. AND THIS IS A REPAIR AGREEMENT EXTENSION.

I WOULD LIKE TO APOLOGIZE THAT I'M BACK AGAIN, BUT I HAVE NOW DISCOVERED THAT THE PROBATE IS IN BREVARD COUNTY, AND I HAVE THAT FOR YOU.

AND I RECEIVED AN ADDENDUM TO THE SAILING CONTRACT, AND IT SAYS THE CLOSING DATE WILL BE TEN DAYS AFTER THE PROBATE PROCESS HAS BEEN COMPLETED.

PROBATE WILL TAKE NO LONGER THAN 30 DECEMBER 31ST.

I GOT. UH, I DON'T HAVE A.

OBJECTION TO THAT. I HAVE ONE QUESTION.

THE PROBATE WILL BE DONE ON DECEMBER THE 31ST, SUPPOSEDLY.

YES, SUPPOSEDLY.

SO MY QUESTION TO YOU IS, IS ONCE THAT'S DONE, HOW MUCH TIME ARE YOU GOING TO NEED TO COMPLETE THE REPAIR? WELL, I DISCOVERED THAT THERE ARE SOME CAMPERS NOW THERE THAT ARE LIVING IN THE BACKYARD AND HAVE MOVED IN TO THE AREA THAT IS COMPLETELY UNINHABITABLE.

I DID CONTACT THE POLICE.

THEY SAID THEY COULDN'T DO ANYTHING BECAUSE I DIDN'T OWN THE PROPERTY.

SO I KNOW IT'S TYPICALLY 120 DAYS, BUT WITH THE LEGAL TO GET THESE PEOPLE OFF IS GOING TO BE A NIGHTMARE.

I HOPE NOT.

NO. MAYBE THE POLICE MAY DO SOMETHING DIFFERENT ONCE YOU HAVE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY TOO.

SO. OCH, I HOPE SO.

I DON'T KNOW THAT, BUT I'M JUST SAYING.

WHAT? YOU'RE JUST TOLD ME IS, IS THEY'RE NOT GOING TO DO ANYTHING BECAUSE YOU DON'T OWN THE PROPERTY.

YES, THAT'S WHAT THEY SAID.

AND THEN THE CURRENT RESIDENT IN ONE OF THE PLACES, SHE HAD A LEASE AND SHE TOLD THE POLICE, OH, I KNOW, I'M NOT SUPPOSED TO BE HERE. SO DO YOU HAVE AN ISSUE WITH 150 DAYS? ALL IN AN ORDER TO EXTEND 150 DAYS.

OKAY. THANK YOU.

OUR NEXT CASE TO BE HEARD IS CV 2064920 AND 19609.

DASH ONE NINE AT 20 608 PERALTA DRIVE SOUTHEAST.

HOW YOU DOING? ALL RIGHT.

IDENTIFY YOURSELF AND YOUR ADDRESS.

MY NAME IS ROBERT JOHNSON.

I HAVE A LETTER HERE. IT'S ACTUALLY MY MOTHER'S PROPERTY, BUT I DON'T NEED IT.

SO THIS ADDRESS IS THE PROPERTY THAT I GREW UP AT SINCE 94.

AND 2008.

FATHER PASSED AWAY.

SO. BUT ANYWAYS, IN OH EIGHT, MY FATHER PASSED AWAY DECEMBER 13TH.

AND I STARTED A LONG BUSINESS.

AT A KID IN 2011.

AND. THEY'RE ON 2011.

I MOVED OUT, GOT MY OWN PLACE.

2018, MY MOM OFFERED ME.

THE BUY THE HOUSE.

HONESTLY, I'VE NEVER.

I'VE NEVER WELL, I'VE NEVER GOTTEN ANYTHING IN THE MAIL.

[00:05:03]

CODE VIOLATIONS.

I WASN'T THERE FOR. SIX YEARS.

ANYWAYS. I'M TRYING TO BUY THE HOUSE NOW.

PRETTY MUCH EVERYTHING'S DONE.

READY TO CLOSE? JUST THIS CAME UP.

OTHER. NOTICES WOULD HAVE BEEN DIRECTED TO HER.

