Dec 10, 2025 Code Enforcement Special Magistrate

ALL RIGHT. WE'LL CALL THE DECEMBER 10TH, 2025 CODE ENFORCEMENT SPECIAL MAGISTRATE HEARING TO ORDER.

[SWEARING IN]

[00:00:07]

SO IF YOU IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK, PLEASE STAND AND RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND SO YOU CAN BE SWORN IN.

DO YOU SWEAR TO TELL THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH, AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH, SO HELP YOU GOD? THANK YOU. MAY BE SEATED.

OKAY. NEXT IS THE ADOPTION OF THE MINUTES, WHICH HAVE BEEN REVIEWED PRIOR TO THE HEARING AND HAVE BEEN APPROVED SO WE CAN MOVE ON TO BUILDING CODE COMPLIANCE HEARINGS.

[ADOPTION OF MINUTES]

[BUILDING CODE COMPLIANCE HEARINGS]

SO THAT IS CB 2642825 AT 5311 PINEWOOD DRIVE, NORTHEAST 2642925 AT 5325 PINEWOOD DRIVE, NORTHEAST 2643025 AT 5117 PINEWOOD DRIVE NORTHEAST AND 2643125 1254001 PINEWOOD DRIVE, NORTHEAST. MOVING ON TO BUILDING CODE COMPLIANCE REPORTS.

[BUILDING CODE COMPLIANCE REPORTS]

SCOTT STAFFORD, DEPUTY BUILDING OFFICIAL CITY OF PALM BAY.

WE HAVE A THIS PARTICULAR CASE WAS BROUGHT BEFORE YOU AUGUST 13TH WITH THE COMPLIANCE OF NOVEMBER 11TH FOR WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT FOR WINDOWS BEING INSTALLED. WE HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY APPLICATION TO THIS DATE FOR SUCH WORK.

OKAY. CAN I SEE THE FOLDER? IS THE OWNER HERE OR THE RESPONDENT? OKAY. ALL RIGHT. WELL. YOU WOULD JUST BE AUTHORIZING THEIR FINE IMPOSING THEIR FINE TODAY.

SO SOUNDS GOOD. HOW MANY HOW MANY VIOLATIONS DO WE HAVE HERE? SO TWO VIOLATIONS, SECTION 105.1 AND 100. NINE 109.4.

IS THAT CORRECT? OKAY. ALL RIGHT. SO. ALL RIGHT I'LL AUTHORIZE THE IMPOSITION OF A $50 A DAY FINE FOR EACH VIOLATION.

AND FOR EVERY DAY THAT THE VIOLATION PERSISTS.

THANK YOU. THANKS. THANK YOU. THANK YOU.

OKAY, MOVING ON TO CODE COMPLIANCE REPORTS. AUTHORIZATION TO IMPOSE FINES.

[CODE COMPLIANCE REPORTS]

THAT IS THE FIRST ONE. CB 2563925. AND.

TWO ONE. OKAY. THERE YOU GO. AND WE HAVE ONE CASE TO BE HEARD WHICH IS CB 2622125 AT THE SAINT JOHN'S HOA. ANGELICA SNEED, CODE COMPLIANCE OFFICER, CITY OF PALM BAY.

THE VIOLATIONS THAT STILL EXIST IS JUST THE SECTION 172 .006 WHICH IS THE CONSTRUCTION NOT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS, WHICH IS TO WIT, MISSING PLAYGROUND, WHICH HE ALREADY HAD.

IT'S NOT COMPLETED THE PLAYGROUNDS UP. HE JUST NEEDS TO PUT THE FENCE AROUND IT TO MAKE IT A COMPLETE PLAYGROUND.

SO HE IS WORKING ON IT. HE'S DONE A LOT AND HE'S HERE TO ASK FOR MORE TIME.

OKAY.

AS ANGELICA MENTIONED, WE HAD A. SORRY. CAN YOU PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD? OH, SORRY. ANDREW EVANS. WITH SAINT JOHN'S PRESERVE HOA.

