[00:00:01]
OK FOLKS WE'RE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND GET STARTED. THE JUNE 5TH 2019 MEETING OF THE
[CALL TO ORDER]
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD IS CALLED TO ORDER. EVERYONE PLEASE RISE RAINER WILL LEAD US IN AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. SHANDRA WOULD YOU CALL THE ROLL PLEASE. YES MS. DOMONOUSKY. HERE. MR. FELIX. HERE. MS. JORDAN. HERE. MS. MARAGH. PRESENT. MR. REED. WE HAVE NOT HEARD FROM. MR. WARNER. MR. WEINBERG. HERE. OUR SCHOOL BOARD APPOINTEE HAS NOT BEEN ASSIGNED. AND OUR BOARD ATTORNEY MR. JAMES STOKES IS PRESENT. WE DO HAVE A QUORUM. THANK YOU SHANDRA. THE FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS IS THE[ADOPTION OF MINUTES]
ADOPTION MINUTES FROM OUR MAY 1, 2019 MEETING DO I HAVE A MOTION PLEASE. MOTION TO ADOPT REGULAR MEETING MAY 1ST 2019. WE HAVE MOTION AND A SECOND ANY DISCUSSION. ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. OPPOSED. MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY. FOR[ANNOUNCEMENTS]
THE BENEFIT OF EVERYONE IN ATTENDANCE THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD IS AN ADVISORY BOARD COMPRISED OF SEVEN MEMBERS ALL MEMBERS OF THE BOARD ARE UNPAID VOLUNTEERS APPOINTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. OUR PROCEDURES ARE AS FOLLOWS. THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT STAFF WILL PRESENT THE STAFF REPORT FOR EACH CASE. BOARD MEMBERS WILL THEN BE ASKED IF THEY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF THE APPLICANT OR THEIR REPRESENTATIVE WILL THEN BE ASKED TO COME TO THE PODIUM AND PRESENT ANY INFORMATION GERMANE TO THE CASE AND TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD. THE FLOOR WILL THEN BE CLOSED FOR PUBLIC COMMENT FOR HER. WILL BE OPEN FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS. WE WILL FIRST HEAR FROM THOSE WISHING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE APPLICATION. THEN THOSE IN OPPOSITION TO THE APPLICATION. ALL APPLICANTS AND SPEAKERS FROM THE AUDIENCE MUST SIGN OATH CARDS AT THE PODIUM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND SPEAK DIRECTLY INTO THE MICROPHONE AND STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. AS A COURTESY I ASK THAT IF THERE IS A GROUP OF PEOPLE FROM A NEIGHBORHOOD WHO MAY HAVE SIMILAR COMMENTS YOU INFORMALLY APPOINT A SPOKESMAN TO CLARIFY YOUR VIEWS. AFTER PUBLIC COMMENTS I WILL BRING THE CASE BACK TO THE BOARD AT THIS TIME THE FLOOR WILL BE CLOSED AND NO FURTHER COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC WILL BE HEARD. I WILL THEN CALL FOR A MOTION AND A SECOND AT WHICH TIME THE BOARD MAY HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS OR FURTHER DISCUSSION. I WILL THEN CALL FOR A VOTE. DECISIONS OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD ARE THEN FORWARDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL DISPOSITION. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENDANCE AND FOR YOUR COOPERATION. CHRIS, OUR FIRST[OLD BUSINESS]
CASE PLEASE. OUR FIRST CASE IS C-10-2019. THE REQUEST IS FOR A CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL TO OUR PROPOSED EVENT HALL AS ESTABLISHED BY SECTION 185.088K OF THE PALM BAY CODE OF ORDINANCE. BACKGROUND. PROPERTY WAS PREVIOUSLY USED FOR LANDSCAPE NURSERY BUSINESS THE NURSERY OPERATION CEASED SEVERAL YEARS AGO. THE APPLICANT SUBMITTED A TEXT AMENDMENT CASE T 5 2019 AND WAS APPROVED ALLOWING AN EVENT HALL USE IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT BY CONDITIONAL USE. CODE REQUIREMENTS. TO BE GRANTED CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL A REQUEST IS EVALUATED UPON ITEMS A THROUGH I OF THE GENERAL REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS LISTED IN SECTION 185.057 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES. A REVIEW OF THESE ITEMS IS AS FOLLOWS. ITEM A DEALS WITH ADEQUATE INGRESS AND EGRESS SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE EXISTING GENERAL COMMERCIAL ZONE PARCEL THAT WAS DEVELOPED FOR A LANDSCAPE NURSERY BUSINESS. SUBJECT PROPERTY HAS ACCESS TO A SINGLE DRIVEWAY CONNECTION ON BABCOCK STREET SE 1 NEW DRIVEWAY CONNECTION TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS PROPOSED WHICH MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS FOR ADEQUATE INGRESS AND EGRESS PER SECTION 185.088K7 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES.ITEM B DEALS WITH ADEQUATE OFF STREET PARKING LOADING AREAS. THE TOTAL ASSEMBLY SQUARE FOOTAGE IS SIX THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED FORTY SQUARE FEET AND WILL REQUIRE ONE PARKING SPACE FOR EVERY THREE SEATS THE TOTAL SEAT COUNT PROPOSED BY THE APPLICANT IS TWO HUNDRED SEATS. THEREFORE A MINIMUM OF SIXTY SEVEN PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED WITH AT LEAST THREE PARKING SPACES BEING HANDICAPPED ACCESSIBLE. THE CONCEPTUAL PLAN SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT PROPOSES A TOTAL OF SIXTY FOUR REGULAR PARKING SPACES AND 4 HANDICAPPED PARKING STALLS THUS SURPASSES WHAT IS REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF PALM BAY CODE OF ORDINANCE SECTION 185.140. ITEM C DEALS WITH ADEQUATE AND PROPERLY LOCATED UTILITIES. ALL NECESSARY UTILITIES WATER ELECTRIC AND WASTE WATER ARE AVAILABLE TO THE PROPERTY. THE PROPOSED SEPTIC SYSTEM WILL NEED APPLICABLE PERMITS FROM BREVARD COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH. ITEM D.
ADEQUATE SCREENING OR BUFFERING. THE NEAREST SINGLE FAMILY HOME IS APPROXIMATELY
[00:05:04]
250 FEET AWAY FROM THE SUBJECT PROPERTY THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HAS AN EXISTING VEGETATIVE BUFFER TO THE NORTH AND SOUTH ABUTTING THE RESIDENTIAL ZONE PROPERTIES AS THE OPERATION IS GOING TO BE USED AS AN EVENT HALL STAFF BELIEVES IT DOES NOT WARRANT FURTHER BUFFERING. E DEALS WITH SIGNS THE CONCEPTUAL SITE PLANS SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT IS CURRENTLY NOT PROPOSING ANY NEW SIGNAGE OR ADDITIONAL LIGHTING HOWEVER ANY LIGHTING AND SIGNS SHALL COMPLY WITH CHAPTER 178 AND SECTION 185.143 OF THE PALM BAY CODE OF ORDINANCES. ITEM F DEALS WITH YARD AND OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS. YARD AND OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS OF LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE HAVE BEEN MET PER SECTION 185.054F4. THE MAXIMUM BUILDING COVERAGE OF THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT IS 50 PERCENT. THE CONCEPTUAL SITE PLANS SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT SHOWS A COVERAGE OF 3.17 PERCENT. ITEM G DEALS WITH THE PROPOSED USE WILL NOT CONSTITUTE A NUISANCE OR HAZARD. THE CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR AN EVENT HALL IS NOT ANTICIPATED TO CREATE ANY NUISANCE FROM THE NUMBER OF PERSONS THAT WOULD PATRON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. SIMILAR INTENSIVE USES SUCH AS AGRICULTURAL NURSERIES PARKS AND PLAYGROUNDS AND PUBLIC UTILITY FACILITIES ARE PERMITTED IN THE RR DISTRICT WHICH IS WHICH THE SUBJECT PARCEL IS SURROUNDED BY.THE SUBJECT PROPERTY MUST COMPLY WITH THE SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS LISTED IN SECTION 185.088K OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES. ITEM H. THE USE AND PROPOSED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT WILL BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE EXISTING OR PERMANENT USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES. STAFF ANTICIPATES A POSSIBLE NOISE ISSUE THAT THE REQUEST WOULD CREATE AN IINCOMPATIBILITY WITH ADJACENT PROPERTIES. HOWEVER THIS HAS BEEN MITIGATED BY THE EVENT HALL ADHERING TO THE CITY'S NOISE ORDINANCE AND SUBSTANTIAL SETBACKS THAT ARE REQUIRED PER THE CODE OF ORDINANCES. THE SUBSTANTIAL SETBACKS ALLOW THE SOUND TO DISSIPATE AS IT MOVES AWAY FROM THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. ITEM I. DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATION OF THE PROPOSED USE WILL BE FULL COMPLIANCE WITH ANY ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS AND SAFEGUARDS WHICH CITY COUNCIL MAY PRESCRIBE INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO A REASONABLE TIME LIMIT FOR SPECIAL APPROVAL IS REQUESTED SHALL BEGIN OR COMPLETED OR BOTH THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD AND CITY COUNCIL HAVE THE AUTHORITY AND RIGHT TO IMPOSE ANY ADDITIONAL AND JUSTIFIABLE SAFEGUARDS AND OR CONDITIONS TO ENSURE THE FACILITY OPERATES SAFELY AND HARMONIOUSLY WITH ITS SURROUNDINGS. CITY STAFF HAS A FOLLOWING SUGGESTED CONDITIONS FOR CONSIDERATION. ITEM 1 THE CITY OF PALM BAY UTILITY AGREEMENT SHALL BE EXECUTED BETWEEN THE PROPERTY OWNER AND THE CITY.
