[00:00:01]
I'D LIKE TO CALL TO ORDER THIS REGULAR MEETING OF THE CODE ENFORCEMENT MAGISTRATE
[CALL TO ORDER:]
HEARING MAY 15 2019. IT'S APPROXIMATELY 1:15 P.M. AND I'LL HAND IT OVER TO THE CLERK TO SWEAR IN.[SWEARING IN:]
WOULD YOU PLEASE STAND AND RAISE YOUR RIGHT HANDS IF YOU'RE GOING TO BE TO BE SWORN IN. DO YOU SWEAR TO TELL THE TRUTH THE WHOLE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH SO HELP YOU GOD? THANK YOU. FIRST CASE ON THE AGENDA CEB 1 9 4 3 2 -1 8 AGM BLANCO[PETITION FOR RELIEF:]
PETITIONER, 1832 NANTON STREET NW. HELLO. HI. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. MY NAME IS [INAUDIBLE] BLANCO. YOUR PROPERTY ADDRESS IS 1832 NANTON STREET NW PALM BAY FLORIDA? THE PROCESS NORMALLY IS IS THAT YOU PRESENT THE BASIS FOR YOUR REQUEST FOR THE PETITION FOR A REDUCTION IN THE FINE AND THEN THE CITY WILL PROVIDE THEIR RESPONSE AND THEN YOU CAN RESPOND TO THEM SO YOU CAN GO AHEAD AND PROCEED. OK. THIS IS MY SON'S VACANT LAND. HE GOT CITED FOR A LITTLE BIT OVER $2,000 FOR I BELIEVE IT'S FOR CLEANING THE PROPERTY. THERE IS A NEIGHBOR ON ONE OF THE SIDES OF THE PROPERTY THAT I GUESS SHE REQUESTED IT. SHE WANTED IT 20 OR 25 FEET INTO THE PROPERTY BECAUSE IT WAS OBSTRUCTING HER YARD OR SOMETHING. UNFORTUNATELY THE FIRST NOTICE THAT WAS SENT THROUGH CITY OF PALM BAY,HE NEVER RECEIVED IT BY MAIL. WHAT HE RECEIVED WAS A NOTIFIED LETTER AND WHEN HE CALLED CITY OF PALM BAY AND I BELIEVE HE CAME IN TOO, THEY TOLD HIM THAT THERE WAS ALREADY FINES BEING PUT OF $50 I THINK A DAY PLUS THEY HAD ALREADY SCHEDULED SOMEBODY TO GO OUT THERE AND CLEAN THE PROPERTY. THEY SAID THEY COULDN'T STOP THE CLEANING, THAT THEY HAD TO WAIT TILL THE PROCESS WENT THROUGH AND THEN HE CAN COME BACK AND SEE HOW MUCH HE OWED. SO I GUESS AT THIS TIME ALL I'M SEEING IS IF THERE IS ANY WAY THEY CAN REDUCE THIS FINE BECAUSE HE NEVER RECEIVED THE FIRST LETTER. IT NEVER CAME TO OUR HOUSE. WHERE DOES HE RESIDE? 1261 CONNECT ROAD. AND WHAT'S THE CITY'S RESPONSE? THIS PROPERTY WAS POSTED. PROPERTY'S BEEN INSPECTED. THERE ARE CURRENTLY NO VIOLATIONS AND THE CITY IS SEEKING THE FINES ACCRUED. WHERE WERE THE NOTICES FORWARDED? THEY WEREN'T FORWARDED. THEY WERE SENT TO THE ADDRESS OF 1261 CONNECT ROAD NE PALM BAY 3 2 9 0 5 AND THEY WERE RETURNED AND SO THE PROPERTY WAS POSTED. THERE WAS A CERTIFIED MAIL THAT WAS NOT PICKED UP. IS THAT? CORRECT. AND WHEN WAS THE WORK PERFORMED ON THE PROPERTY? JANUARY 29TH 2019 BY SANTA