WE'VE COMPLETED ALL THE OUTSTANDING LANDSCAPING ITEMS. WE'VE FULLY INSTALLED THE PLAYGROUND, INCLUDING THE MULCH AND THE BORDER AROUND IT. WE'RE JUST WAITING ON THE OUTSIDE FENCE. WE'VE PAID A DEPOSIT ON THAT. WE'RE JUST WAITING ON MATERIALS. TOLD IT'S GOING TO COME IN AFTER CHRISTMAS.

SO I THINK IF I COULD HAVE 30 DAYS THAT WE WOULD BE ABLE TO FINISH THAT FENCING.

OKAY. ARE THERE ANY OUTSTANDING, LIKE PERMIT ISSUES OR ANYTHING THAT YOU NEED TO RESOLVE? NOPE. NOT THAT I'M AWARE OF. OKAY. CITY HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THE 30 DAY EXTENSION?

[00:05:05]

APPRECIATE IT. THANKS. OKAY. THE CITY IS REQUESTING THAT THE CODE ENFORCEMENT SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FIND ALL RESPONDENTS OR CASES LISTED IN THE AUTHORIZATION TO IMPOSE FINES.

REPORT IN NONCOMPLIANCE UNLESS PREVIOUSLY HEARD FOR THE PERIOD STATED IN THE REPORT, AND IMPOSE THE FINES AS LISTED ON THE REPORT.

I FIND ALL OF THE RESPONDENTS CASES LISTED ON THE AUTHORIZATION TO IMPOSE FINES, REPORT IN NONCOMPLIANCE FOR THE PERIOD STATED ON THE REPORT, AND IMPOSE THE FINES AS LISTED ON THE REPORT DATED DECEMBER 10TH, 2025.

[CODE COMPLIANCE HEARINGS: PER DAY FINE]

LETITIA DEAN CODE COMPLIANCE. THE VIOLATIONS THAT STILL EXIST ON THE PROPERTY AT 871 HANEY STREET ARE SECTION 172.00 FOR USE OF STRUCTURE OR LAND WITHOUT THE REQUIRED CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.

SECTION 74.25 G. NO VEHICLE SHALL BE PARKED OR STORED UPON VACANT PARCEL OR LAND THAT DOES NOT HAVE A PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE WITH A VALID CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY ISSUED.

AND THEN SECTION 176 .00. SECTION B AND SECTION 1B1 MAINTAINING A PROHIBITED USE IN THE RIGHT OF WAY, TO WIT THE ILLEGAL DRIVEWAY. I HAVE THE PROPERTY OWNER HERE TO SPEAK ON HIS BEHALF.

OKAY. THANK YOU. CAN I HAVE THAT? THANK YOU.

GOOD AFTERNOON. GOOD AFTERNOON SIR. I OWN THE PROPERTY AT 871, WHICH IS A DOUBLE PLOT HOUSE IN THE MIDDLE. THE WAY THE FILL WAS FILLED IN, I CAN'T PUT ANOTHER GATE IN A DRIVE INTO THAT.

I HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO BUY THE LOT NEXT TO ME, WHICH IS 857.

AND THAT'S THE ONE THAT'S IN OUT OF COMPLIANCE.

I'VE MOVED SOME OF THE THERE WAS TWO VEHICLES THERE, AND MY BOAT.

I MOVED THE ONE VEHICLE ALONG TO MY DAUGHTER.

THE OTHER VEHICLE BELONGS TO MY SON. THE BOAT.

I'M TAKING OVER TO CARPE MARINA AND GRANT. I NEED MY SON TO PULL IT WITH HIS TRUCK.

HE DRIVES OVER THE ROAD. HE'S IN TEXAS. HE'LL BE BACK PROBABLY A COUPLE OF DAYS.