YEAH. WOULDN'T SAY EVER RECEIVED.

IT'S A BIG AMOUNT, SO.

BOUGHT THE LOT NEXT DOOR. I'VE FENCED IT ALL AND.

DRIVEWAY NEXT DOOR WITH A CULVERT PIPE PULLED PERMITS.

ROLL THAT, I GUESS.

I GUESS EVERYTHING'S IN COMPLIANCE NOW.

CITY'S POSITION.

PLEASE IDENTIFY YOURSELF.

ANGELICA SNEED, CODE COMPLIANCE OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF PALM BAY.

AND THE CITY HAS NO OBJECTION.

AND THE REDUCTION OF THIS LANE WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT ADMINISTRATION FEES ARE COLLECTED, WHICH IS $750 THE CITY IS ALSO ASKING FOR.

I'M GOING TO DO THE EACH CASE.

SO FOR CASE NUMBER 20649, ASKING FOR 13% OF THE FINES.

AND FOR CASE 19609 ASKING FOR PERCENT OF THE FINES.

SO IF WE TOTAL IT OUT, THE TOTAL LEAN TO BE PAID WOULD BE $11,000 IN $11,096.18.

THAT'S WHAT THE $750 ADMINISTRATION FEE.

BASICALLY ASKING FOR ANOTHER.

$500. THEY SHOULD DO YOUR ADMINISTRATIVE.

UH, ACTUALLY, IT'S A BIT MORE LIKE IT'S A LITTLE BIT OVER 10,000 BECAUSE IT'S 13% FOR THE FIRST CASE, WHICH IS THE TOTAL FOR BOTH WAS 11,096. YEAH.

11 96.18.

THAT INCLUDES THE 750.

YEAH. IT INCLUDES THE ADMINISTRATIVE CAUSE.

CORRECT. $100 OFF OF THAT.

THAT'S JUST. UH, YEAH.

YEAH. ONE, SHE ONLY DID ONE $750.

THAT'S PROBABLY WHY. YEAH.

I ONLY HAVE NOTED AS ONE $750 ADMIN FEE FOR BOTH OF THE CASES.

PROPERTIES IN VIOLATION.

SO THE PROPERTY WAS IN VIOLATION FROM.

AND. JANUARY 19, 2019.

AND. SCIENCE.

AND. 122.

THEIR CASE. THEY BOTH CAME INTO COMPLIANCE MARCH 1ST OF 22.

THE OTHER CASE WAS IN VIOLATION.

WRITING IN 2020, SAYS JULY 2020.

SERVES.

WHAT THE VIOLATIONS ARE, SIR.

2019 CASE HAD TO DO WITH.

COMMERCIAL VEHICLE AND RESIDENTIAL AREA RV PARK.

BY BUILDING LINE.

TRASH AND DEBRIS. WHAT'S CONSIDERED A COMMERCIAL VEHICLE.

I CAN'T GO BACK AND CHANGE.

[00:10:03]

I MEAN, I'VE ALREADY FOUND OUT.

PROBLEM IS EVERYTHING THAT I CAN SEE IS YOUR MOTHER GOT NOTICE? NOT THE ONLY ONE THAT DOESN'T.

PROBLEM IS YOU DON'T GO, YOU CAN'T QUESTION.

YOU'RE ASKING QUESTIONS. 2020 VIOLATION.

ACCUMULATION OF TRASH.

PICTURE OF WHAT THE VIOLATION WAS.

SURE. THERE.

ANY IDEA HOW LONG THOSE.

I MEAN, IN AND OUT ALL THE TIME.

THIS REALLY WAS WAITING ON GET THAT PROPERTY CLEANED SO I COULD PUT STUFF BACK THERE.

WHAT, LESS THAN $11,000? RIGHT NOW THAT. THE GENERAL RULE ASKED FOR 750.

AND.

UH.

GOING TO DO IS I'M GOING TO ENTER AN ORDER REDUCING THE FINE TO BE $750 PER CASE.

SO IT'LL BE 500 TOTAL FOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE COST.

[00:15:02]

AND. GOING TO REDUCE.

I'M GOING TO GRANT PART OF WHAT THE CITY IS ASKING FOR.