CRUZ CONSTRUCTION. DO YOU HAVE ANY RESPONSE TO THE CITY'S POSITION OR THE INFORMATION THAT THEY JUST PROVIDED? I GUESS WHAT SHE'S PROVIDING IS ACCURATE BECAUSE I DON'T KNOW WHEN THEY CLEANED IT. MY QUESTION IS: ARE NEIGHBORS ALLOWED TO REQUEST ALL THIS VACANT LAND NEEDS TO BE CLEANED SO MANY FEET IN LENGTH? I THOUGHT IT WAS LIKE A STANDARD OF MAYBE 2 FEET 3 FEET BUT 20 FEET IN? ACTUALLY I'LL JUST READ YOU THE TITLE. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU GOT A COPY OF THE ORDER THAT WAS ENTERED BY THE CODE ENFORCEMENT ORDER. HE JUST GAVE ME THIS. I REALLY HAVEN'T HAD A CHANCE TO. I'M JUST GONNA TELL YOU. OKAY. I'M JUST GONNA READ YOU THE CODE. IT SAYS IT REQUIRES THAT OWNERS OF UNIMPROVED[00:05:03]
PROPERTY SHALL NOT PERMIT WEEDS GRASS OR OTHER VEGETATIVE MATTER TO EXCEED 24 INCHES IN HEIGHT WITHIN 25 FEET OF LOT LINES THAT ARE WITHIN 30 FEET OF A RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL STRUCTURE. ACTUALLY 25 FEET IS WHAT IT IS.OKAY. AND YOU CAN CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG BUT AT THE MOMENT THE CITY RESPONDS TO COMPLAINTS FOR THAT. THEY DON'T JUST GENERALLY GO OUT AND ENFORCE IT. SO BASICALLY THIS IS NOT AN UNCOMMON THING THAT COMES BEFORE THIS HEARING. BUT IT'S BASICALLY THE INITIAL VIOLATIONS ARE THE RESULT OF SOME NEIGHBOR COMPLAINING ABOUT THE VEGETATION. YEAH. HE HAD JUST BOUGHT THAT PROPERTY THROUGH A TAX DEED. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU CAN SEARCH IT. IT HASN'T EVEN BEEN A YEAR SO IT'S LIKE YOU JUST BOUGHT IT WITH HIS SAVINGS FROM HIS LAST YEAR'S OF WORK AND ALL OF A SUDDEN HE'S PAYING ALMOST ONE THIRD OF WHAT HE PAID FOR HIS LAND. BUT THE ISSUE IS IS WHAT THE CITY IS SAYING IS THAT THEY SENT OUT THE NOTICE BY CERTIFIED MAIL WHICH IS WHAT THE STATUTE PROVIDES FOR THEM TO DO AND IT APPEARS THAT YOUR SON DID NOT GO PICK UP HIS CERTIFIED MAIL. BUT THE SECOND ONE WAS WHAT WE GOT WHEN WE CALLED, WHEN HE CALLED. NO I UNDERSTAND BUT. BUT WHEN CERTIFIED MAIL GOES OUT JUST SO YOU KNOW THIS, THAT POST OFFICE TRIES THREE TIMES BEFORE THEY SEND IT BACK IN THIS CASE TO THE CITY. SO I'M JUST SAYING IF THEY SENT THE CERTIFIED MAIL OUT THE REASON YOUR SON DID NOT GET THE NOTICE WAS BECAUSE HE DIDN'T GO PICK IT UP AND THE POST OFFICE DOESN'T DO IT ONE TIME. THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO DO IT THREE TIMES BEFORE THEY SEND IT BACK TO THE SENDER. SO I'M JUST LETTING YOU KNOW THE PROCESS. THAT'S ALL.