I ALSO NEED TO SPEAK WITH MY ATTORNEY, BECAUSE I GUESS IF I PUT THAT AS PART OF MY PROPERTY, I DON'T KNOW HOW IT AFFECTS MY MY FUTURE BECAUSE I'M NOT A YOUNG CHICKEN ANYMORE.

WHETHER IT CAN BE SUBDIVIDED LATER. SO IT'S AT THE FINANCIAL ASPECTS.

PLUS I'M IN THE PROCESS OF GETTING ESTIMATES IF I SHOULD GO TO WORK AND WHAT THE LEGAL IMPLICATIONS ARE WITH MY WILL AND TRUST WITH THAT PIECE OF PROPERTY, WHICH RIGHT NOW IT'S PART OF MY KIDS INHERITANCE IF AND WHEN I GO.

SO I'D LIKE TO GET SOME ADDITIONAL TIME TO EVALUATE THOSE THINGS.

AND LIKE I SAY, I NEED SOME OF HIS HELP PHYSICALLY TO REMOVE THEM, WHICH I CAN PROBABLY DO IN THE NEXT COUPLE OF WEEKS, BUT I'M GOING TO NEED NOBODY'S AVAILABLE BETWEEN CHRISTMAS AND HOLIDAYS TO TRY TO GET ESTIMATES, WHICH I HAVE ONCE I'M WORKING ON IT, BUT I NEED TO GET AHOLD OF MY ATTORNEY ON THE LEGAL ASPECTS OF IT.

SO I'D LIKE TO GET AT LEAST A COUPLE OF THREE MONTHS TO EVALUATE THOSE THINGS AND EITHER GO FORWARD OR JUST REMOVE IT AND BRING IT BACK TO ITS NATURAL STATUS. OKAY. I DON'T HAVE AN ISSUE GIVING YOU AN EXTENSION BASED ON, LIKE, THE NEED FOR YOUR YOUR YOUR SON'S TRUCK. I DON'T QUITE SEE HOW THE ESTATE PLANNING PART OF THIS FITS INTO INTO ANY OF THESE.

IT'S JUST. I REALLY I DON'T KNOW IF THAT CAN BE IF IT'S ADDED TO MY CURRENT PROPERTY, WHETHER IT IS JUSTIFIABLE BECAUSE.

I HAVE SEVEN CHILDREN, AND IT'S IN SORT OF THE STATE I HAVE WRITTEN IT.

[00:10:03]

AND THAT WOULD BE PART OF MY DECISION MAKING.

WHETHER I ACCESS THE PROPERTY AS PART OF MY PROPERTY AND THEN PAY THE EXPENSES OF PUTTING THE FENCING UP AND THE DRIVEWAY, APRON, ETC., TO MAKE IT IN COMPLIANCE TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE TOWN.

YEAH. OKAY. IT'S JUST PART OF THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS, AND I CAN'T REACH HIM NOW, BUT I AM IN THE PROCESS OF TAKING THE STUFF OFF.

I'M WAITING TO GET AN ESTIMATE TO DO THE WORK.

IF IT COULD BE DONE, THEN I HAVE TO MAKE A DECISION WHETHER I WANT TO INCORPORATE THAT AS PART OF MY EXISTING HOUSE BECAUSE THERE'S TWO SEPARATE DEEDS.

SO I'D LIKE TO, LIKE I SAY, A COUPLE OF THREE MONTHS TO EVALUATE THAT AND TO GET TO A POINT WHERE I CAN MOVE AHEAD OR JUST PUT IT BACK TO THE NATURAL STATE. OKAY. LATISHA, CAN I CAN YOU COME UP? I NEED TO I HAVE A FEW QUESTIONS FOR THE CITY.

SURE. OKAY. I'M A LITTLE CONFUSED BECAUSE, I MEAN, I JUST DON'T UNDERSTAND HOW, LIKE, THE ESTATE PLANNING ASPECT THAT HE'S TALKING ABOUT MATTERS FOR THIS.

SO I'D LIKE TO, IF YOU COULD, IF WE COULD. YOU AND I COULD JUST GO THROUGH EACH VIOLATION.