ITEM 2 ALL APPLICABLE OUTSIDE AGENCY PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED. ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, MELVIN TILLMAN WATER CONTROL DISTRICT, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BREVARD COUNTY, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES ETC.. ITEM 3 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMITS THE ENGINEERED SITE PLANS MUST BE GRANTED ADMINISTRATOR APPROVAL AND ITEM 4 SHOULD THE STRUCTURE BEING CLOSED ON THE SUBJECT PARCEL WOULD NEED TO MEET THE ARCHITECTURAL PROVISIONS OUTLINED IN SECTION 185.134 OF THE PALM BAY CODE OF ORDINANCES.
STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF CU 10-2019 SUBJECT TO THE COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CITY CODES AND OTHER GOVERNMENTAL REGULATIONS. THANK YOU CHRIS. DOES THE BOARD HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? SEEING NONE WILL THE APPLICANT PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. GOOD EVENING. ROBERT ROB WITH ROBIN TAYLOR ENGINEERING I'M REPRESENTING THE APPLICANT. WE'RE REQUESTING A CONDITIONAL USE FOR AN EVENT HALL ON A GENERAL COMMERCIAL PIECE OF PROPERTY ON BABCOCK STREET. MR. BALTAR HAS GAVE YOU A VERY THOROUGH SUMMATION OF THE PROJECT. DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? DOES THE BOARD HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. NANCY. THE LAST THING THAT IT SAID IS SHOULD THIS STRUCTURE BEING CLOSED ON THIS SUBJECT PROPERTY. IS THIS THE STRUCTURE THAT'S SHOWING ON THE LITTLE MAP THING THE SITE PLAN OR WHATEVER IS THAT OPEN. IS THIS GONNA BE LIKE A AMPHITHEATER TYPE OF THING. THERE'S THERE'S CURRENTLY ONE BUILDING ACTUALLY THERE'S TWO BUILDINGS HERE THERE'S A POLE BARN THAT IS USED FOR MORE OF AGRICULTURAL PURPOSES RIGHT NOW. AND THEN THERE'S AN OLDER ENCLOSED BUILDING SO THE PLAN IS THE POLE BARN. I BELIEVE IT'S THE THE EASTERN MOST PART OF THE POLE BARN WILL BE ENCLOSED FOR, BATHROOM. WE'RE GOING TO PROVIDE BATHROOMS AND THEY'LL PROBABLY BE A WARMING KITCHEN AND THEN THE REST OF THE FACILITY WILL BE OPEN. THEY THEY PROBABLY WILL HAVE SOME KIND OF WIND SCREENING TO PROTECT FROM THE ELEMENTS. SO IF SOMEBODY WANTED TO HAVE A HAVE AN EVENT DURING BAD WEATHER THEY COULD STILL HAVE IT. SO YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT THE PROPERTY BUILDING THAT IS FIVE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED AND SEVENTY EIGHT SQUARE FEET. THAT'S THE POLE BARN RIGHT NOW. YES. IT'S NOT ENCLOSED. AT THIS POINT IT'S NOT ENCLOSED. OK. AND THEN THERE'S A LITTLE BUILDING DOWN TO THE SOUTH OF IT.
[00:10:02]
CORRECT. AND READ WHAT IT SAYS BUT THAT'S ENCLOSED RIGHT. YEAH THAT IS WHAT YOU WERE SAYING ABOUT THE WARMING. THE POLE BARN THE THE EASTERN MOST I THINK IT'S ABOUT 20 FEET OF THE POLE BARN. THEY'RE PLANNING TO ENCLOSE THAT BECAUSE THEY ARE GONNA HAVE TO HAVE PUBLIC RESTROOMS. SO THAT'LL BE ENCLOSED WITH RESTROOMS AND PROBABLY A WARMING KITCHEN. AND THEN THE REMAINING PART OF THE POLE BARN WILL BE OPENED FOR EVENTS AND THEN THEY WILL HAVE SOME KIND OF WIND SCREENING TO BE ABLE TO CLOSE IT IN FOR INCLEMENT WEATHER. THEY INDICATE WHAT KIND OF EVENTS LIKE WEDDINGS IS THIS WHAT. IT'S ANYTHING YOU CAN TAKE IT COULD BE A CORPORATE EVENT. IT COULD BE GRADUATION BIRTHDAY PARTIES WEDDINGS FAMILY REUNIONS. IT WOULD BE VERY SIMILAR TO IF YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE A PARK PAVILION EXCEPT THIS ONE'S GOING TO BE CATERED. YOU CAN BE ALL LEVELS OF. RIGHT. YEAH. ALL RIGHT. JUST LIKE SOME OF THE LIKE MELBOURNE HAS THE LITTLE PLACE ON FRONT STREET BUT THAT'S ALL IN ENCLOSED THAT YOU CAN RENT. YES. FOR TYPES OF EVENTS. OK.STAFF CONDITIONS IT WAS PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMITS. WHAT ARE YOU PLANNING TO BUILD SOMETHING ON THIS SITE OR IS THERE GONNA BE SOMETHING ELSE THAT YOU'RE DOING WITH THAT SITE OTHER THAN THE TWO BUILDINGS THAT ARE ALREADY THERE. WE'RE GONNA BE IMPROVING THE PARKING. PAVING THE PARKING LANDSCAPING BUT THE TWO BUILDINGS ARE PRETTY MUCH THE ONLY STRUCTURES THAT ARE GONNA BE THERE. THEY'RE JUST GOING TO ENCLOSE THE WAND FIX THEM UP. I THINK THERE'S AN EXISTING SIGN THEY'RE JUST GOING TO RISKIN THE SIGN, THEY'RE NOT GOING TO ADD NEW SIGNAGE. SO NO THERE'S NO NO ADDITIONAL STRUCTURES PROPOSED. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD? NO THANK YOU SIR. THANK YOU. IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS APPLICATION? ANY ONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK OPPOSED TO THE APPLICATION? SEEING NONE, I'LL CLOSE UP THE PUBLIC HEARING AND BRING IT BACK TO THE BOARD FOR A MOTION. MOTION PLEASE. MOTION TO APPROVE CASE CU-10-2019. SUBJECT TO STAFF CONDITIONS. WE HAVE A SECOND. SECOND. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION. NONE. ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE.