I'M GOING TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO ALLOCATE IT, BUT THE TOTAL WILL BE 5000.

SO THE TOTAL WILL BE $6,500.

6500. WHAT PERCENTAGE OF.

LIKE 1% OR.

I WAS WATCHING VIDEOS ONLINE AND THEY.

SOME PEOPLE GET DOWN LIKE 1% OF THE ACTUAL.

I GUESS THAT'S PART OF IT, HAS IT? I DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU'RE WATCHING, BUT.

OR THIS HAS TO DO WITH THE NATURE OF THE VIOLATION, HOW LONG IT'S BEEN THERE, THOSE KINDS OF THINGS.

SO, YOU KNOW, THAT'S PART OF WHAT GOES INTO THE ANALYSIS OF HOW HARD TO DROP IT.

I CAN'T.

NO, I UNDERSTAND YOUR POSITION, BUT CITY'S POSITION IS, IS THEY HAVE TO GO OUT THERE AND.

THAT'S A THING THAT'S GOING ON IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND IT'S NOT GETTING TAKEN CARE OF.

SO. WHEN THEY ASK FOR REDUCTION, WHEN THEY GIVE PERCENTAGES, I DON'T NECESSARILY GIVE THEM EVERYTHING THAT THEY'RE ASKING FOR, WHICH I'M NOT DOING IN THIS CASE EITHER.

UM. BUT.

NO. WE GET IT? LIKE 5000. I'LL PAY IT TODAY.

THIS VERSION. I HAVE NO OBJECTION TO THAT.

THE CITY HAS NO OBJECTION TO THAT.

$5,000 IF YOU PAY IT TODAY.

AND IT'LL GO UP TO THE ONE I JUST SAID.

WHAT WAS THAT? IT'S NOT.

IT'LL GO UP TO THE 6500.

GO. EVERY DAY.

WE HAVE TO WAIT TILL AFTER THE MEETING IS OVER BECAUSE YOU HAVE TO PAY.

OKAY. DEBIT CARD TRANSACTIONS ARE BIG.

IT'S A BUSINESS DEBIT CARD, SO IT SHOULD.

WE HAVE TO STAY HERE TILL THIS IS OVER.

IN ORDER THAT'LL BE ENTERED, IT'LL SHOW UP IN THE TITLE WORK.

BUY IT FROM YOUR MOM. THAT WAY IT'LL SHOW UP THAT THE FINES BEEN REDUCED AND THEN THE CITY WILL.

IF SOMEBODY FROM THE CITY WILL EXECUTE A SATISFACTION.

RECENTLY. HOW LONG WAS THAT USUALLY TAKE? THEY CALLED ME ON MY WAY HERE AND THEY SAID.

TO GIVE ME PRETTY MUCH GIVE THEM SOMEONE'S PHONE NUMBER TO TALK TO ABOUT.

RIGHT? YEP.

THERE YOU. ALL RIGHT.

OUR NEXT CASE TO BE HEARD IS KB 1662115 AT 1214 SHEL COURT NORTHEAST.

GOOD AFTERNOON, GEORGE.

HOLD ON ONE SECOND. ARE YOU EVERYBODY BACK IN THEIR CHAIRS? OKAY. AFTERNOON.

MY NAME IS GEORGE BURRUS. I'M COUNSEL FOR GOD POLICING LLC.

YOUR HONOR, JUST SOME BACKGROUND REAL QUICK.

GOD PLEASING IS A SMALL IT'S A ONE PERSON LLC.

VIVIAN USAF IS THE PARTY AND SHE BASICALLY BUYS TAX DEEDS.

THIS. THIS LIEN IS ACTUALLY PART OF A TAX DEED WAS ORIGINALLY BACK IN 2015 ON MR. WILHELMI, WHO ORIGINALLY OWNED THE PROPERTY, THE PROPERTY THAT WENT TO TAX SALE AND MY CLIENT BOUGHT IT IN FEBRUARY OF THIS YEAR AND WE HAD THE QUIET TITLE ON IT AND IT GOT SOLD RIGHT AWAY.

WE HELD MONEY ASIDE IN ORDER TO PAY THE.