RIGHT. NO. OKAY. THE INFORMATION THAT'S BEEN PROVIDED IN THE PACKET REFLECTS THAT IT'S $290.21 FOR THE CLEARING. IS THAT CORRECT? ON ONE YOU HAVE 291.06 AND ON THE OTHER YOU HAVE $290.21. SHE HAS THE OKAY. BASED UPON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED AND THE NATURE OF THE VIOLATION, THE LENGTH OF TIME, THE FACT THAT THIS IS A VACANT LOT, THE FACT THAT THE CITY CURED IT AND THE EXPENSE OF THE $290.21 THAT'S IN THE ONE SHEET THAT I HAVE, I'M GOING TO REDUCE THE TOTAL
[00:10:12]
FINE TO $750. THAT INCLUDES HARD COSTS OF THE CITY TO DO THE CLEARING AND THEN THE FINE REDUCTION TO JUST OVER $350 DOLLARS. OKAY. WHO DO I ADDRESS THIS PAYMENT TO? YOU NEED TO CALL THE CODE COMPLIANCE OFFICE. THEY'LL GIVE YOU ALL THE INFORMATION YOU NEED. AND THAT'S THE BEST YOU CAN DO FOR US? YES MA'AM. I MEAN THE CITY GENERALLY HAS TESTIFIED IN THE PAST THAT FOR THEM JUST TO PROCESS A CLAIM IS $500 JUST TO GO THROUGH THE WHOLE PROCESS SO. I GAVE YOU A LITTLE BIT OF BREAK ON THAT. SO I HAVE A QUESTION. IF HE WERE TO PUT UP A CHAIN LINK FENCE ON HIS PROPERTY DOES THIS LAW STILL APPLY? BUT GENERALLY ON A VACANT LOT THEY'RE NOT GOING TO ALLOW YOU TO PUT A FENCE UP. BUT THE ORDINANCE STILL SAYS THAT IF THE PERSON LIVING NEXT DOOR WANTS THAT ORDINANCE TO HAVE THE 25 FEET CUT BACK THEN YES YOU STILL HAVE TO CUT IT BACK. AND THE HEIGHT? HOW HIGH? 24 INCHES. 24 INCHES. SO LIKE EVERY FEW MONTHS. YOU MIGHT HAVE TO DO LIKE A MAINTENANCE CUT ON IT. OKAY. SORRY. NORMALLY THE ORDER PROVIDES FOR PAYMENT WITHIN 30 DAYS. IS THAT GOING TO BE A PROBLEM? NO. THE ISSUE IS IF YOU DON'T PAY WITHIN THAT TIME THE OLD FINE REVERTS BACK. SO I CALL CODE ENFORCEMENT AND I CAN JUST TAKE CARE OF THE PAYMENT? YES, MA'AM. OK. THANK YOU. DID YOU HAVE A QUESTION? NO. I CAN GO? YES MA'AM. THANK YOU. UNLESS YOU WANT TO STAY. NEXT CASE ON THE AGENDA WE'RE GOING TO DO A CONFERENCE CALL. YES.YEAH. HE'S NOT HERE. WHY DON'T YOU CALL THAT CASE SINCE HE'S NOT HERE. DO THE OTHER CASE. NEXT CASE ANGELICA MARTINEZ CODE OFFICER CEB 1 1 8 8 5-0 6 1634 SAIPAN STREET SE KIMBERLEY R MINOT PETITIONER. MS. MINOT, DO YOU SWEAR TO TELL THE TRUTH THE WHOLE TRUTH NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH SO HELP YOU GOD? [INAUDIBLE] THANK YOU. MS. MINOT, CAN YOU HEAR ME? [INAUDIBLE] OKAY. BASICALLY THE WAY THIS PROCESS WORKS IS THAT YOU AS THE APPLICANT PRESENT YOUR CASE FOR THE FINE REDUCTION THEN THE CITY HAS THE OPPORTUNITY TO PROVIDE THEIR RESPONSE AND THEN YOU CAN PROVIDE ARGUMENT OR RESPONSE AFTER THAT. DO YOU UNDERSTAND? [INAUDIBLE] OKAY. YOU CAN PROCEED THEN. WE RENT IT FOR $570 A MONTH. WE'VE NEVER RAISED THE RENT ON THEM. AND WHEN IT BECAME THAT IT WAS IN FORECLOSURE, OBVIOUSLY I KNEW ABOUT IT AND I WORKED WITH AN ATTORNEY TO ACTUALLY PURCHASE THE MORTGAGE ON THE HOME. SO THAT'S HOW I CAME INTO OWNING THE HOME. I HONESTLY THOUGHT THAT THIS. I WAS NEW TO THIS WHEN THIS ONE CAME IN. IT WAS ONE OF MY FIRST AND I SPOKE TO THE FORMER OWNER. AND I APOLOGIZE. I CAN'T THINK OF HIS NAME RIGHT OFF THE BAT. CHRISTOPHER MARR. AND I THOUGHT