ALL OPPOSED. MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY. OUR OUR NEXT CASE PLEASE. MR.CHAIRMAN I DID WANT TO POINT OUT BEFORE I STARTED THE NEXT CASE THAT IN RESPONSE TO MR. WARNER'S QUESTION REGARDING THAT ITEM WE TYPICALLY PUT THAT IN STAFF REPORTS NOW BECAUSE WE'VE HAD SEVERAL APPLICANTS THAT BELIEVE THAT IF THEY GET CONDITIONAL NEEDS APPROVAL THAT THEIR CONCEPTUAL PLAN THAT THEY GOT APPROVED BY COUNCIL IS THEIR SITE PLAN AND THEY TRY TO GO RIGHT TO BUILDING PERMIT. SO THAT'S MORE OF A CATCH ALL FOR THE APPLICANT TO KNOW THAT NO THIS IS NOT SITE PLAN APPROVAL. YOU STILL HAVE TO SUBMIT YOUR ENGINEERED PLANS AND HAVE THEM REVIEWED BY ALL THE DIFFERENT DEPARTMENTS AND GET THAT APPROVED BEFORE THE BUILDING PERMITS. THAT'S KIND OF WHY THAT'S IN THERE. IT'S REALLY JUST TO LET THEM KNOW BECAUSE WE'VE HAD SOME FOLKS THEY, HEY, I GOT PLAN APPROVAL AND NO THAT WAS YOUR CONDITIONAL USE. IT'S A CONCEPTUAL PLAN SO THAT'S WHY WE HAVE THOSE IN THERE YOU'LL SEE THAT IN THERE A LITTLE MORE OFTEN NOW. THANK YOU PATRICK. CERTAINLY. SO THE NEXT TWO CASES ON THE AGENDA ARE IN
[NEW BUSINESS]
REFERENCE TO THE SAME PROPERTY. THE FIRST ONE IS THE LAND USE AMENDMENT AND THE SECOND IS A REZONING THE FIRST CASE IS CASE CP-7-2019 BACKGROUND LOCATED IN THE CITY NORTHEAST OF THE CORNER OF DIXIE HIGHWAY NORTHEAST AND GRAND AVENUE NORTHEAST SPECIFICALLY THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS 3401 GRAND AVENUE NE 32905 WHICH INCLUDES LOTS 12, 13 AND 15 THROUGH 17 OF THE GRAND SUBDIVISION OF CAPE MALABAR. PROPERTIES IS LOCATED IN SECTION 30 TOWNSHIP 28 RANGE 38 BREVARD COUNTY FLORIDA.ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE ARE AS FOLLOWS. TO THE NORTH RM 20 MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL VENETIAN BAY CONDOMINIUMS. TO THE EAST PCR PLAN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT THE RIVERVIEW SENIOR RESORT TO THE SOUTH RS 3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AND GRAND AVENUE NE AND TO THE WEST HC HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL A STORMWATER POND IN THE DRIVEWAY FOR VENETIAN BAY. SUBJECT PROPERTY CONTAINS AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTS OF APPROXIMATELY TWO THOUSAND FIFTY SQUARE FEET THAT WAS CONSTRUCTED IN 1960. THE HOME IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTHERN END OF THE PROPERTY AND WHAT WAS ORIGINALLY LOT FIFTEEN VACANT LAND EXIST ON THE REMAINDER OF THE PARCEL. THE APPLICANT PURCHASED THE PROPERTY ON JUNE 11TH 2018. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A SMALL SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT TO CHANGE 0.91 ACRES FROM SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE TO MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE. THE APPLICANT IS STEVEN CIANCIO. ANALYSIS. PER CHAPTER 183 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REGULATIONS SECTION 183.01B THE PURPOSE INTENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
[00:15:05]
IS TO ENCOURAGE THE MOST APPROPRIATE USE OF LAND AND RESOURCES TO PROMOTE THE HEALTH SAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE COMMUNITY. FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT. THE MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY ALLOWS FOR A MAXIMUM RESIDENTIAL DENSITY OF 20 UNITS PER ACRE WITH A RANGE OF ZERO TO TWENTY UNITS PER ACRE. TYPICAL USE IS PERMITTED INCLUDE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES, DUPLEXES, MULTIPLE FAMILY UNITS, CONGRUENT LIVING UNITS, RECREATIONAL USES AND INSTITUTIONAL USES SUCH AS SCHOOLS CHURCHES AND UTILITIES SUBJECT PROPERTY IS BORDERED BY TWO SEVEN STORY CONDOMINIUM BUILDINGS THE VENETIAN BAY TO THE NORTH AND A SEVEN STOREY ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY TO THE EAST. TO THE SOUTH AS A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN GRAND AVENUE. SOUTH OF GRAND AVENUE IS A FOUR STOREY CONDOMINIUM [INAUDIBLE] WITH MULTIPLE BOAT SLIPS. AND TO THE WEST IS A STORM WATER RETENTION POND AND DRIVEWAY THAT SERVES THE VENETIAN BAY CONDOS. THE APPLICANT INTENDS TO CONSTRUCT A SURFACE LEVEL PARKING LOT AND STORMWATER RETENTION POND TO SERVICE EXPANSION OF THE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY LOCATED IMMEDIATELY EAST. COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN THE COASTAL MANAGEMENT AREA AS IT IS LOCATED EAST OF DIXIE HIGHWAY. HOWEVER THE PROPERTY WAS PREVIOUSLY ISSUED BUILDING PERMITS AND IS PRESENTLY DEVELOPED. DEVELOPMENT OF A SURFACE LEVEL PARKING AREA AND RETENTION POND WILL NOT AFFECT THE COASTAL MANAGEMENT AREA. CONSERVATION ELEMENT.THE PARCEL IS NOT LOCATED WITH ANY OF THE FLORIDA SCRUB JAY POLYGONS IDENTIFIED IN THE CITY'S HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN. NO ADDITIONAL LISTED SPECIES ARE KNOWN TO INHABIT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ANY LISTED SPECIES IDENTIFIED ON THE SUBJECT PARCEL WOULD NEED TO BE MITIGATED FOR AS REQUIRED BY STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS AND PER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICY CON-1.7B.R RECREATION. MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE DOES NOT HAVE MORE OF A DEMAND IN THE PARKS AND RECREATION LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS THAN SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE DOES. HOWEVER THE INTENDED USE WILL HAVE NO EFFECT ON THE RECREATION LEVEL OF SERVICE. IT SHALL BE NOTED THAT THE RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT OF THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SETS A LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD OF 2 ACRES PER 1000 RESIDENTS. THE CITY MAINTAINS PUBLIC OWNERSHIP OF PARK DESIGNATED LANDS THAT FAR EXCEEDS THIS REQUIREMENT. HOUSING ELEMENT. THE PROPOSED FLU AMENDMENT DOES NOT ADVERSELY IMPACT THE SUPPLY AND VARIETY OF SAFE DECENT ATTRACTIVE AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING WITHIN THE CITY. THE AMENDMENT WILL ALLOW THE SITE TO BE USED AS ACCESSORY USES FOR THE ADJACENT ALF.
INFRASTRUCTURE AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENTS. THE CITY EVALUATES PRESENT AND FUTURE WATER SEWER DRAINAGE AND SOLID WASTE AND ASSESSES THE ABILITY OF INFRASTRUCTURE TO SUPPORT DEVELOPMENT. UTILITIES. THE FLU CHANGE WILL NOT CAUSE LEVEL SERVICE TO FALL BELOW THE STANDARDS ADOPTED IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THESE SERVICES FOR THE CURRENT PLANNING PERIOD. A 10 INCH WATER DISTRIBUTION LINE AND AN EIGHT INCH SEWER COLLECTION LINE IS LOCATED ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF GRAND AVENUE. THEREFORE POLICY FOU 3.1B WHICH IS ADEQUATE ACCESS TO WATER AND SEWER SERVICES WOULD BE MET IF VERTICAL DEVELOPMENT WERE PROPOSED.