THE VARIOUS LIENS THAT WERE ON THE PROPERTY.

[00:20:04]

OUR OWNERS, MR. AND MRS. PHIPPEN, ARE RENOVATING THE PROPERTY CURRENTLY.

MY CLIENT OBVIOUSLY HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE LIEN.

BASICALLY, WE'RE JUST TRYING TO SATISFY IT AT THIS POINT.

I'M. WE WERE ASKING THAT YOU'D CONSIDER REDUCING IT DOWN TO $1,000.

BASED ON THE FACT THAT SHE DIDN'T REALLY HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH IT.

AND THEN ON TOP OF IT, WE BASICALLY IT'S BEEN SOLD TO A PARTY.

HE'S BASICALLY GOING TO BE BRINGING THE PARTY, BRINGING THE PROPERTY BACK UP.

I DON'T BELIEVE THERE'S ANY CONTINUING VIOLATIONS FROM WHAT I COULD TELL.

ANGELICA SNEED, COMPLIANCE OFFICER THE CITY HAS NO OBJECTION IN THE REDUCTION OF THIS LIEN, WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT ADMINISTRATIVE FEES ARE COLLECTED OF $750.

THE CITY IS ASKING FOR 14%, WHICH WOULD BE 14 93.78, PLUS THE 750 ADMIN FEE, WHICH A TOTAL OF $2,243.78.

WELL, GUYS, 35,800.

WELL, THE TAX DEED WAS BOUGHT FOR 35,800.

VALUATION THAT YOU USED UNDER THE STATUTE.

PROPERTY. UM.

RESPONSE TO THE CITY'S POSITION.

NOW I JUST ASK IF WE CAN REDUCE IT TO 2000 EVEN.

YES, I HEARD HIS RESPONSE WAS, AND I HAVE THE THOUSAND EVEN.

WELL CITY HAVE AN ISSUE WITH.

YEAH. THE CITY IS REQUESTING THE 2243 78.

WHAT I'M GOING TO DO. I'M GOING TO SPLIT THE DIFFERENCE BASICALLY BETWEEN THE TWO AND REDUCE IT TO $2,100.

I JUST CAUTION.

CLIENT WHO'S BUYING THESE TAX DEEDS THAT BUYER BEWARE.

WHATEVER'S THERE, SHE'S BUYING.

ASKING THAT. I UNDERSTAND, YOUR HONOR.

I DO THE SAME THING. IT'S JUST THE FIRST TIME I'VE BEEN DEALING WITH.

OF. X.

I PUT AN ORDER IN THERE. I KNOW.

THAT SHOULD BE FINE, YOUR HONOR.

I'LL DIRECT THE TITLE COMPANY.

THEY'RE HOLDING ESCROW, SO I'M THE REASON I'M LETTING YOU KNOW THIS.

A. THANK YOU.

NOW, JUST BEFORE THE ORDER WILL BE FORWARDED TO MY EMAIL ADDRESS, I GUESS.

OKAY. HAVE A GOOD AFTERNOON.

OUR NEXT CASE TO BE HEARD IS CV 2034320 AT 554 DEAN COURT NORTHWEST.

HI, MY NAME IS SONIA WEINER.

I'M HERE FOR THE FIVE, FIVE FOUR COURT, NORTHWEST PALM BAY, FLORIDA.

FIRST, I WAS NOT AWARE OF ANY.

OLD STUFF THAT WAS HAPPENING BECAUSE I WASN'T EVEN AWARE THAT THE HOUSE WAS UNDER MY NAME.

UNFORTUNATELY, I WAS GOING THROUGH A BITTER DIVORCE AND HE SWITCHED A LOT OF STUFF AT THE LAST MINUTE.

AND HE PUT THOSE SHIPPING CONTAINERS THERE AND I WAS NOT AWARE OF IT.

