[00:00:03] ALL RIGHT. GOOD EVENING, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN. WE'RE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND CALL THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 2026 TO ORDER. [CALL TO ORDER:] I'M GOING TO ASK EVERYONE IF THEY CAN TO REMEMBER TO GO AHEAD AND SILENCE YOUR CELL PHONES AT THIS TIME. AND I'M GOING TO ASK MR. CATALANO TO LEAD US IN THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS. ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. THANK YOU, SIR. MISS POWELL, THE ROLL, PLEASE. YES. MR. KARAFFA HAS ASKED TO BE EXCUSED. MR. WARNER. PRESENT. MR. CATALANO, PRESENT. MR. FILIBERTO. HERE. MR. HIGGINS. HERE. MR. MCNALLY HAS ASKED TO BE EXCUSED. MR. NORRIS. HERE. AND MISS BROCOLINI. HERE. CHIEF DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY TANYA EARLY IS PRESENT. WE HAVE A QUORUM. THANK YOU, MISS POWELL. ALL RIGHT. DO I HAVE A MOTION FOR THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE MINUTES FROM JUNE 3RD? [ADOPTION OF MINUTES:] MR. CHAIR, I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO PASS THE REGULAR MEETING MINUTES FROM JUNE 3RD, 2026. I'LL SECOND. OKAY. WE HAVE A FIRST AND A SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE AYE AYE. THANK YOU. FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE APPLICANTS AND THE [ANNOUNCEMENTS:] AUDIENCE, THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD IS AN ADVISORY BOARD COMPRISED OF UNPAID VOLUNTEERS. THE LAND DEVELOPMENT STAFF DIVISION STAFF WILL PRESENT THE STAFF REPORT FOR EACH CASE. BOARD MEMBERS WILL THEN BE ASKED IF THEY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF. THE APPLICANT OR THEIR REPRESENTATIVE WILL THEN BE ASKED TO APPROACH THE PODIUM AND PRESENT ANY INFORMATION GERMANE TO THE CASE, AND TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD. THE FLOOR WILL THEN BE OPEN FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS. WE WILL FIRST HEAR THOSE WISHING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE APPLICATION THAN THOSE IN OPPOSITION TO THE APPLICATION. FOR ALL PROCEEDINGS, ALL APPLICANTS SPEAKERS FROM THE AUDIENCE MUST SIGN A SPEAKER AND OATH CARD LOCATED AT THE AT THE SIDE OF THE OF THE ROOM AND AT THE PODIUM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY. SPEAK DIRECTLY INTO THE MICROPHONE AND STATE YOUR NAME, ADDRESS, AND COMMENTS FOR THE RECORD. AS A COURTESY, I ASK THAT IF. IF THERE IS A GROUP OF PEOPLE FROM A NEIGHBORHOOD. WHO MAY HAVE SIMILAR COMMENTS, YOU INFORM THE. APPOINT A SPOKESPERSON TO CLARIFY YOUR VIEWS. IN OTHER WORDS, IF. IF THEY'RE JUST TO KEEP THE MEETING MOVING ALONG. IF WE CAN JUST HAVE ANYBODY THAT IS SHARING THE SAME SENTIMENTS TO PLEASE JUST HAVE 1 PERSON COME UP AND TALK ABOUT IT. AFTER PUBLIC COMMENTS, I WILL BRING THE CASE BACK TO THE BOARD. AT THIS TIME, THE FLOOR WILL BE CLOSED TO. NO FURTHER COMMENTS WILL BE HEARD FROM THE AUDIENCE. I WILL THEN CALL FOR A MOTION AND A SECOND, AT WHICH TIME THE BOARD MAY HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS OR FURTHER DISCUSSION. I WILL THEN CALL FOR A VOTE. DECISIONS OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD. ZONING BOARD ARE THEN FORWARDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL DISPOSITION. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENDANCE AND YOUR COOPERATION AND ADHERING TO THE MEETING GUIDELINES. SO WITH THAT, [NEW BUSINESS:] WE'RE GOING TO MOVE FORWARD WITH CASE NUMBER CP25-0004. AND I THINK, MISS FLYNN. EVENING, VICE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD FOR THE RECORD, DEBBIE FLYNN, ASSISTANT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR. THE ITEM FOR CONSIDERATION IS CASE CP25-0004 A SMALL SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, FUTURE MAP AMENDMENT FROM PUBLIC SEMIPUBLIC TO RECREATION, OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION OPEN SPACE TO HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THE FLUME AMENDMENT TO ALLOW 76 TOWNHOME UNITS WITH INTERNAL CIRCULATION, PARKING, STORMWATER UTILITY CONNECTIONS, OPEN SPACE AND SUPPORTING SITE IMPROVEMENTS. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY CONSISTS OF 7.28 ACRES AND IS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TREELANDD BOULEVARD, SOUTHEAST IN SAN FILIPPO DRIVE SOUTHEAST. THE EXISTING FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION, AS I SAID, IS PUBLIC SEMIPUBLIC AND RECREATION OPEN SPACE. WHILE THE CURRENT ZONING DESIGNATION IS RM-15, WHICH PERMITS SINGLE FAMILY, TO FAMILY AND MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY VACANT. THE REQUESTED FUTURE LAND USE AMENDMENT WOULD ALIGN THE LAND USE DESIGNATION WITH THE EXISTING RM 15 ZONING AND FACILITATE THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 76 UNIT TOWNHOME COMMUNITY. JUST FOR A LITTLE BACKGROUND ABOUT THE PROJECTS. OUR PREVIOUS FLUME AMENDMENT BACK IN 23 WAS PROPOSING 140 UNIT MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT WAS DENIED BY CITY COUNCIL ON DECEMBER 2023 [00:05:05] DUE TO CONCERNS RELATED TO TRAFFIC, INFRASTRUCTURE, CAPACITY AND DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY. THE CURRENT PROPOSAL REDUCES THE RESIDENTIAL INTENSITY TO 76 UNIT TOWNHOME COMMUNITY WITH ACCESS TO SAN FILIPPO DRIVE AND TREELAND BOULEVARD. THE SITE IS ADJACENT TO EASTERN FLORIDA STATE COLLEGE AND NEAR EXISTING COMMERCIAL EDUCATION, EMPLOYMENT AND RECREATIONAL USES WITH ACCESS TO CENTRAL WATER, SEWER, SIDEWALKS AND PUBLIC TRANSIT. THE BREVARD PUBLIC SCHOOL CONFIRMED THAT A REVISED SCHOOL CAPACITY DETERMINATION WAS NOT REQUIRED, AS THE PROPOSED 76 UNIT DEVELOPMENT GENERATES FEWER IMPACTS THAN THE PREVIOUSLY EVALUATED 140 UNIT PROJECT. HOWEVER, A FINAL SCHOOL CONCURRENCY WILL BE REQUIRED WITH THE PROJECT SITE PLAN APPLICATION. ON THE ON YOUR SCREEN TONIGHT IS A CONCEPTUAL PLAN, BUT I'M GOING TO HAVE SHANDRA PASS OUT A REVISED CONCEPTUAL PLAN FOR YOU. RECENTLY AFTER THIS APPLICATION WAS SUBMITTED TO STAFF THE APPLICANT HAD ANOTHER CONCEPT PLAN FOR THE OFF SITE IMPROVEMENTS. AND REGARDING THAT THEY'RE STILL GOING TO PROVIDE THE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION ON TREELAND BOULEVARD AND A SOUTHBOUND LEFT TURN LANE. HOWEVER, THE 185 FOOT TAPER MIGHT BE CHANGING. THE APPLICANT AGREED TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITION. IF YOU AGREE TO PROVIDE THIS AS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR THEIR CONCEPT PLAN, THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT AN UPDATED TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND REVISED CONCEPT PLAN FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY COUNCIL. I'M SORRY, NOT BY THE CITY COUNCIL, BUT BE BY STAFF TO EVALUATE THE PROPOSED RIGHT IN RIGHT OUT ACCESS CONFIGURATION AT THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF DEVELOPMENT. THE UPDATED TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY SHALL IDENTIFY ALL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS NECESSARY TO MITIGATE DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS AND MAINTAIN THE ADOPTED LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS, INCLUDING ANY REQUIRED OFFSITE ROADWAY ACCESS, TURN LANE AND PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS. THE APPLICANT SHALL CONSTRUCT ALL IMPROVEMENTS IDENTIFIED IN THE STAFF APPROVED TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND INCORPORATED INTO THE APPROVED SITE PLAN PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. OUR STAFF OR TRAFFIC ENGINEER WILL REREVIEW A REVISED TRAFFIC STUDY AT SITE PLAN WITH ANY CONDITION. ANY IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE NECESSARY FOR THIS PROJECT WILL BE REQUIRED. BUT I DON'T HAVE THAT IN FRONT OF ME TONIGHT. A TRAFFIC STUDY WAS NOT A REVISED ONE WAS NOT PROVIDED PRIOR TO TONIGHT'S MEETING FOR THIS CHANGE FOR THEIR CONCEPT PLAN. SO IF YOU DO APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS TONIGHT, PLEASE APPROVE WITH THE APPLICANT WITH THE PAPER IN FRONT OF YOU. BUT PLEASE TAKE OUT CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL BECAUSE IT'S A IT'S A STAFF APPROVAL. THE REQUIRED CITIZEN PARTICIPATION MEETING WAS HELD ON JUNE 26TH, 2025 AT 1205 ELM STREET, CHARLES STREET WITH 6 INDIVIDUALS PARTICIPATING IN BOTH IN-PERSON AND VIRTUALLY, THE APPLICANT PRESENTED THE PROPOSED 76 UNIT TOWNHOME DEVELOPMENT AND EXPLAINED THAT THE REQUEST WOULD ALIGN WITH THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION WITH THE EXISTING RM 15 ZONING. DISCUSSION FOCUSED ON THE PROPOSED HOUSING TYPE, WHETHER THE UNITS WOULD BE RENTAL UNITS, AND THE REDUCED DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY COMPARED TO THE PREVIOUSLY DENIED PROPOSAL. NO ADVERSE COMMENTS, COMPLAINTS OR UNRESOLVED ISSUES WERE IDENTIFIED, AND ALL PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS WERE SATISFIED PURSUANT TO THE CITY'S LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. STAFF'S ANALYSIS EVALUATED THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION WITH THE EXISTING RM 15 ZONING ENTITLEMENT, AND SUPPORTS ADDITIONAL HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES NEAR EASTERN FLORIDA STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION PARK AND NEARBY COMMERCIAL AREAS. CITY WATER AND WASTEWATER FACILITIES ARE AVAILABLE. SCHOOL CONCURRENCY REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED AND