DRAINAGE. THE PROPERTY CONTAINS NO ACTIVE DRAINAGE FACILITIES OTHER THAN SINGLE FAMILY DRAINAGE TO GRAND AVENUE. THE UPCOMING PROPOSES TO CONSTRUCT A STORM WATER RETENTION POND THAT WILL SERVICE THE PROPOSED PARKING AREA. THE DESIGN AND ITS OUTFALL CONNECTION TO THE OVERALL DRAINAGE BASIN WILL BE EVALUATED AT THE TIME OF SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT. PUBLIC SCHOOLS. THE PROPOSED FLU AMENDMENT IS REQUESTING TO ALLOW THE SITE TO BE USED AS ACCESSORY USES. THE PROPERTY USE WILL HAVE NO IMPACT ON THE PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM. AND LASTLY TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT. THE OBJECTIONS OF THE TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ARE TO PROVIDE A SAFE BALANCED EFFICIENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM THAT MAINTAINS ROADWAY LEVEL OF SERVICE AND ADEQUATELY SERVES THE NEEDS OF THE COMMUNITY. THE EXISTING ALF TO THE EAST WAS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL AND CITY STAFF AND THE TRANSPORTATION [INAUDIBLE] WAS VETTED AT THAT TIME. THE PROPOSED PARKING AREA WILL NOT CREATE A FURTHER BURDEN ON THE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK AS IT WILL PROVIDE FOR STAFF AND VISITOR PARKING NEEDS THAT ARE SEPARATED FROM THE FUTURE RESIDENTIAL PARKING GARAGE LOCATED WITHIN ALF. HOWEVER SHOULD THE APPLICANT SUBMIT PLANS TO INCREASE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE A TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS WOULD BE REQUIRED AT THAT TIME. THAT RECOMMENDATION MOTION TO APPROVE KCP 7 2019 PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 163 FLORIDA STATUES. HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THE BOARD MAY HAVE AND THE APPLICANT IS IN ATTENDANCE. THANK YOU PATRICK. DOES THE BOARD HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? HI PATRICK. I JUST HAVE ONE CLARIFICATION. MAKE SURE I'M UNDERSTANDING.
ALL HE'S LOOKING TO DO IS TO BUILD AN ADDITIONAL ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY. NO. FOR THIS REQUEST HE IS LOOKING TO CHANGE THE LAND USE AND ZONING SO THAT HE CAN PROVIDE AN ACCESSORY USED TO THE ALF THAT'S ON THE PARTIAL TO THE EAST.
OKAY SO IT'S NOT BUILDING ANYTHING IN PARTICULAR. HE'S BUILDING A PARKING LOT. THAT'S ONE LEVEL. THERE'S NO GARAGE THERE'S NO BUILDING THAT HE'S PROPOSING TO BE PUT ON THE PARCEL. AND THE REASON FOR THE LAND USE AND ZONING IS BECAUSE AN ALF IS NOT ALLOWED IN SINGLE FAMILY BECAUSE IT'S ACCESSORY TO THAT USE THE LAND USE AND THE ZONING NEEDS TO BE CHANGED SO THAT IT'S ALL ALLOWABLE USES. BUT AT THIS TIME THERE'S
[00:20:03]
NOT PROPOSING ANY VERTICAL DEVELOPMENT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? RAINIER, IS THERE A QUESTION? WELL NO SIR. I'LL WAIT AND HEAR WHAT THE APPLICANT HAS TO SAY. THANK YOU. WILL THE APPLICANT PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. I THANK YOU VERY MUCH. I'M STEVE CIANCIO. I'M THE OWNER. BEEN THE OWNER AND DEVELOPER OF THE PROPERTY SINCE 2005. WE'RE NOT LOOKING TO DO ANYTHING AS FAR AS ANY VERTICAL CONSTRUCTION ON THE PROPERTY WHATSOEVER.WE JUST BASICALLY PURCHASED THE PROPERTY LAST JUNE AND WHEN WE DO BUILD OUR SECOND PHASE WE JUST NEED ADDITIONAL PARKING FOR OUR VISITORS AND OUR STAFF. SO BASICALLY JUST GONNA BE A PARKING LOT. IT'S THAT SIMPLE. THE BOARD HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. CIANCIO. NANCY.
OKAY. SO YOU SAID YOUR SECOND PHASE IS THAT WHERE IT LOOKS LIKE A POND IS LOCATED. NO. THE BUILDING THAT'S BEEN APPROVED ALREADY BY THE CITY IS ON THE EXISTING PROPERTY THE PROPERTY RIGHT NOW WE'RE LOOKING TO GET BE ZONED HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE ORIGINAL PROPERTY. THIS IS JUST A PARKING LOT. NO I MEAN. OKAY I KNOW THE YELLOW IS WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT TODAY BUT JUST TO THE EAST OF IT IS LIKE A OVAL SHAPE. IS THAT A RETENTION POND. SO NANCY RIGHT HERE IS THE EXISTING BUILDING. YEAH. THE HORSESHOE AND THEN YOU SEE THIS SORT OF SCRAPED AREA. YEAH THAT'S WHERE THE PHASE 2 BUILDING WOULD BE CONSTRUCTED. OKAY. IT LOOKS LIKE YOU KNOW IT WAS WATER OR SOMETHING. YEAH. THE AREA. WE'D LIKE YOU TO COME DOWN TO VISIT IT. IS IT [INAUDIBLE]. THE BUILDING IS THERE, IT HAS BEEN THERE SINCE 2014. RIGHT. PROBABLY HAVE HUNDRED RESIDENTS. WE HAVE 108 EMPLOYEES WE GOT 30 VETERANS THAT ARE THERE SERVING THE COMMUNITY, HAVE ALZHEIMER'S RESIDENTS THERE. WE HAVE A LOT OF ALZHEIMER'S PATIENTS THAT HAVE BEEN THERE FOR THREE YEARS. WE HAVE PEOPLE THAT ARE IN THERE THAT HAVE PARKINSON'S DISEASE AND IT'S BEEN A REALLY REALLY GOOD OPPORTUNITY FOR THE CITY OF PALM BAY ESPECIALLY THE BAYFRONT REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO BASICALLY PUT THE CITY ON THE MAP AND IT LOOKS AT ALL WE'RE DOING ON THIS OTHER PROPERTY THAT WE JUST ANNEXED IS BASICALLY JUST MAKE A PARKING LOT FOR BASICALLY OUR EMPLOYEES AND THE VISITORS AND THAT'S REALLY ABOUT IT. AND OUR RESIDENTS THE PEOPLE WE HAVE RIGHT NOW OUT OF THE HUNDRED RESIDENTS THAT WE HAVE WE HAVE MAYBE APPROXIMATELY EIGHT CARS. THEY HAVE ALZHEIMER'S. THEY HAVE A ASSISTED LIVING, THEIR IN WHEELCHAIRS AND NOT REALLY DRIVING CARS.
BUT YOU HAVE TO AS FAR AS THE CODE IS CONCERNED WITH THE CITY YOU HAVE TO HAVE THE CAPACITY FOR THE PARKING SO THAT'S WHY WE JUST WANTED THIS. RIGHT. SO IT'S MAINLY THE VISITORS AND THE EMPLOYEES. YES THAT'S IT. MR. CHAIR. WELL SIR I WENT BY THE SITE AND I TOOK A LOOK AT IT AND I'LL BE HONEST JUST LIKE EVERYBODY ELSE I THOUGHT YOU WERE TRYING TO SQUEEZE 20 PLUS HOUSES INTO THAT LITTLE AREA THERE AND IT WAS JUST LIKE NO WAY WAS THAT GOING TO HAPPEN. IT'S JUST I MEAN IT JUST WASN'T FEASIBLY POSSIBLE BUT NOW THAT YOU'VE EXPLAINED WHAT YOU WHAT THE TRUE INTENTION IS FOR THAT. IT'S MORE UNDERSTANDABLE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU APPRECIATE IT. BOARD HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS. ONE MORE PLEASE. OK. SO THIS PROPERTY ACCORDINGLY LOOKS LIKE AN UPSIDE DOWN J. RIGHT. THAT CENTER PART IN THAT IS PEOPLE THAT ARE I GUESS THERE'S TWO HOUSES RIGHT PATRICK THERE'S TWO HOUSES DOWN THERE. YES. SO IT'S LIKE AN INVERTED J. THAT'S THE PROPERTY YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT PUTTING A RETENTION POND AND PARKING.