[00:15:06]
THAT THIS HAD ALREADY BEEN. I KNOW THAT THE SITUATION WAS NOT ON THE PROPERTY OBVIOUSLY BECAUSE SOMEONE ELSE WAS LIVING IN THERE. SO I THOUGHT THIS WAS RESOLVED AT THAT POINT. I'VE NEVER HAD ONE THAT I ACTUALLY SAW WHERE IT WENT TO BECOME A LIEN ON A PROPERTY. PERSONALLY I THOUGHT IT WAS DONE. SO I'M JUST HERE TO TAKE CARE OF WHATEVER I NEED TO TAKE CARE OF. ANYTHING FURTHER AT THIS POINT? I APOLOGIZE. I DIDN'T UNDERSTAND THAT. DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING FURTHER AT THIS POINT? NO SIR I'M JUST HOPING FOR THE BEST OUTCOME THAT I CAN. AND WHAT'S THE CITY'S POSITION REGARDING THIS? I HAVEN'T INSPECTED THIS PROPERTY AND THERE ARE CURRENTLY NO CODE VIOLATIONS AND THE CITY SEEKING FINES ACCRUED. MS. MINOT WHEN DID YOU PURCHASE THE MORTGAGE? I BELIEVE APPROXIMATELY 2 AND A HALF, 3 YEARS AGO. I ACTUALLY PURCHASED THAT MORTGAGE THAT WAS IN FORECLOSURE AND THE FORECLOSURE FINISHED OUT THROUGH MY ATTORNEY. A LITTLE BIT BECAUSE I WAS MANAGING IT FOR SO LONG THROUGH THE MANAGEMENT COMPANY. PRIOR TO THAT I WOULD HAVE TO LOOK AT THE DEED. WAS THIS CODE VIOLATION THAT THIS IS THE SUBJECT MATTER OF WAS THAT A VIOLATION THAT OCCURRED WHILE YOU WERE MANAGING THE PROPERTY? NO THAT WAS WHEN MR. CHRISTOPHER MARR WAS ACTUALLY LIVING THERE. THERE WAS A CODE VIOLATION LAST YEAR ABOUT A CAR BEING PARKED THERE AND I WORKED WITH CODE ENFORCEMENT IMMEDIATELY AND GOT THAT RESOLVED AND FOLLOWED UP TO MAKE SURE THAT IT WAS RESOLVED. MS. MARTINEZ WITH RESPECT TO THIS PROPERTY ARE YOU AWARE OF ANY OTHER VIOLATIONS ON THE PROPERTY OTHER THAN THE ONE THAT'S THE SUBJECT OF THIS ACTION AND THE ONE THAT MS. MINOT JUST MENTIONED? NO. THE CITY HAS NO HARD COST OTHER THAN THE ACCRUED FINES. IS THAT CORRECT? THAT'S CORRECT. THAT'S CORRECT. I'M GOING TO ENTER AN ORDER REDUCING THE FINE. I'M BASICALLY LOOKING AT WHAT THE NATURE OF THE VIOLATION WAS, THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY, THAT THE VIOLATIONS OCCURRED PRIOR TO THIS OWNER TAKING TITLE AND ALSO PRIOR TO HER BEGINNING THE MANAGEMENT OF THE PROPERTY, PRIOR TO HER OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY AND THAT THE NATURE OF THE VIOLATION HERE IS TO BE DEBRIS AND TRASH IN THE YARD. NO OTHER VIOLATIONS HAVE BEEN ON THE PROPERTY.[00:20:01]
I'M GOING TO REDUCE THE FINE TO $600. MS. MINOT NORMALLY I INCLUDE IN THE ORDER THAT THE PAYMENT OF THE REDUCED FINE MUST OCCUR WITHIN 30 DAYS. WILL THAT BE AN ISSUE FOR YOU? NO, NOT AT ALL. THE REASON I'M ASKING IS BECAUSE IF YOU DON'T PAY IT WITHIN THE TIME PROVIDED IN THE ORDER THE CURRENT FINE WILL BE REINSTATED. IT WILL BE PAID BEFORE THE WEEK IS OVER. OKAY. WHERE DO I PAY IT? YOU NEED TO CONTACT CODE ENFORCEMENT. CODE ENFORCEMENT. OKAY. THANK YOU. OH THANK YOU. AND I JUST WANTED TO ADD NOW THAT