THE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. A NEW ONE WILL EVALUATE THE ROAD NETWORK AND MAINTAIN THE ADOPTED LEVEL OF SERVICE. THE AMENDMENT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OBJECTIVES PROMOTING HOUSING DIVERSITY, MULTIMODAL CONNECTIVITY, AND EFFICIENT USE OF EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE. STAFF CONCLUDES THAT THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT SATISFIES THE APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA UNDER SECTION 172.021.C OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. THE REQUEST SUPPORTS HOUSING DIVERSITY, PROMOTES EFFICIENT, EFFICIENT USE OF EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE, PROVIDES COMPETITIVE COMPATIBILITY WITH SURROUNDING LAND USES AND MAINTAINS ADOPTED LEVEL OF SERVICE THROUGH THE REQUIRED TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS. THE AMENDMENT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND PROMOTES ORDERLY GROWTH WITHIN AN AREA ALREADY SERVED BY PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES. [00:10:04] THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE PROPOSED SMALL SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT FROM PUBLIC SEMIPUBLIC AND RECREATION OPEN SPACE TO HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL. THE FOLLOWING THE BOARD'S RECOMMENDATION, THE APPLICANT WILL PROCEED TO CITY COUNCIL TO FINAL CONSIDERATION IN ACTION. THIS IS A SMALL SCALE COMP PLAN AMENDMENT, SO IT JUST GOES TO CITY COUNCIL FOR ONE READING. ON YOUR SCREEN TONIGHT IS RECOMMENDED RECOMMENDATION FOR BOARD REQUESTS TO APPROVE APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENIAL. HOWEVER, PLEASE NOTE THAT THE CONDITIONS ON HERE IS. PLEASE DON'T FOLLOW. PLEASE FOLLOW THE HANDOUT THAT WAS PROVIDED TO YOU INSTEAD. AND STOPS HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. AND THE APPLICANT IS ALSO HERE TO MAKE THEIR PRESENTATION AS WELL. THANK YOU, MISS FLYNN. DO THE BOARD HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? SEEING NONE, I WILL OPEN THE FLOOR FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS. OKAY. GOOD EVENING GENTLEMEN. MY NAME IS MIGUEL [INAUDIBLE]. 2299 SOUTH HIAWASSEE ROAD, SUITE 306, ORLANDO 32835. WITH ME THIS EVENING I HAVE ENGINEER DANIELA GIRALDO, ENGINEER KYLE CHASTAIN, AND ATTORNEY JOSEPH KOVITZ. WE'RE HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAVE. AND AT THAT, I'M ALSO GOING TO DEFER NOW TO TO MY NAME IS JOE [INAUDIBLE]. I DO, YOU GOT IT PRETTY CLOSE. I DO WANT TO FIRST THANK MISS FLYNN AND STAFF FOR WORKING WITH OUR DEVELOPMENT TEAM ON GETTING THE APPLICATION HERE. I WANT TO THANK YOU ALL FOR YOUR SERVICE TO THE CITY AND LISTENING TO ME FOR A FEW MINUTES AS I EXPLAIN WHY WE'RE HERE TODAY, WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO. YOU KNOW, THE APPLICATION IS A SMALL SCALE FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT, THE GOAL OF WHICH REALLY IS TO CONFORM THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION TO THE ZONING. THE ZONING WAS ALREADY CHANGED TO RM 15. WHAT WE NEED TO DO IN THIS APPLICATION IS TO CONFORM THE FUTURE LAND USE