NANCY? NO. OK. BOARD HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? THANK YOU MR. CIANCIO. THANK YOU. MR. CHAIRMAN. I DID WANT TO POINT OUT THAT AND FOR THE PUBLIC RECORD THAT WE DID RECEIVE A PETITION FROM THE RESIDENTS OF VENETIAN BAY AND THAT HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO EVERY BOARD MEMBER. WE DIDN'T GET IT IN TIME FOR THE STAFF REPORT THAT'S WHY IT WAS NOT ATTACHED TO THAT REPORT BUT WE DID ELECTRONICALLY PROVIDE THAT TO ALL OF YOU. I JUST WANTED THE PUBLIC TO KNOW THAT THAT WAS RECEIVED AND WAS TRANSFERRED TO YOU. YEAH ABSOLUTELY. I'M IN POSSESSION OF THAT I WAS I WAS GOING TO MENTION THAT. I'M GLAD YOU BROUGHT THAT UP. OK. IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE FIRST OF ALL WHO WISH TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE APPLICATION. LET'S GET THAT OVER WITH. BILL. WE'LL TRY. THE SOUND SYSTEM ISN'T GREAT. I'M SORRY. BILL BATTIN 586 OCEAN SPRAY STREET SW. I HAD A LITTLE BIT OF CONCERN BUT I'VE LOOKED AT THIS PROPERTY MANY MANY TIMES. I'VE ACTUALLY GONE OUT ON THE BOARDWALK WHEN THIS WAS BUILT BECAUSE I HEARD THE THINGS THAT THEY WERE GOING TO BE PROVIDING TO THE CITY. I'VE GONE TO THIS TO THIS ASSISTED LIVING HOME AND I WALKED OUT ON THE BOARDWALK BECAUSE THESE WERE THINGS THAT THEY SAID THEY WERE GOING TO OPEN TO THE PUBLIC WHICH I THOUGHT WAS A VERY GOOD THING FOR A DEVELOPER TO DO TO
[00:25:02]
MAKE THINGS THAT WERE GOING TO MAKE THE BAY AREA OR THE INDIAN RIVER LAGOON AREA A LITTLE MORE ACCESSIBLE AND A LITTLE MORE INVITING. SO I WENT THERE AND I HAD A HARD TIME TRYING TO FIND A PLACE TO PARK BECAUSE I DIDN'T WANT TO PARK IN THE RESIDENTIAL PARKING INSIDE THEIR COVERED GARAGE. SO IT'S JUST A FEW PARKING LOTS OUTSIDE. SO I SAID IT WOULD REALLY BE NICE IF THEY HAD PARKING HERE. THAT'S ONE THING THAT I DID DO AND I BECAUSE IT'S A GORGEOUS PLACE AND YOU GUYS DID A GREAT JOB ON YOUR BUILDING THERE. IT'S FANTASTIC. BUT THERE'S YOU KNOW, BILL BATTIN. HE ALWAYS FINDS A NEGATIVE WITH EVERYTHING AND MY MY CONCERN WAS WHEN I WAS READING ABOUT THE STORMWATER AND RETENTION POND THAT CURRENTLY IT WAS SET THE RUNOFF WAS GOING INTO A RESIDENTIAL TYPE DEVELOPMENT WHICH IS NOT BIG ENOUGH FOR A COMMERCIAL SIZE RUNOFF FOR PARKING LOT IS JUST SWELL IS SMALLER. MY CONCERN WAS IF IT HAS TO BE MODIFIED OFF OF THEIR PROPERTY TO ENCOMPASS THE STORMWATER BECAUSE IT'S RIGHT THERE ON THE LAGOON IS IT GOING TO BE PAID FOR OUT OF OUR STORMWATER FEE OR IS IT GOING TO BE PAID FOR OUT OF THE DEVELOPERS. BECAUSE I KNOW THAT ONCE THERE IS AN OVERFLOW IT HAS TO GO TO THE LAGOON. THAT'S THE WAY IT'S DESIGNED. THAT WAS MY CONCERN. I WANT TO SEE THEM PROCEED AND I WANT TO SEE PHASE 2 BUILT BECAUSE THE COMPANY IS DOING NOTHING BUT GOOD FOR THE CITY. BUT I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT MY STORMWATER MONEY DOESN'T GET SPENT ON PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT. THAT BEING SAID THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU BILL, IS THERE ANYONE ELSE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE APPLICATION? NO ONE ELSE. OK IS THERE ANYONE WHO WANTS TO SPEAK AGAINST THE APPLICATION? MR. CHAIRMAN BEFORE THE GENTLEMAN SPEAKS I DID WANT TO ANSWER. SURE. SORRY. DO YOU WANT ME TO FILL THIS OUT AT SOME TIME? YEAH GO AHEAD. OK. DO I FILL IT OUT AND GIVE IT TO YOU AFTERWARDS? YOU TURN IT INTO THE CHAIRMAN. OK. JUST TURN IT IN, PUT IT RIGHT IN THAT BASKET. JUST FOR BILL AND EVERYONE ELSE'S BENEFIT THERE ARE ZERO TAX DOLLARS GOING TO ANY IMPROVEMENTS ON THIS SITE.IT'S ALL GONNA BE PRIVATELY FUNDED. THE OUTFALL FROM THE PROPOSED DRAINAGE IS GOING TO FLOW INTO THE EXISTING DRAINAGE SYSTEM OF RIVERVIEW ON THE NORTH EDGE OF THE PROPERTY. THANK YOU PATRICK. YEAH. I'M REPRESENTING I'M BARRY HANSON I'M REPRESENTING THE VENETIAN BAY. I WAS ON THE BOARD FOR SINCE DAY ONE. I'M NO LONGER ON IT FOR THE LAST COUPLE OF YEARS BUT AS FAR AS QUERYING THE MEMBERSHIP OF THE VENETIAN BAY, THEY WERE AGAINST IT. AND I'LL TELL YOU WHY. NUMBER SEVEN UP THERE TRANSPORTATION, MAINLY. BUT IF YOU ALSO LOOK AT THE VIDEO FOR THE MARKETING OF RIVERVIEW IT SHOWED PHASE 2 WHICH THAT SECOND BUILDING WITH AN UNDERGROUND GARAGE. IT SHOWED NO OUTSIDE PARKING IN A PARKING LOT. AND RIGHT NOW WE HAVE A REAL PROBLEM WITH GRAND AVENUE. WE'RE EXITING VENETIAN BAY. PEOPLE COME FLYING UP GRAND AVENUE FROM THE DIRECTION OF RIVERVIEW. WE'VE HAD ALMOST MULTIPLE ACCIDENTS ON MY PART. WITH JUST EASING OUT THERE AND SOMEBODY IS COMING ALONG DOING 30, 40 MILES AN HOUR UP GRAND AVENUE. WE'RE GOING TO HAVE NEW IS ABOUT ONE GOOD FOR ONE LANE. IT'S KIND OF YOU KNOW I'D SAY MAYBE IT'S A LANE AND A HALF. BUT IT'S NOT VERY WIDE. AND IT WAS REALLY BUILT BACK WHEN YOU HAD SOME HOUSES DOWN THERE AND AN OLD RESTAURANT AND NOT WHERE YOU'RE GONNA HAVE A LOT OF PEOPLE WHICH I ASSUME ARE GONNA MAYBE BE INDEPENDENT LIVING MORE PEOPLE THAN YOU HAVE AN ASSISTED LIVING. AND THE TRAFFIC THAT'S GOING TO GO UP ON GRAND AVENUE AND WE JUST ARE NOT IN FAVOR OF PUTTING IN ANOTHER PARKING LOT AND INCREASING THE TRAFFIC ON GRAND AVENUE. I'M ALSO CONCERNED ABOUT WHAT CAN HAPPEN TO A MULTIFAMILY WE REALIZE IF YOU WANT TO PUT IN A PARKING LOT HE HAS TO MAKE IT MULTI-FAMILY NOT INDIVIDUAL FAMILY BUT LOST A LITTLE BIT OF MY TRAIN OF THOUGHT.