BUT WHEN I DID BECOME AWARE OF IT DURING MY DIVORCE, WHEN THE ATTORNEYS TOLD ME I TRIED TO COME UP HERE AND TAKE CARE OF THE SITUATION AS BEST AS I COULD, I WENT ACROSS THE STREET TO WHERE THE WINN-DIXIE PLAZA WAS, AND THE PEOPLE THERE TOLD ME THAT IF I GOT A SURVEY, IF I PAINTED IT TO MATCH

[00:25:04]

THE HOUSE AND I GOT THE ORIGINAL OWNER OF THE SHIPPING CONTAINERS TO SEND ALL THE DOCUMENTATIONS THAT THEN I CAN GET A PERMIT FOR THEM TO BE THERE.

AND I DID ALL OF THAT, AND I SENT ALL THE INFORMATION THROUGH EMAIL.

AND THEN I GOT AN EMAIL BACK SAYING THAT THEY DIDN'T GET IT.

SO I RESENT IT AGAIN.

WHO'S THEY? THE PEOPLE ACROSS THE STREET AT THE WINN-DIXIE PLAZA, THE PALM BAY BUILDING.

THANK YOU. UM, THAT WAS, THAT WAS IN 2021.

ONCE I SENT THEM ALL THE EMAILS AND STUFF LIKE THAT, I DIDN'T HEAR ANYTHING BACK, SO I FIGURED I WAS OKAY AND I FIGURED I WAS JUST WAITING FOR SOMEBODY TO ANSWER ME BECAUSE WE WERE IN THE MIDDLE OF A PANDEMIC.

BUT OTHER THAN THAT, I, I HONESTLY, I HAD I HAD NO IDEA.

I HAD NO IDEA.

THE HOUSE WASN'T EVEN TECHNICALLY UNDER MY NAME UNTIL THE DIVORCE, JUST SO HE COULD LOOK LIKE WE WERE EQUAL AS FAR AS MONEY WAS CONCERNED, I.

ALSO AT THIS POINT. CITY'S POSITION.

DELEGATE NIKO COMPLIANCE OFFICER SAID HE HAS NO OBJECTION TO REDUCTION OF THIS LIEN WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT ADMINISTRATIVE FEES OF 750 IS COLLECTED PLUS 11%, WHICH WOULD BE A TOTAL OF $5,571.79.

SORT OF ONE MORE THING.

NOT THAT IT REALLY MATTERS, BUT JUST SO YOU GUYS ARE AWARE, I'VE ALREADY DISCUSSED IT WITH THE OTHER LADY AND I KNOW I GOT TO FIX IT, BUT JUST SO YOU GUYS KNOW.

ALL THE INFORMATION WAS GOING TO MY EX-HUSBAND'S ADDRESS AND HE KNEW AND NEVER SAID ANYTHING OR DID ANYTHING BECAUSE WE WERE IN THE MIDDLE OF THE DIVORCE. SO THAT'S YET ANOTHER REASON WHY I NEVER GOT ANY INFORMATION ON WHAT WAS HAPPENING.

YEAH. LIKE, YEAH, I LIKE.

BUT SHE TOLD ME EXACTLY WHAT I HAD TO DO NOW.

BUT I'M LEARNING ALL THIS PROCESS NOW.

EX HUSBAND. THAT WAS THE SHOP THAT HE WORKED AT.

AND EVERYTHING WOULD GO THEIR.

UH. I FOUND OUT ALL THE SECRETS STARTED COMING OUT A WEEK BEFORE HE WAS BORN.

I DIDN'T GO FOR THE DIVORCE TO AN ATTORNEY UNTIL 2014.

SHE TOLD ME TO HOLD ON AND.

THEN WHEN WE FOUND OUT WHAT HE WAS DOING BECAUSE HE WAS PRETENDING TO LIKE HE WAS GOING TO WORK IT OUT, HE WAS ACTUALLY JUST TRYING TO HIDE STUFF.

SO THEN WE STARTED WITH THE PROCEDURES AND.

EVERYTHING WAS COMING OUT.

ALL I WANT TO KNOW IS WHEN DID THE DIVORCE GET STARTED? 2014. ENDED IN 21.

HEARD THE CITY'S POSITION REGARDING THE REDUCTION OF THE FINE, WHICH YOUR POSITION REGARDING THE NUMBER THEY GAVE.

THE AMOUNT THAT I HAVE ON THIS PAPER RIGHT NOW.

NO, NO, NO, NO. I'M ASKING YOU.