DISTRICTS. RIGHT NOW THERE ARE 2 TO THE DISTRICT THAT IS APPROPRIATE FOR RM 15. WE'RE NOT ASKING AND WE DON'T NEED A CHANGE TO THE ZONING BECAUSE IT'S ALREADY THERE IN THE APPROVAL OF THIS, EVEN AFTER CITY COUNCIL REVIEW DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY CONSTRUCTION, RIGHT. IT STILL NEEDS TO GO TO STAFF FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL. SO ALL THIS DOES IS LETS US SUBMIT OUR ACTUAL SITE PLAN TO STAFF, GO BEYOND THE CURRENT CONCEPTUAL PLAN. FINAL APPROVAL THOUGH WILL STILL REMAIN WITH THE CITY IN WHAT THAT CURRENT CONCEPT PLAN IS. WHAT OUR OUR SITE PLAN WILL BE IS A 76 UNIT TOWNHOME PROJECT, WHICH IS A REDUCED PROJECT. AS YOU HEARD. THE APPLICANT TEAM BROUGHT A PROPOSAL BEFORE THE CITY BACK IN DECEMBER. WE HEARD CONCERNS AND COMMENTS. WE WORKED VERY HARD TO ADDRESS THOSE COMMENTS AND CONCERNS AND PREPARE THE APPLICATION. THAT'S BEFORE YOU TODAY. THE CURRENT CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN THAT IS BEFORE YOU TODAY, STAFF HAS CONCLUDED. WE ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. WE MEET CODE AND WE ARE COMPATIBLE WITH THE AREA. AS FAR AS THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT GOES. STAFF WILL LOOK AT ALL THE THE FINER POINTS AND DETAILS WITH THAT SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL. AND I WANT TO POINT OUT A FEW IMPORTANT THINGS FROM THIS STAFF REPORT. 1 OF THEM IS THE COMMENT THAT THIS PROPOSAL WILL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL WORKFORCE AND POTENTIAL STUDENT HOUSING OPTIONS IN AN AREA WITH EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE AND MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION ACCESS. SO WE BELIEVE THIS IS AN APPROPRIATE PROJECT FOR AN APPROPRIATE SITE TO FIT A REAL NEED IN THE CITY. THE APPLICANT HAS ALREADY DEVELOPED THE ILA APARTMENTS, WHICH ARE SORT OF TO THE SOUTHWEST. THE CONCEPT PLAN, I THINK, NOTES ILA 2. SO THIS IS INTENDED TO BE SORT OF IN THE SAME VEIN AS THOSE THAT CURRENT SUCCESSFUL EXISTING DEVELOPMENT THAT'S THERE IN THE STAFF REPORT. STAFF DOES A GOOD JOB OF GOING THROUGH ALL THE FACTORS UNDER UNDER THE COMP PLAN, UNDER THE CODE, UNDER THE FLORIDA STATUTES EXPLAINING WHY THIS PROPOSAL IS APPROPRIATE. IT'LL HAVE A FAVORABLE EFFECT ON THE ECONOMY AND CITY BUDGET. IT WILL HAVE NO ADVERSE EFFECT ON PUBLIC FACILITIES OR LEVELS OF SERVICE. [00:15:02] THE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS NO OBJECTION. THE CITY WATER AND SEWER SERVICES EXIST. NO ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. FAVORABLE IMPACT ON HOUSING IT EXPANDS WORKFORCE AND STUDENT HOUSING NEAR EFSC AND EMPLOYMENT CENTERS. IT PROMOTES INFILL DEVELOPMENT USING EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AGAIN, PARTICULARLY FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT. OBJECTIVE 1.3 REGARDING SUSTAINABLE NEIGHBORHOODS, ITS COMPATIBILITY WITH THE SURROUNDING USES. IT'S COMPATIBLE WITH THE INSTITUTIONAL, RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL AND RECREATIONAL USES THAT ALREADY EXIST IN THE AREA. AND WITH THE RM 15 ZONING, THE PROPERTY ALREADY HAS STAFF DETERMINED IT