BUT YOU GO AHEAD WITH A MULTI-FAMILY FIVE YEARS FROM NOW, IT'S GONNA BE CHANGED FROM A PARKING LOT TO ANOTHER BUILDING YOU KNOW TO EXPAND RIVERVIEW. WE DON'T KNOW. SO WE'RE SOMEWHAT CONCERNED ABOUT WHERE WE'RE GOING WITH THE DEVELOPMENT. I WILL SAY RIVERVIEW HAS BEEN AN EXCELLENT NEIGHBOR OF OURS. IN FACT MY BROTHER IN LAW LIVES THERE IN ASSISTED AND ACTUALLY MEMORY CARE AND THEY GIVE ACTUALLY GOOD CARE. IT'S JUST OUR REAL CONCERN THAT WE HAVE TWO FOLD WITH TRANSPORTATION AND WHAT IS THE EVENTUAL COULD HAPPEN TO THE MULTI-FAMILY PARKING AREA COULD IT BE TURNED INTO ANOTHER HIGH RISE EXPANSION OF RIVERVIEW AND EVEN MORE SO AN INCREASE IN THE TRAFFIC. WHAT WE'D LIKE TO SEE IF ANYTHING IS GRAND AVENUE MODIFIED TO SLOW DOWN THE TRAFFIC AND THAT WE CAN GET OUT SAFELY. SPEED BUMPS
[00:30:07]
WHATEVER WE CAN GET OUT SAFELY ON TO GRAND AVENUE WHEN WE'RE GOING UP TO US 1. I'LL ALSO SAY WHEN WE GET OUT ONTO GRAND AVENUE AND GET UP TO US 1 TURN YOU HAVE PEOPLE COMING SOUTH THAT ARE GOING INTO GRAND AVENUE SPEEDING BECAUSE THEY WANT TO BEAT THE TRAFFIC COMING NORTH AND CUT THE CORNER AND I'VE ALMOST BEEN HIT NUMEROUS TIMES THERE AS WELL AS WELL AS TRYING TO JUST GOT OUT OF VENETIAN BAY. SO OUR BIGGEST CONCERN IS THE TRAFFIC LOAD THAT'S GOING TO BE COMING UP AND DOWN GRAND AVENUE AND THAT'S REASON AT THIS POINT OUR MEMBERSHIP IS OPPOSED TO A PARKING LOT. WHETHER OR NOT TO SIT THERE AND MAKE IT A MULTI-FAMILY THAT'S FINE BUT A PARKING LOT AND INCREASED TRAFFIC. YOU KNOW WE WANT IT. WE WANT TO HAVE SOME SORT OF PROGRAM PUT IN PLACE ON GRAND AVENUE TO ENSURE OUR SAFETY AS WELL AS THE SAFETY OF SOMEBODY COME FLYING UP GRAND AVENUE AND HITTING US OR WE HITTING THEM PULLING OUT IN FRONT OF THEM. BECAUSE SOMEWHAT OF A BLIND IT'S SOMEWHAT OF A BLIND INTERSECTION COMING OUT THAT IS OUR MAJOR CONCERN IS THAT WE HAVE WITH ZONING IT AND TURNING IT INTO A PARKING LOT. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK OPPOSE THE APPLICATION. MA'AM, SIR. RIGHT AFTER HER. YOU CAN TAKE IT BACK TO YOUR SEAT AND FILL OK AND LEAVE IT IN THE BASKET BEFORE YOU. THANK YOU.MY NAME IS [INAUDIBLE] HUDSON AND WE LIVE IN VENETIAN BAY AND HAVE LIVED THERE SINCE IT OPENED. MY CONCERN I'M NOT GOING TO TALK ABOUT TRANSPORTATION BUT I THINK IN THE FUTURE WE'RE PROBABLY GOING TO HAVE A STOPLIGHT THERE AND I KNOW THAT'S PROBABLY A MILLION DOLLARS AND YOU CAN'T PROBABLY DO A STOPLIGHT ON A BIG US 1, BUT IT IS SO DANGEROUS. SOMEBODY WAS KILLED THERE YOU KNOW. SO I'M SURE YOU'RE ALL AWARE OF THAT. IT IS. WE HAVE THE APARTMENTS ACROSS THE STREET. WE HAVE THE CONDOS. WE HAVE THE ALF NURSING HOME. BOATERS. THAT'S JUST IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. AND I'M SURE THAT US 1 IS GROWING MORE AND MORE. RIGHT WHERE WE ARE WE REALLY HAVE A LOT OF NATURE THERE AND WE NEED TO RESPECT THAT. WE HAVE SO MANY EAGLES THAT HAVE JUST HAD BABIES IN THE LAST MONTH OR TWO AND THEY ARE LIVING RIGHT THERE AT VENETIAN BAY AND PROBABLY RIGHT AROUND THE NURSING HOME TOO. AND I WOULD REALLY HATE TO LOSE OUR NATURE. I MEAN BALD EAGLES ARE VERY SPECIAL AS YOU KNOW. SO THAT IS NATURE IS MY BIG CONCERN. WE PUT A PARKING LOT THERE COULD WE POSSIBLY PUT THE PARKING LOT ACROSS OVER US 1 LIKE YELLOW DOG IS DONE. MAYBE HE COULD BUY LAND OVER THERE AND THEY COULD YOU KNOW IF YOU HAVE AN ALZHEIMER'S PERSON OR SOMEBODY THAT HAS A CAR AND THEY NEVER USE IT WHY COULDN'T THEY BE OVER THERE AND LET THE EAGLES HAVE THEIR LAND. I MEAN WE'VE GOT BIRDS THERE AND FISH. IT'S FABULOUS BUT IT'S NOT GOING TO BE THERE LONG IF WE CONTINUE TO FILL UP THAT SPACE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU MA'AM.