LIKE WHAT CAUSED THE VIOLATION AND WHAT WE NEED TO DO TO FIX IT.

OKAY. SO USE OF STRUCTURE OR LAND WITHOUT THE REQUIRED CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.

WHAT'S. SO BASICALLY, IT'S A VACANT PLOT OF LAND HE'S OWNED.

IT'S OWNED BY HIM, BUT IT'S NOT MARRIED TO HIS EXISTING HOME, WHICH HE'S SAYING IT'S ALREADY A DOUBLE LOT FOR THE EXISTING HOME.

IT'S NOT MARRIED TO CREATE THREE LOTS, IT'S JUST A SEPARATE LOT.

SO IN ORDER FOR YOU TO UTILIZE IT BY PARKING ON IT OR HAVING ANY KIND OF ITEMS ON IT, IT HAS TO BE MARRIED TO A PRIMARY RESIDENCE, WHICH IS THIS MAIN HOME. SO WHAT HE'S TRYING TO SAY IS HE'S TRYING TO KEEP HE'S TRYING TO DEBATE ON WHETHER TO KEEP IT SEPARATE AS AN INDIVIDUAL LOT OR TO MARRY IT WITH HIS EXISTING HOME AS THREE LOTS. OKAY, SO WHAT IS THE USE OR STRUCTURE OF HAVING THE VEHICLES PARKED ON IT? VEHICLES WITHOUT AND BEING ATTACHED? THAT IS SO THAT'S ESSENTIALLY THE SAME VIOLATION AS 74.25.

OKAY. SO WHAT ARE WHAT ARE THE VEHICLES THAT ARE CAUSING THE VIOLATION? SO WE HAD A BOAT AND THE VEHICLES. HE'S CURRENTLY WAITING TO MOVE THE BOAT.

THERE'S ONE MORE BOAT, I BELIEVE. JUST MY BOAT.

JUST ONE BOAT. ONE CAR AND A A CAR. OKAY, SO ONCE THOSE TWO ITEMS ARE OFF OF THE PROPERTY, THE FIRST TWO CAN BE CLOSED OUT AND THEN IT REMAINS WITH THE ILLEGAL DRIVEWAY, WHICH IS THE THE APRON THAT YOU SEE ON THERE.

AND HE'S TRYING TO FIGURE OUT THE BEST OPTION FINANCIALLY, WHETHER TO TAKE THE CULVERT OUT, WHICH THAT ESSENTIALLY WOULD CLOSE OUT THE VIOLATION AND RESET IT TO RESOD IT TO BACK TO ITS NATURAL STATE, OR TO HIRE A CONTRACTOR TO PUT THAT CONCRETE APRON AND GET THE DRIVEWAY PERMIT IN ORDER FOR HIM TO ACCESS THAT LOT.

OKAY. SO WHAT KIND OF. WHAT KIND OF TROUBLE ARE WE LOOKING AT FOR GETTING RID OF THE CULVERT? LIKE YOU SAID, THE PIT. IT'S GOING TO TAKE A LITTLE BIT.

HE HAS TO HIRE SOMEBODY TO TAKE THAT CULVERT, PIPE OUT IF HE'S GOING TO DO, AND THEN RESTART THE RIGHT OF WAY.

RIGHT. OKAY. AND SO FOR THE FIRST TWO, HAVE HAS ANY ACTION BEEN TAKEN TO TO MOVE THE MOVE STUFF? YES. HE'S MOVING. ONE CAR IS GONE. ALREADY GONE.

OKAY, SO HE'S ACTIVELY REMOVING THOSE. OKAY. OKAY.

NOW, NOW IT MAKES A LITTLE BIT MORE SENSE. OKAY.

I NORMALLY WOULDN'T BE TOO EXCITED ABOUT GRANTING AN EXTENSION JUST FOR, LIKE.