PROVIDES AN APPROPRIATE TRANSITION BETWEEN THE HIGHER INTENSITY USES ASSOCIATED WITH THE COLLEGE AND THE LOWER DENSITY NEIGHBORHOODS TO THE SOUTH AND THE WEST, I BELIEVE IT IS CONSISTENT WITH POLICIES ABOUT NOT CREATING INEQUITIES. SO IT PROMOTES EQUITABLE ACCESS TO HOUSING NEAR JOBS, TRANSIT AND SERVICES. AS I SAID, AS STAFF SAID, THE SCHOOL BOARD ALREADY FOUND THERE WAS SUFFICIENT CAPACITY UNDER THE ORIGINAL HIGHER DENSITY APPLICATION. SO THIS LOWER DENSITY APPLICATION THERE'S SUFFICIENT CAPACITY IN THE SCHOOL SYSTEM TO ABSORB THE NEW STUDENTS. TRAFFIC, SO THE APPLICANT DID SUBMIT A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. I'M GOING TO TALK ABOUT THAT FOR A MINUTE OR 2 AT THE END BECAUSE IT REPRESENTS THE CHANGE AND THE NEW CONDITION OF APPROVAL THAT WAS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD BY STAFF. BUT ACCORDING TO THE STUDY, THE INTERSECTIONS OPERATE AT AN APPROPRIATE LEVEL OF SERVICE ALREADY. AND THE REDUCTION IN UNITS ACTUALLY REPRESENTS A SIGNIFICANT DECREASE IN TOTAL TRIPS. AND IT'S ABOUT 1000 FEWER TOTAL DAILY TRIPS WITH THE NEW DENSITY. I'M NOT GOING TO GO OVER ITEMS THAT STAFF ALREADY COVERED. BUT, BUT AGAIN, I'M SURE YOU ALL KNOW. BUT JUST TO HIGHLIGHT THAT DETAILED ENGINEERING, STORMWATER, ENVIRONMENTAL AND TRANSPORTATION COMPLIANCE, AS FAR AS CODE GOES, AS FAR AS CITY REQUIREMENTS WILL BE DONE DURING SITE PLAN REVIEW. AND NOW TURNING TO THE CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN, THE CONCEPT PLAN SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICATION MATERIALS FOR THE ACTUAL DEVELOPMENT IS THE CONCEPTUAL PLAN MEANING THE BUILDINGS AND THE LAYOUT AND THE SPACING. THE CHANGE THAT WAS PROPOSED GOES TO ACCESS. IT, THE CHANGE IS MOVING THE ACCESS SITE A LITTLE BIT TO THE SOUTH. YOU SHOULD HAVE THE REVISED CONCEPTUAL PLAN THERE. WE FEEL THE NEW ACCESS LOCATION BETTER SERVES THE RESIDENTS. IT BETTER SERVES THE CITY'S NEEDS. STAFF HAS INDICATED THAT THE CHANGE TO THE SITE PLAN WILL REQUIRE A NEW TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS AND THE RESULTS OF THAT, WHATEVER THE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS SAYS, AS FAR AS OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS GO. ONCE THOSE ARE APPROVED BY STAFF UNDER THE NEW CONDITIONS, STAFF HAS, THE REVISED CONDITION STAFF HAS PRESENTED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE REQUIRED TO BUILD THOSE OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE SUPPORTED BY THE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS, THE REVISED ONE THAT IS SUBMITTED. THE APPLICANT TEAM IS AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS. IF YOU HAVE SPECIFIC ENGINEERING OR TRANSPORTATION QUESTIONS, I WOULD DEFER TO OUR ENGINEERING EXPERTS ON THAT, BUT OTHERWISE I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU ALL HAVE. THANK YOU. BOARD. HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANTS? I DO, I HAVE 3 QUESTIONS OR I'M A LITTLE STILL CONFUSED. ARE THEY GOING TO BE APARTMENTS OR TOWNHOMES? THEY ARE GOING TO BE TOWNHOMES. SO IT'S 76 TOWNHOMES. AND ARE THEY RENTAL OR SALE? FOR SALE. ARE THEY GOING TO BE RENTAL