SIR. MY IS NAME'S DOUG TAYLOR WITH THE RUM COVE CONDOMINIUM COMPLEX I LIVE AT 5011 DIXIE HIGHWAY. I'M NOT OPPOSED TO THE TO THE REVISION IN THE LAND USE AND THE COMPREHENSIVE USE I DO HAVE SOME CONCERNS AND THAT IS ON THE CONSERVATION ELEMENT. WHILE YOU SAID THERE IS NO SCRUB JAYS THERE THE DRAIN WATER FROM THERE FALLS INTO THAT THE MARINA JUST TO THE SOUTH OF COURSE AND THAT MARINA IS FILLED WITH MANATEES. AND OF COURSE MANATEES ARE PROTECTED. THEY'RE PROTECTED UNDER BY FEDERAL GOVERNMENT BY THE MARINE MAMMAL PROTECTION ACT OF 72 AND THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT OF 75. SO I JUST WANT TO MAKE THAT CLARIFICATION THAT THE DRAIN WATER FROM GOES INTO THE MARINA AND I CAN SHOW YOU PICTURES OF MANATEES SIPPING AT THE DRAIN VALVES ALONG THE MARINA. ADDITIONALLY AND THERE'S A LOT OF MANATEES IN THERE BY THE WAY. ADDITIONALLY THE WATER IS CLOUDY. SO I JUST WANT TO MAKE A CONCERN THAT THE RETENTION POND AND SUBSEQUENT BAFFLES WILL BE ENOUGH TO PROTECT THE MANATEES WILL BE ENOUGH TO PROTECT DEBRIS FROM COMING INTO THE MARINA WHERE
[00:35:04]
THERE'S WILDLIFE. THE RIVERVIEW HAS BEEN AN EXCELLENT NEIGHBOR AND A STEWARD OF THE RIVER. AND SO I'M NOT OPPOSED. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE HAVE ENOUGH PROTECTIONS IN PLACE SO THAT WE PROTECT THE MANATEES AND THE NEIGHBORS INCLUDING THE MARINA. THANK YOU. THANK YOU SIR. IF YOU WOULD YOU FILL UP ONE OF THOSE CARDS AND BEFORE YOU LEAVE PUT IT IN THE BASKET. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK? MR. CIANCIO, Y YOU WANT TO RESPOND? I JUST WANT TO MAKE A QUICK COMMENT AS FAR AS THE CONSERVATION JUST WANT EVERYONE HERE TO KNOW THAT THE BREVARD COUNTY'S ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY HAS BEEN OUT AT OUR PROPERTY PROUD TO SAY THAT WE ARE THE FIRST OYSTER RESTORATION REEF THAT JUST GOT BUILT IN INDIAN RIVER RIGHT OUTSIDE OF OUR PROPERTY GOES FROM OUR DOCK ALL THE WAY AROUND THE PROPERTY THEY WERE JUST THERE YESTERDAY REFILLING THE NETS SO TALK ABOUT CONSERVATION AND THAT'S WHAT WE DO. WE'RE ALL ABOUT THAT. AS FAR AS THE PARKING THERE ARE THERE'S FIVE PARKING SPACES THAT WE HAVE A LOTTED FOR THE GENERAL PUBLIC TO BE ABLE TO USE TO ACCESS THE DOCK PARKING DOES GET TIGHT THERE. I'M NOT SAYING IT'S NOT BUT THOSE FIVE SPACES ARE A LOTTED FOR THAT. BUT I'M ALL ABOUT CONSERVATION. WE FISH OUT THERE ALL THE TIME. WE HAVE THE FISHING EXTRAVAGANZA FOR OUR RESIDENTS ON A MINIMUM OF TWO TIMES A MONTH. THEY'RE OUT THERE YOU COULD SEE IN FISHING HAVING BARBECUES SO WE'RE ALL ABOUT CONSERVATION. SO I JUST WANT YOU GUYS TO KNOW THAT IT'S VERY IMPORTANT TO ME TOO. AS FAR AS THE BAFFLE [INAUDIBLE] IS CONCERNED ANYTHING AS FAR AS WATER RETENTION IS CONCERNED AND FILTRATION TO GO BACK INTO THE BACK INTO THE LAGOON OR BACK INTO THE MARINA. IT'S IMPORTANT TO US ALSO BECAUSE WE LOVE THE MANATEES. WE LOVE THE TROUT WE LOVE THE RED FISH WE LOVE THE DOLPHIN WE HAVE REALLY SO WHAT WE'RE ALL ABOUT THAT. I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY THAT THAT'S PART OF MY LIFE AND MY CHILDREN'S LIFE ALSO. THANK YOU. THANK YOU SIR. ALL RIGHT. AT THIS POINT I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND BRING IT BACK TO THE BOARD FOR A MOTION. CAN WE ASK QUESTIONS. YOU HAVE A QUESTION FOR STAFF? I DO. SINCE GRAND AVENUE IS A PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET AND THE CITY MAINTAINS IT. CORRECT. RIGHT. RIGHT. IS THERE STOP SIGNS. I FINALLY REALIZE WHERE THEY'RE GETTING INTO VENETIAN BAY. IT'S ALONG THAT PEARL COURT OR SOMETHING. IS THERE A STOP SIGN COMING IN THE OTHER DIRECTION SO THEY HAVE TO STOP THERE BEFORE GOING ON TO GRAND AND THEN IS THERE ANOTHER STOP SIGN AT GRAND AND US 1. THERE IS A STOP SIGN AT GRAND AND US 1. I BELIEVE THERE'S ONE WHERE PEARL DUMPS INTO GRAND. OK. I DO NOT BELIEVE THERE IS A STOP SIGN ON GRAND JUST EAST OF PEARL. OK SO. OK. SO THERE'S NO STOP SIGN COMING OUT OF VENETIAN BAY'S DRIVEWAY TO STOP BEFORE THEY WOULD MAKE THE YOU KNOW THE TURN. THERE IS ONE ON PEARL. THERE IS ONE ON PEARL. COMING OUT OF VENETIAN BAY. THERE IS ONE BEFORE THEY GET TO GRAND. THEY CAN'T JUST BLOW THROUGH GRAND. OK. AND AS FAR AS THE ONE LADY SAID ABOUT STOPLIGHT THAT'S GOT TO BE THAT'S A U.S. HIGHWAY RIGHT. YES. SO THAT IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL? FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GOVERNS THAT RIGHT AWAY.OK. AND THERE WOULD NEED ARE OUT THERE BUT THAT WOULD BE SOMETHING THE DISTRICT 5 OFFICE WOULD REVIEW. FOR THE COUNTY YOU MEAN, DISTRICT 5. FDOT DISTRICT 5 OK BOARD DO I HAVE A MOTION PLEASE. MOTION TO APPROVE CP -7-2009 AND CPZ. JUST ONE PLEASE. ALL RIGHT.
CP-7-2019 SUBJECT TO ANY STAFF CONDITIONS. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? NANCY. IS THERE A WAY TO. WELL THIS IS IT'S A CITY OWNED ROAD.
PAT, I MEAN I AGREE THAT IF THERE'S YOU KNOW THERE'S A LOT OF PEOPLE COMING OUT MAYBE AFTER WORK. WHATEVER. I'M NOT SAYING IT'S THE EMPLOYEES. BUT THE SUGGESTION ABOUT SPEED BUMPS WOULD THAT BE SOMETHING THAT THE CITY WOULD HAVE TO PUT IN THEY'D HAVE WE'D HAVE TO MENTION IT TO THE PUBLIC WORKS OR IS IT SOMETHING THAT WE CAN ADD TO THIS. TYPICALLY THE CITY DOES NOT INSTALL SPEED BUMPS. IF THAT'S SOMETHING THE RESIDENTS WANT TO PROPOSE OR TO FUND THAT'S USUALLY HOW SPEED BUMPS GET PUT IN AND THE REST OF THE PARTS OF THE CITY WHAT WE CAN DO IS WE CAN RELAY TO THE CITY ENGINEER CONCERN FROM VENETIAN BAY IN [INAUDIBLE] COVE I'M ASSUMING REGARDING THE TRAFFIC ON GRAND AND HAVE THEM TAKE A LOOK AND SEE WHAT COULD BE DONE OUT THERE BUT SPEED BUMPS
[00:40:04]
ARE NOT TYPICALLY SOMETHING THAT THE CITY ACTUALLY INSTALLS. IN AND OF ITSELF. IT'S LIKE THERE'S SOME OUT HERE THAT ARE LIKE THEY WERE NAILED INTO THE MACADAM OR SOMETHING. YOU'RE WELCOME. THE LIBRARY PARKING LOT. YEAH. YOU KNOW. YEAH. IN THE PARKING LOT. YES. YEAH. WELL ON OUR PARKING LOT. NO NO I'M JUST SAYING. NO I'M JUST SAYING THAT THOSE TYPE I WAS MANNING THE TYPE. SOMETHING LIKE THAT. OK. SO THE CITY DOESN'T INSTALL THAT. SO WHAT HAPPENS THEN IS THE CITY'S INSTALLING SPEED BUMPS IN EVERYONE'S ROAD. BECAUSE ONCE YOU START DOING THAT THEN EVERYONE WANTS IT ON THEIR ROAD AS WELL. SO WHAT THEY DO IS THEY GET OUT THERE AND THEY LOOK AT THESE STUDIES THEY BUT THE LITTLE COUNTERS OUT THERE TO SEE THE TRAFFIC. YOU LOOK AT THE SPEED TRAVELING. BUT IF YOU LOOK AT LIKE TURKEY CREEK ESTATES THAT HAS SPEED BUMPS IN THERE THOSE WERE FUNDED BY THEIR ASSOCIATION, THE ONES THAT ARE ON MANDARIN DRIVE AFTER WORKING WITH PUBLIC WORKS. OK. SO IS IT PUBLIC WORKS THAT WE WOULD HAVE TO LOOK AT THAT.ABSOLUTELY. I HAVE A QUESTION. PAT, WITH REGARDS TO THAT WOULD THAT'S SOMETHING THE RESIDENTS WOULD HAVE TO JUST GO TO PUBLIC WORKS AND LET THEM KNOW THAT THEY HAVE A CONCERN AND SEE IF IT'S SOMETHING THAT'S WARRANTED? WE'LL RELAY THIS TO THE CITY ENGINEER. THE CONCERNS THAT WERE RAISED TONIGHT. THEY CAN CERTAINLY FOLLOW UP WITH THEIR OFFICE. THE ASSOCIATION I'M THINKING THAT COULD FOLLOW UP. IF I MAY. THE FIRE RESCUE WILL ALSO GET INVOLVED IN THAT BECAUSE THEY'RE THE ONES THAT DON'T LIKE THE SPEED BUMPS AND ESPECIALLY WITH THE FACILITY THERE THAT EXISTS BECAUSE EVERY TIME AN AMBULANCE GOES OVER SPEED BUMPS THEY ALL THEIR STUFF IN THE BACK GETS. FALLS OUT. YEAH. YEAH IT'S A MESS. SO IT'S ACTUALLY FIRE RESCUE THAT WOULD HAVE TO BE PART OF THE CONSULTATION AS WELL AND THEY'RE GENERALLY NOT IN FAVOR OF ON STREETS.