THE CITY. CITY JUST TESTIFIED.

OH, WHAT? SHE SAID. YES, I'M FINE.

THAT'S FINE. SO 5571 79.

[00:30:05]

YES, YES, YES.

A LOT BETTER THAN WHAT IT WAS.

THAT WITH OR WITHOUT THE SEVEN.

THAT'S WHAT THE 750 INCLUDED.

SO AS I INDICATED TO THE LAST GENTLEMAN, I PAID, WITHIN 30 DAYS, IT GETS REINSTATED.

DON'T HAVE ANY PROBLEM PAYING IT. I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM IN ORDER TO THAT EFFECT.

THANK YOU SO MUCH.

OKAY. THE NEXT CASE TO BE HEARD IS CB 22024-21 AT 1367 NIAGARA STREET NORTHWEST.

AND THIS IS A PHONE CONFERENCE AND A FOLLOW UP FROM LAST MONTH.

WHY? GROUND.

MR. BROWN, CAN YOU HEAR ME? MY NAME IS JAMES BEEDLE.

I'M THE PERSON THAT WAS APPOINTED BY THE CITY OF PALM BEACH TO CONSIDER APPLICATIONS FOR REDUCTION IN CODE ENFORCEMENT LIENS.

AND THE GENERAL PROCEDURE IS, IS THAT YOU, AS THE APPLICANT, WOULD TESTIFY REGARDING THE PREDICATE FOR THE REDUCTION AND THEN THE CITY WILL RESPOND.

AND THEN YOU HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO THE CITY'S TESTIMONY OR EVIDENCE.

YOU UNDERSTAND THAT? OKAY.

AND YOU CAN PROCEED.

OR WERE YOU INVOLVED WITH THE REPAIRS OR ARE YOU RELYING ON SOMEBODY ELSE TO TELL YOU ABOUT THE REPAIRS?

[00:36:10]

OKAY. I'LL GO.

JUST TO LET YOU KNOW, THIS IS LIKE QUASI JUDICIAL PROCEEDING, SO I'M.

NORMALLY THE PEOPLE THAT ARE ACTUALLY DOING THE WORK AND THINGS LIKE THAT ARE NORMALLY TESTIFYING.

SO, I MEAN, YOUR RECITATION OF WHAT YOU UNDERSTAND TO BE THE FACTS ISN'T REALLY EVIDENCE.

SO I JUST WANT TO LET YOU KNOW THAT I BELIEVE THE CITY IS GOING TO TESTIFY THAT THE PROPERTY'S IN COMPLIANCE, OTHERWISE IT WOULDN'T BE IN FRONT OF ME TODAY.

SO I'LL LET THE CITY TESTIFY AND HEAR WHAT THEY HAVE TO SAY AND WE'LL COME BACK TO YOU.

ANGELICA SNEED, CODE COMPLIANCE OFFICER, CITY OF PALM BAY, THE CITY.

THE PROPERTY IS IN COMPLIANCE AND THE CITY HAS NO OBJECTION IN THE REDUCTION OF THIS LIEN, WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT ADMINISTRATIVE FEES ARE COLLECTED OF $750.

THE CITY IS ALSO ASKING FOR 13%.

SO OF THE FINES.

SO THE TOTAL COLLECTED WOULD BE $2,383.35.

IF ANYTHING FURTHER.

NO. MR. BROWN, DID YOU HEAR THE CITY'S TESTIMONY? BUT YOU HAVE THE APPLICANT HAVE ANY OBJECTION TO THAT NUMBER.

OKAY. THEN I'LL ENTER AN ORDER REDUCING THE LEAN TO LEAN THEM OUT TO 2383, 35.

NORMALLY THE LEAN AMOUNT HAS TO BE PAID WITHIN 30 DAYS.

AND IF IT'S NOT, THEN THE ORIGINAL FINE IS REINSTATED AS IS THE APPLICANT.

HAVE AN ISSUE WITH THAT.

OKAY, THEN I'LL ENTER AN ORDER OF THAT EFFECT AND YOU'LL RECEIVE A COPY FROM THE CITY.

GOOD DAY.

BREAK IT.