YOU'VE DONE WHAT YOU WERE GOING TO DO WHAT A JOY MS. JOSEPH IS TO WORK WITH. I WAS VERY NERVOUS ABOUT THIS PROCESS AND SHE HAS JUST WALKED ME THROUGH EVERY STEP OF THE WAY AND IS VERY RESPONSIVE. OKAY. THANK YOU SO MUCH. THANK YOU. HAVE A GOOD DAY. THANK YOU. YOU TOO. BYE BYE. HELLO. NEXT CASE ON THE AGENDA IS A CONFERENCE CALL. SABRINA PERKINS CODE OFFICER CEB 1 9 4 4 0 -1 8, 888 ELMONT STREET NW AURORA GRANE PETITIONER.NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH SO HELP YOU GOD? YES. THANK YOU. MS. GRANE, CAN YOU HEAR ME? YES I CAN HEAR YOU. MY NAME IS JAMES BEADLE. I'M THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FOR PURPOSES OF THIS HEARING. THE GENERAL PROCESS IS FOR YOU TO PRESENT YOUR REQUEST FOR THE REDUCTION IN THE FINE AND THEN THE CITY WILL RESPOND TO YOU AND THEN YOU WILL HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE THE LAST WORD SO TO SPEAK. SO DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT? YES I DO. OKAY. YOU CAN PROCEED THEN. WELL THE REASON I DIDN'T COMPLY WITH IMMEDIATELY WAS BECAUSE WE MOVE OUT FROM FLORIDA TO MISSOURI AND I RECEIVE THE LETTERS FROM THE CITY OF PALM BAY WHEN I RETURN TO FLORIDA IN FEBRUARY FOR VISITING.
THEN I IMMEDIATELY CONTACT MRS. PERKINS TO LET HER KNOW THAT I HAD A COMPANY WHO CONTAINED THE LOT BUT IT WAS TOO LATE AND THEN I RECEIVED ALL OF THE FINE [INAUDIBLE]. HELLO. DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING FURTHER? WELL I DON'T KNOW WHAT TO SAY. I HAVE BEEN ALWAYS ON TIME WITH PAYMENTS AND TAX AND THINGS LIKE THAT.
THAT'S WHY I REQUESTED THAT THE FINE WIL BE AVOIDED. I DON'T KNOW WHAT ELSE TO SAY. OK.
THAT'S FINE. WHAT'S THE CITY'S POSITION? THE PROPERTY HAS BEEN INSPECTED. THERE ARE NO CURRENT VIOLATIONS. THE CITY IS SEEKING THE FINES ACCRUED. I CAN HARDLY HEAR YOU. I'M SORRY. SHE INDICATED THAT THEY'VE RE- INSPECTED THE PROPERTY. THERE IS NO VIOLATIONS AND THAT THEY'RE SEEKING THE FULL AMOUNT OF THE FINE. MS PERKINS HAVE
[00:25:01]
THERE EVER BEEN ANY OTHER CODE VIOLATIONS REGARDING THIS PROPERTY THAT YOU'RE AWARE OF? THERE MAY HAVE BEEN OTHER NUISANCE VEGETATION ISSUES BUT I DON'T HAVE THAT WITH ME. THERE ARE NO OTHER LIENS FOR THAT. THEY'VE EITHER CUT IT OR THERE HAVEN'T BEEN ANY. THEY TOOK CARE OF IT? CORRECT. THEY NEVER GOT TO THE POINT OF AN ORDER FROM THE CODE BOARD? NO. MS GRANE? YES. HAVE YOU EVER HAD ANY NOTICES FROM THE CITY OF PALM BAY REGARDING THE VEGETATION ON THIS LOT PREVIOUSLY? CAN YOU REPEAT THAT FOR ME? I DIDN'T UNDERSTAND IT. HAS THE CITY OF PALM BAY'S CODE ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT EVER CONTACTED YOU BEFORE ABOUT HOW THE VEGETATION WAS BEING MAINTAINED ON THIS LOT? YES. YES THEY HAVE. THEY DID AND I SENT IMMEDIATELY SOMEBODY TO DO THE JOB. HOW MANY TIMES WOULD YOU SAY THAT HAPPENED APPROXIMATELY? HARDLY HEAR YOU. CAN YOU REPEAT? HOW MANY TIMES PREVIOUSLY HAS THE CITY OF PALM BAY CONTACTED YOU REGARDING