PARKING LOTS LIKE MR. MURPHY SAID IS A DIFFERENT STORIES. THE STREETS ARE A PROBLEM. THANK YOU. OK. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND IF THERE ARE NO MORE COMMENTS. ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. OPPOSED. MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY. PATRICK. NEXT CASE ON THE AGENDA IS CASE CPZ-7-2019. THIS IS THE COMPANION ZONING APPLICATION THAT JUST WENT WITH THE LAND YOU USE YOU HEARD. IT'S THE SAME LOCATION IN THE PROPERTY SAME ZONING SURROUNDING IT SAME USES. SO I'LL GO RIGHT TO THE ANALYSIS. THE APPLICANT REQUESTS A REZONING FROM RS3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO RM 20 MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT. THE APPLICANT IS STILL STEVEN CIANCI. PROVISIONS OF THE RM 20 ZONING DISTRICT ARE INTENDED TO APPLY TO AN AREA OF HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LOT HEIGHT AND OTHER RESTRICTIONS ARE INTENDED TO ACCOMMODATE AN INTENSE DEGREE OF DEVELOPMENT MAINTAINING ADEQUATE AMOUNTS OF OPEN SPACE FOR RESIDENTIAL USES SOME NON-RESIDENTIAL USES COMPATIBLE TO THE CHARACTER OF THE DISTRICT ARE ALLOWED AS STATED IN THE FLU REQUEST FOR CPZ-7-2019 SUBJECT PROPERTY IS BORDERED BY TWO SEVEN STORY CONDOMINIUM BUILDINGS TO THE NORTH BY SEVEN STORIES ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY TO THE EAST TO THE SOUTH AS A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN GRAND AVENUE. SOUTH OF GRAND AVENUE IS A FOUR STOREY CONDOMINIUM WITH MULTIPLE BOAT SLIPS AND TO THE WEST IS A STORM WATER RETENTION POND AND DRIVEWAY THAT BOTH SERVE THE VENETIAN BAY CONDOS.
THEREFORE STAFF BELIEVES THE REZONING QUEST WOULD BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE HIGH DENSITY ZONING DISTRICTS AND DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS OF THE SURROUNDING AREA. STAFF RECOMMENDATION STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST TO BE CONSISTENT AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF KCP 7-2019 OF THE BOARD JUST RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF. BE HAPPY ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE THE APPLICANT IS STILL HERE. DOES THE BOARD HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? SEEING NONE, WILL THE APPLICANT PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. I BELIEVE HE LEFT ACTUALLY I THINK HE WAS TALKING TO A RESIDENT. MR. CIANCIO, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. THEY WERE TRYING TO TALK ME INTO SPEED BUMPS. I UNDERSTAND. I APPRECIATE THAT. JUST REAL JUST BRIEFLY AGAIN JUST LET THE BOARD KNOW WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO DO HERE. WE'RE TRYING TO DO IS BASICALLY BUILD A PARKING LOT FOR OUR VISITORS AND FOR OUR RESIDENTS ON THE PROPERTY THAT WE JUST PURCHASED LAST YEAR THAT'S ADJACENT TO THE EXISTING PROPERTY THAT WAS APPROVED TO BUILD THE PHASE 2. THANK YOU. DOES THE BOARD HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. CIANCIO. SO THE PARKING LOT AND RETENTION POND IS ACTUALLY TO SERVICE BECAUSE YOU'RE BUILDING PHASE TWO. [INAUDIBLE] YEAH. WE'RE GONNA NEED ADDITIONAL PARKING. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? THANK YOU SIR. THANK YOU. IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE APPLICATION. ANYONE WHO WISH TO SPEAK OPPOSED TO THE APPLICATION. SIR. SAME OBJECTION. JUST YOUR NAME AND
[00:45:03]
ADDRESS PLEASE. OH BARRY HANDSON. I'M VENETIAN BAY 4955 DIXIE HIGHWAY NE NUMBER 402 PALM BAY FLORIDA. THANK YOU MR. HANSON. AND IT'S OUR SAME OBJECTIONS. NOTED. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK? SEEING NONE, I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND BRING IT BACK TO THE BOARD FOR A MOTION. WELL IS IT OKAY IF I SAY SOMETHING REAL QUICK? WELL I BELIEVE THAT THE APPLICANT IS SOMEWHAT DOING THIS IN GOOD FAITH. I THINK THAT EVEN HIM TAKING THE TIME TO TALK WITH SOME OF THE RESIDENTS TO GO OVER YOUR CONCERNS AND LISTEN TO YOUR CONCERNS AND I'M ALSO ONE FOR CONSERVATION. SO IT LOOKS AS IT IS IT SEEMS AS IF HE'S HE'S WILLING TO DO ANYTHING HE CAN TO HELP PRESERVE WHAT HE CAN PRESERVE. SO FOR THE PARKING AND THE RETENTION AREA TO SUPPORT THAT FACILITY IT SEEMS AS THOUGH THAT IS MUCH NEEDED. WE'VE ALREADY SO WITH THAT I'M GOING TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE CPZ-7-2019 WITH ALL STAFF'S RECOMMENDATIONS. DO WE HAVE A SECOND? WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? SEEING NONE, ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. ALL OPPOSED. MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY. YOU'VE GOT YOUR APPROVAL MR. CIANCIO. I THINK RIVERVIEW HAS BEEN REALLY A GREAT ADDITION TO THE CITY OF PALM BAY. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER BUSINESS PATRICK. YES I JUST WANTED TO[OTHER BUSINESS]
POINT OUT UNDER OTHER BUSINESS THAT THE NEXT BOARD MEETING IS BEING MOVED FROM JULY 3RD TO JULY 10TH AS WE DID NOT GET A QUORUM FOR THE JULY 3RD MEETING. AS YOU ALL KNOW YOU'VE BEEN CONTACTED BY SHANDRA AND WE DO HAVE A QUORUM FOR JULY 10TH AND THAT WILL BE A VERY BUSY MEETING. THANK YOU. FOR THE MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC HERE AGAIN. YOU KNOW SOME OF YOUR CONCERNS WERE AS FAR AS TRAFFIC GOES, YOU KNOW MR. MURPHY WILL SEND A REFERRAL TO PUBLIC WORKS. AND THEY'LL TAKE A LOOK AT IT AND IN ADDITION AS FAR AS YOUR CONCERNS ABOUT ABOUT THIS BEING SOME MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY BEING BUILT ON THIS PARKING LOT OR WHERE THE PARKING LOT IS APPROVED RIGHT NOW THAT'S NOT GOING TO HAPPEN ANYTIME SOON AND EVEN IF THEY WERE TO WANT TO DO THAT IN THE FUTURE THEY WOULD HAVE TO COME BACK THROUGH THE WHOLE PROCESS TO GET APPROVAL FOR IT. STILL NEED PARKING OK. MEETING IS ADJOURNED.* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.