UNITS OR ARE THEY GOING TO BE SOLD. AND WE CAN TALK ABOUT THAT IN A LITTLE MORE DETAIL. BUT IN THE APPLICATION PACKET ASSOCIATED WITH THE COMMUNITY MEETING MATERIALS, THERE ARE SOME RENDERINGS OF [00:20:06] OF WHAT THE EXTERIOR UNITS WILL LOOK LIKE. I BELIEVE THERE ARE JUST CONCEPTUAL RENDERINGS AT THIS POINT, BUT THEY ARE IN THE AGENDA PACKET. OKAY. I GUESS I, I HAVE ANOTHER QUESTION. THE HOW MANY SQUARE FEET WILL THEY BE APPROXIMATELY? THERE ARE DIFFERENT PRODUCT SIZES, I BELIEVE. AND AGAIN, WE'RE AT THE CONCEPTUAL PLAN STAGE RIGHT NOW. YOU SHOULD HAVE A FOOTPRINT, RIGHT, OF WHAT THE UNITS ARE GOING TO BE ON THAT CLUSTER. WHAT'S THE CLUSTER? AN AVERAGE SIZE I'M LOOKING. OKAY. THANK YOU. AND MY LAST QUESTION IS THE AVERAGE RENTAL. WHAT'S WHAT'S GOING TO WHAT'S WHAT ARE THE RENTAL AVERAGE RENTAL COSTS GOING TO BE? SURE. YOU HAVE THAT IN YOUR PROFORMA OR YOUR. UNFORTUNATELY. NO BUSINESS PLAN. EVERYTHING IS GONE. THERE'S NOTHING I CAN I CAN GIVE YOU A SOLID NUMBER. OF WHAT THE COST. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. I GOT A QUICK QUESTION. WHERE'D YOU GET THAT SUIT? MAN, THAT THING'S SHARP. THANKS. WE CAN TALK AFTER. MR. CHAIR, MR. PHILIP. THANK YOU. SO I'M LOOKING AT YOUR CONCEPT PLAN HERE. WHAT I FIND KIND OF INTERESTING IS THAT WHERE'S YOUR STORM WATER GOING TO GO? I'LL DEFER TO OUR ENGINEER. COULD YOU COME TO THE PODIUM SO THAT WE CAN MAKE SURE TO GET EVERYTHING RECORDED? THANK YOU. GOOD EVENING. KYLE CHASTAIN WITH BOWMAN, 4450 WEST EAU GALLIE BOULEVARD. SO THIS SITE IS PART OF THE MASTER STORMWATER SYSTEM THAT SERVES THE SURROUNDING AREA. YOU CAN SEE ON THE CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN THERE'S A THERE'S A POND DIRECTLY TO THE EAST OF THE SITE. AND THIS SITE IS PERMITTED TO DISCHARGE INTO THAT POND. OKAY. I'M GOING TO ASK THE SAME QUESTION OF STAFF JUST TO CONFIRM WHAT YOU SAID. BUT BUT THANK YOU. YEAH. THERE'S A SAINT JOHN'S PERMIT THAT EXISTS FOR THIS AREA, AND WE'RE GOING TO COMPLY WITH ALL REGULATIONS IN THAT PERMIT IN ORDER TO CONNECT. THANK YOU. YEP. YOU'RE WELCOME. ARE THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANTS. DO THE APPLICANTS HAVE ANYTHING ELSE YOU WANT TO WANT TO ADD AT THIS POINT IN TIME? NO, WE'RE GOOD FOR WHATEVER YOU ALL NEED. THANK YOU. THEN I CAN OPEN THE FLOOR FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS. SO FIRST I WANT TO OPEN THE COMMENTS FOR THOSE THAT ARE IN FAVOR OF THIS PROJECT. IN FAVOR OF MR. BATTEN. BILL BATTEN 586 OCEAN SPRAY STREET, SOUTHWEST. I'M NOT SO MUCH IN FAVOR. AND I'M ALSO NOT AGAINST. BECAUSE THE CURRENT ZONING. THIS IS ALREADY RM15 FOR THE ZONING. BUT SINCE THE COMP PLAN. THAT'S WHERE THE CONFLICT LIES. YOU CAN'T HAVE ONE CHANGE WITHOUT THE OTHER. BUT IT GENERATES A CONCERN THAT I'M TRYING TO. I'M TRYING TO LEAD TO. SO I'LL GO AHEAD AND GO THROUGH MY CONCERNS. AND THAT MIGHT MAKE A DIFFERENCE IF WE WANT TO CHANGE OR NOT CHANGE THE COMP PLAN. SO THEY COULD NEVER PROCEED WITH THE DEVELOPMENT. RIGHT. THE FIRST ONE WAS NO ON SITE WATER RETENTION. WHEN I'M LOOKING AT THEIR AT THEIR LAYOUT FOR THEIR CONCEPTUAL PLAN, I DIDN'T SEE ANY ON SITE OF THEIR LAND. THAT WAS