OUR LAST CASE TO BE HEARD TODAY IS KB 1803917 AT 1399 ROAD SOUTHWEST.

AND THIS IS ALSO A PHONE CONFERENCE.

PEOPLE. BUT.

[00:40:25]

MR. WASHINGTON, MY NAME IS JAMES BEADLE.

I'M THE ATTORNEY OR I AM AN ATTORNEY, BUT I'M THE PERSON WHO WAS APPOINTED BY THE CITY OF PALM BAY TO CONSIDER REDUCTIONS IN CODE ENFORCEMENT LIENS. AND THE GENERAL PROCEDURE BEFORE THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE IS, IS THAT YOU AS THE APPLICANT PRESENT EVIDENCE.

TO SUPPORT YOUR REQUEST, AND THEN THE CITY WILL HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND.

AND THEN AT THAT POINT.

THE YOU WILL HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO THE CITY'S TESTIMONY.

DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT? OKAY, YOU CAN PROCEED THEN.

YES, SIR. PROCEED.

AND PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME TO FOR THE RECORD.

LET ME LET ME HEAR WHAT THE CITY HAS TO SAY FIRST.

AND AND I'LL TAKE THAT UNDER ADVISEMENT AT THIS POINT.

OKAY. DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING ELSE YOU WANT TO PRESENT AT THIS TIME? OKAY. AND WHAT'S THE CITY'S POSITION? ANGELICA SNEED, CODE COMPLIANCE OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF PALM BAY.

THE CITY HAS NO OBJECTION IN THE REDUCTION OF THIS LIEN, WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT ADMINISTRATIVE FEES ARE COLLECTIVE, WHICH IS $750.

THE CITY IS ALSO ASKING FOR 4% OF THE TOTAL LIEN TO BE PAID, SO THAT WOULD BRING IT TO A TOTAL OF $8,664.27. NOTHING FURTHER.

OKAY. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT.

DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING IN RESPONSE, MR. WALSH. I MEAN. MR. JOHNSON.

TO THAT TESTIMONY.

[00:45:01]

THAT'S WHAT THE CITY'S RECOMMENDATION IS.

I HAVEN'T RULED YET, BUT THAT'S WHAT THE CITY'S RECOMMENDATION IS.

RIGHT NOW. I, I UNDERSTAND ALL THAT.

I DON'T KNOW THAT I NEED TO HEAR FROM HER FOR THAT PART OF IT.

I MEAN, YOU'VE YOU'VE TESTIFIED TO THAT.

I DON'T I DON'T NEED TO HEAR MORE THAN ONE PERSON TELL ME THAT.

SO. ALL RIGHT.

WELL, BASED ON THE PROPERTY APPRAISER'S VALUATION OF 19,000.

I DON'T I'M NOT GOING TO IMPOSE.

I'M NOT GOING TO REDUCE I'M GOING TO REDUCE IT TO MORE THAN WHAT THE CITIES.

INDICATED THEY'RE WILLING TO TAKE A.

OKAY, I'M GOING TO ENTER AN ORDER REDUCING THE FINE TO $4,750, WHICH IS BASICALLY.

20% OF THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY.

NORMALLY REQUIRE PAYMENT WITHIN 30 DAYS.

IF IT'S NOT PAID WITHIN 30 DAYS, THEN THE FORMER FINE IS REINSTATED.

IS THAT AN ISSUE FOR YOU? OKAY. THERE'LL BE AN ORDER ENTERED.

TO THAT EFFECT. SO I DON'T KNOW WHEN THE CITY WILL GET IT TO YOU, BUT YOU'LL HAVE IT.

BUT.

CORRECT. YOU NEED TO TALK TO THE CITY'S CODE ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT.

I DON'T. ALL I DO IS CONSIDER THE APPLICATIONS.

I'M NOT INVOLVED IN HOW ALL THAT WORK GETS WORKED OUT.

YES, SIR. HAVE A GOOD DAY.

I'VE SIGNED THE MINUTES FROM THE LAST MEETING BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS.

[ADOPTION OF MINUTES]

THE MEETING IS ADJOURNED AT 1:48 P.M..

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.