LIKE YOU WERE SAYING, ESTATE PLANNING PURPOSES, BUT I WOULD, I THINK PARTIALLY IS TO FOR THE CONTRACTOR SINCE WE'RE IN THE HOLIDAY.

YEAH, I THINK IT WOULD CAUSE IT COULD POTENTIALLY CAUSE UNNECESSARY WASTE TO MAKE HIM REMOVE THE CULVERT NOW AND THEN FIGURE OUT IF HE WANTS TO PUT THE DRIVEWAY IN.

YOU KNOW WHAT I'M SAYING? DOES THAT MAKE SENSE? RIGHT. OKAY.

SO DOES THE CITY HAVE A PROBLEM WITH. IS THERE ANY ISSUE WITH A THREE MONTH EXTENSION? NO. OKAY. BECAUSE, I MEAN, I WOULD THINK THAT THE I WOULD THINK THE BIG PROBLEM HERE WOULD BE.

WOULD BE POSSIBLE FLOODING FOR HAVING A DRIVEWAY IN THE CULVERT.

BUT WE'RE IN THE KIND OF THE DRY SEASON NOW, SO THERE IS A PIPE IN THERE.

THE MAIN ISSUE WITH THAT. EXCUSE ME. BEING UNPERMITTED, WE ARE NOT ABLE TO TELL IF IT'S AT THE CORRECT

[00:15:08]

BUT IF IT'S TOO LOW, IT COULD TRAP IT. BUT AT THE SAME TIME, THERE IS A PIPE THERE.

IF HE IS ACTIVELY WORKING ON IT, WE DON'T NECESSARILY HAVE AN ISSUE.

OKAY. GIVING YOU A TIME EXTENSION, YOU COULD SEE THE WATER IS CLEAR TO TO FLOW DOWN.

YEAH. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. SO IT, I THINK THE 90 DAY EXTENSION WOULD BE OKAY THEN.

SO WE'LL SET THE NEW DATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR FEBRUARY.

I'M SORRY, MARCH 10TH, 2026. AND THEN IT'LL BE $50 A DAY FOR EACH AND EVERY DAY THAT EACH VIOLATION IS STILL IN PLACE.

THANKS. THANK YOU. YOU'RE ALL SET? YEP. THANK YOU.

THANK YOU. OUR NEXT CASE IS CB 2643725. AND THAT'S AT 344 AVENUE SOUTHEAST.

THE CODE OFFICER IS ANGELICA SNEED. ACTUALLY, IT'S PHIL CLENDENIN.

WHAT'S UP? YEAH, IT WAS HER CASE, AND I GOT IT NOW.

SORRY. PHIL CLINTON AND CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF PALM BAY.

THE VIOLATIONS STILL EXIST. WHICH IS SECTION 172 .00 FOR USE OR STRUCTURE OF LAND WITHOUT THE REQUIRED CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.

BASICALLY STORING VEHICLE VEHICLES ON THE VACANT PROPERTY.

AND SECTION 174 .007 FAILURE TO OBTAIN A SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A FENCE.

HE PUT UP LIKE A LIKE A FENCE, A TEMPORARY FENCE.

SO THE RESPONDENT IS HERE. HE'S ASKING FOR MORE TIME.

OKAY? YEP. THANKS.

JOSEPH MANCUSO 344 I'VE. ALL RIGHT, TELL ME WHAT'S GOING ON HERE.

THE FENCE HAS BEEN REMOVED, AND WE'RE IN THE PROCESS OF REMOVING THE REMAINING CONTENTS ON THE PROPERTY.

OH, OKAY. JUST NEED A LITTLE BIT MORE TIME. SOME OF IT'S HEAVY EQUIPMENT.

SOME. IT'S GOING TO REQUIRE A LOWBOY. AS FAR AS TOW TRUCKS AND SO ON AND SO FORTH.

OKAY. JUST NEED SOME TIME TO ARRANGE THAT. I THINK IT COULD BE DONE WITHIN A 30 DAY TIME PERIOD.