THE VEGETATION? NONE. FINES, NONE. I DIDN'T ASK ABOUT FINES. I ASKED YOU HOW MANY TIMES HAVE THEY CONTACTED YOU ABOUT OVERGROWN VEGETATION ON THIS LOT? I CAN'T REMEMBER BUT MAYBE EVERY TWO YEARS OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. AND YOU PREVIOUSLY TOOK CARE OF THOSE EVERY TIME IT CAME UP?WHEN I RECEIVED THE LETTERS. WHEN I USED TO LIVE IN MIAMI I RECEIVED THE LETTERS AND I IMMEDIATELY CONTACT A COMPANY TO CLEAN THE LOT. OKAY. I HAVE NEVER HAD BEFORE A COMPLAINT OR ANYTHING OR A FINE WITH THE CITY OF PALM BAY. HOW LONG HAVE YOU OWNED THIS LOT? CAN YOU REPEAT. HOW LONG HAVE YOU OWNED THIS LOT? HOW LONG. FOR 42 YEARS PROBABLY. 45 YEARS. 40 SOMETHING LIKE THAT. OKAY. AND THE CITY INCURRED A COST TO ACTUALLY MOW THE PROPERTY OR CLEAR THE PROPERTY LINE? CORRECT. THE COST WAS 186.25. MS. GRANE I'M GOING TO REDUCE THE FINE BASED ON THE FACT THIS IS A VACANT LOT, THE NATURE OF THE VIOLATION, THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY, YOUR PRIOR MAINTENANCE HISTORY THAT YOU DID TAKE CARE OF IT EVERY TIME IN THE PAST AND IT NEVER GOT TO THE POINT OF GOING TO THE BOARD. HOWEVER THE BOARD DOES INCUR COSTS OR THE CITY DOES INCUR COSTS FOR GOING TO THE BOARD AND IT ACTUALLY INCURRED HARD COST IN CLEARING THE LOT ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE. I'M GOING TO REDUCE THE FINE TO $536.25.OKAY. AND NORMALLY THE ORDER PROVIDES THAT THE FINE HAS TO BE PAID WITHIN 30 DAYS. IS THAT AN ISSUE FOR YOU? AM I GOING TO RECEIVE A NOTIFICATION OF [INAUDIBLE]? YOU'LL RECEIVE A COPY OF THE ORDER BUT I PUT IN THE ORDER THAT IT HAS TO BE PAID WITHIN 30 DAYS. THE REASON WHY IS BECAUSE IF IT'S NOT PAID WITHIN 30 DAYS THE CURRENT FINE WILL BE REINSTATED. OKAY. AND HOW MUCH IS THE AMOUNT? 500 AND? $536.25.
OKAY. THANK YOU SO MUCH. WELL THAT INCLUDES $186.25 THAT THE CITY INCURRED FOR CLEARING THE PROPERTY. OKAY. IS 30 DAYS ENOUGH TIME FOR YOU OR NOT? OKAY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU SO MUCH. MS GRANE? YES.
[00:30:06]
WHAT I'M ASKING IS IS 30 DAYS SUFFICIENT TIME FOR YOU TO MAKE THE PAYMENT OR DO YOU NEED MORE TIME? AND NO I THINK A COUPLE DAYS IS FINE. OKAY. THANK YOU. HAVE A GOOD DAY.THANK YOU. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. BYE BYE. THERE'S ONE MORE CASE A NO SHOW. ANNOUNCE IT ON THE RECORD. CEB 194 5 3-1 9, DARREL DODARD PETITIONER, 993 SLOCUM STREET NW. AND FOR THE RECORD THERE IS NO ONE ELSE IN THE ROOM SO MR. DODARD IS NOT HERE SO WE WILL NOT HEAR HIS CASE. AND THE CEB NUMBER 1 9 3 3 6 -1 8 WHICH IS MR. MOALLEM'S PROPERTY AT 1135 SLOAN STREET NW IS CONTINUED UNTIL THE ALTERNATE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE CAN HEAR THE CASE. AND I SIGNED
[ADOPTION OF MINUTES:]
THE MINUTES FROM THE LAST MEETING AND THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS THE MEETING IS ADJOURNED AT APPROXIMATELY 1:45 P.M..
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.