ALL RIGHT. SO IT SOUNDS LIKE THE FAILURE TO OBTAIN A SITE APPROVAL IS HAS BEEN TAKEN.

YEAH. THAT SO THAT'S TAKEN CARE OF. CURRENT PHOTOS FROM THIS MORNING OF THE FENCE REMOVED. OKAY.

ALL RIGHT. SO YOU SAID 30 DAYS. YES, PLEASE. ALL RIGHT.

YEAH, WE CAN WE CAN DO THAT. WE'LL GRANT YOU A 30 DAY EXTENSION.

NO PROBLEM, SIR. JANUARY. WE'LL SET THE NEW DATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR JANUARY 9TH, 2026, AND THEN IT WILL BE A $50 A DAY FOR EACH VIOLATION, EVERY DAY THAT THAT THE VIOLATIONS CONTINUE. OKAY.

THANK YOU. APPRECIATE. THANKS.

OUR NEXT CASE IS CB 2644125. THIS IS AT 997 GULFPORT ROAD SOUTHEAST.

THE CITY IS CLOSING THIS CASE. HE WAS PRESENT, SO WE'RE JUST CLOSING IT OUT.

IT'S BEING WITHDRAWN FROM BY THE CITY. OUR NEXT CASE IS CB 2645225, AND THIS IS AT 600 BRISBANE STREET NORTHEAST.

THE CODE OFFICER IS CHRIS ROBINSON.

CHRIS ROBINSON CODE COMPLIANCE OFFICER. THIS IS IN REFERENCE TO A DILAPIDATED FENCE.

SECTION 174 .071. I SPOKE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER.

THEY'VE HAD A MEDICAL EMERGENCY, AND THEY'RE WAITING FOR THEIR SON TO COME OUT OF STATE TO HELP THEM REPAIR THE FENCE, AND THEY ASKED FOR 60 DAYS. OKAY. ANY ISSUE? ABSOLUTELY NOT.

OKAY, THEN WE'LL SET THE NEW DATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR FEBRUARY 8TH, 2026, AND THEN A $50 A DAY FINE FOR EVERY DAY AFTER THAT THAT THE VIOLATION IS STILL IN PLACE.

[CODE COMPLIANCE HEARINGS: SET FINE]

AND THE CODE OFFICER IS LETITIA DEAN. SCARLETT.

LETITIA DEAN. CODE COMPLIANCE. THE VIOLATIONS THAT STILL EXIST ON THE PROPERTY, LOCATED AT 405 SCARLETT ROAD, ARE SECTION 93.04, A ONE REQUIRING NUISANCE VEGETATION.

THE OWNERS ARE REQUESTING 45 DAYS EXTENSION IN ORDER FOR THEM TO COME INTO TOWN AND RECTIFY THE VIOLATION.

[00:20:07]

THEY JUST HAVE TO CUT 15FT FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.

OKAY. DO YOU GUYS HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THE 45 DAYS? ANY NEIGHBORS COMPLAINING OR ANYTHING? ALL RIGHT.

THEN, YEAH, WE DO HAVE A NEIGHBOR COMPLAINT. WELL, I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH 45 DAYS.

OKAY. ALL RIGHT. SO THAT WOULD BE JANUARY 24TH. OKAY, SO WE'LL SET THE NEW DATE OF COMPLIANCE AS JANUARY 24TH, 2026.

AND IF THE VIOLATION STILL PERSISTS AFTER THAT, IT'LL BE A $200 FINE AND THE CITY IS AUTHORIZED TO TAKE WHATEVER REASONABLE MEASURES IT NEEDS TO TO ADDRESS THE VIOLATION AND CHARGE THE COST OF DOING SO TO THE PROPERTY, ALONG WITH THE FINE. OKAY. THAT'S FINE. THANK YOU.

OKAY. WE DO HAVE A COUPLE OF PROPERTIES THAT HAVE COME INTO VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE.

THOSE ARE CB 2643425 AT 1906 SAGO PALM STREET NORTHEAST.

2644225 AT 1080 BRADDOCK AVENUE SOUTHEAST. 26450251 85 VENTNOR ROAD. NORTHWEST. 26480253. 85 WENDOVER ROAD SOUTHWEST.

26487254. 13 HILLCREST STREET. SOUTHWEST. 26488251.

56 WING ROAD. SOUTHWEST. 26490258. 37 TARR AVENUE.

SOUTHWEST.

THE FOLLOWING CASES ON THE PER DAY FINE. AGENDA ITEMS ONE THROUGH 25, UNLESS PREVIOUSLY HEARD,

[CODE COMPLIANCE HEARINGS: PER DAY FINE]

I FIND THAT ALL OF THE RESPONDENTS IN THE CASES LISTED BY THE SECRETARY ARE IN VIOLATION OF THE CODE SET FORTH IN THE STATEMENTS OF VIOLATION. THE RESPONDENTS IN THE CASES LISTED HAVE UNTIL DECEMBER 25TH, 2025, WHICH IS 15 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF THIS ORDER.

TO BRING THEIR PROPERTIES INTO COMPLIANCE, THE CITY IS AUTHORIZED TO IMPOSE A FINE OF $50 PER DAY FOR EACH AND EVERY VIOLATION THAT CONTINUES PAST THE DATE OF COMPLIANCE.

THE FOLLOWING CASES ON THE SET FINE AGENDA ITEMS ONE THROUGH 50, UNLESS PREVIOUSLY HEARD,

[CODE COMPLIANCE HEARINGS: SET FINE]

I FIND THAT ALL OF THE RESPONDENTS IN THE CASES LISTED BY THE SECRETARY ARE IN VIOLATION OF THE CODE SET FORTH IN THE STATEMENTS OF VIOLATION.

THE RESPONDENTS IN THE CASES LISTED HAVE UNTIL DECEMBER 20TH, 2025, WHICH IS TEN DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, TO BRING THEIR RESPECTIVE PROPERTIES INTO COMPLIANCE OR PAY A FINE OF $200.

I AUTHORIZE THE CITY TO TAKE ALL REASONABLE ACTIONS TO BRING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE, AND CHARGE THE PROPERTY OWNER WITH THE REASONABLE COST OF THE ACTIONS, ALONG WITH THE IMPOSED FINE. THE FOLLOWING CASES ON THE SET FINE AGENDA ITEMS 151 THROUGH 53, UNLESS PREVIOUSLY HEARD, WILL BE HEARD ON CONSENT WITHOUT FURTHER TESTIMONY AND THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE IS REQUESTED TO MAKE A DETERMINATION BASED UPON THE FILES PRESENTED. THE CITY REPRESENTS.

ALL RESPONDENTS HAVE BEEN SERVED A NOTICE REQUIRING CHAPTER 162 OF THE FOUR STATE STATUTES AND THE PALM BAY CODE OF ORDINANCES.

THE RESPONDENTS ARE PRESENT TO BE HEARD AND THE CASES HAVE NOT COME INTO COMPLIANCE. THE CITY IS SUBMITTING ALL EXHIBITS AND AFFIDAVITS INTO EVIDENCE IN THESE CASES, AND REQUESTS THAT THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FIND THE RESPONDENTS IN VIOLATION OF THE CODE SET FORTH IN THE STATEMENTS OF VIOLATION,

[00:25:02]

RESPONDENTS IN THE CASES LISTED HAVE UNTIL DECEMBER 20TH, 2025, WHICH IS TEN DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF THIS ORDER.

TO BRING THE RESPECTIVE PROPERTIES INTO COMPLIANCE OR THE CITY IS AUTHORIZED TO IMPOSE A SET FINE OF $200 FOR THE VIOLATION.

THAT IS ALL I HAVE FOR TODAY. ALL RIGHT. THERE IS NO NEW BUSINESS.

THEN WE WILL ADJOURN AND THE NEXT MEETING IS JANUARY 14TH, 2026.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.