WATER RETENTION. NUMBER 2, IT WAS A VERY LOW PERCENTAGE OF PREVIOUS AREA VERSUS NON PREVIOUS PERVIOUS AREA FOR LAND MASS IN A LOW ELEVATION SITE. NUMBER 3 EXIT TO THE SAN FILIPPO HEADING NORTH. THAT MEANS YOU HAVE TO CROSS SAN FILIPPO ROAD. NOW, I DON'T KNOW HOW MANY OF YOU PEOPLE DRIVE THAT. IT'S ALREADY. SO THE PEOPLE THAT WANT TO AVOID THE TRAFFIC LIGHT ARE GOING TO TRY TO SHOOT RIGHT OUT INTO THE TRAFFIC AND HAVE CROSS TRAFFIC TRYING TO GO TO HEADING NORTH OUT OF THEIR DEVELOPMENT. OR ARE THEY GOING TO TRY AND ALL COME OUT ON TREELAND WHERE THEY'LL ACCESS ONTO A LIGHT? I'M JUST TRYING TO HELP ALLEVIATE SOME OF THAT FUTURE SIGHT PROBLEMS. NUMBER 4, WHAT IS THE OUTCROP BUILDING THAT'S SHOWING IN THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THAT SITE PLAN? I HAVEN'T SEEN THE REVISED SITE PLAN THAT WASN'T IN THE PACKET. AND YOU KNOW ME, I LIKE TO REVIEW STUFF. SO I WAS JUST CURIOUS WHAT THAT SOUTHWEST BUILDING WAS. IT'S GOT A WEIRD SHAPE AND ASPECTS IN IT. NUMBER 5, THE SCHOOL BOARD ANALYSIS. [00:25:01] THIS WAS ON PAGE 9 AND 10. IT SAYS FOR 140 HOMES, BUT IT'S NOW AT 76 HOMES. IT ONLY SHOWED 25 STUDENTS. UNLESS I MISREAD THAT, WHEN I'M LOOKING AT THAT PACKET, IT ONLY SAID FOR ALL 3 GROUPS OF STUDENTS, 25 STUDENTS. I FIND THAT STRANGE. NUMBER 6. CITY COUNCIL IS CURRENTLY CURRENTLY CONSIDERING HAVING TO BUY OPEN SPACE PROPERTY. THEY'RE CONSIDERING LOOKING AT A $7 MILLION PURCHASE OF THE GOLF COURSE. YET HERE'S A PIECE OF PROPERTY THAT'S ALREADY OPEN SPACE. WHY ARE WE GOING TO SPEND MONEY WHEN WE CAN ALREADY HAVE OPEN SPACE PROPERTY? ACCORDING TO OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, EITHER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS GOING TO REGULATE WHAT THEY HAVE TO DO, OR OUR ZONING IS GOING TO REGULATE WHAT THEY HAVE TO DO. BUT YOU CAN'T. THEY BOTH HAVE TO BOTH COINCIDE. I'M JUST NERVOUS BECAUSE IF THE CITY IS CONSIDERING BUYING OPEN SPACE PROPERTY, WHY WE'RE GOING TO ALLOW THIS OPEN SPACE ALREADY THAT'S IN OUR COMP PLAN NOW BECOME A HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, RIGHT? AND THEN THE OTHER SIDE I HAD WITH THIS ONE, BECAUSE YOU KNOW ME, I LIKE TO GO THROUGH MY PACKETS AND REVIEW THEM. THE REVISED CONCEPT WAS NOT IN THE PUBLIC ACCESS. SO HOW DOES THE PUBLIC COME AND ADDRESS A THE COUNCIL WITHOUT ACTUALLY SEEING THE STUFF THAT'S IN THE PACKET. I KNOW THAT'S NOT ON YOU. YOU YOU CAN ONLY PRESENT TO ME WHAT THERE IS, BUT IT'S STILL A CONCERN THAT I, AS A RESIDENT, WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS. THANK YOU. BUT LIKE I SAID, THEY ARE ALREADY ZONED RM 15, BUT THEY CAN'T DO ANYTHING IF WE DON'T CHANGE THE COMP PLAN. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS PROJECT? ALL RIGHT. IS THERE ANYONE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION TO THE PROJECT? HOW YOU DOING, ELI [INAUDIBLE] I LIVE ON 757 UNDERHILL. I'LL MAKE SURE YOU FILL OUT ONE OF THOSE OATH CARDS FOR ME, PLEASE. THANK YOU. MY CONCERN WOULD BE TRAFFIC. I HEARD THAT THE TRAFFIC STUDY WILL BE OR HAS ALREADY TAKEN PLACE, BUT I DON'T THINK THAT WOULD TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THE NEW APARTMENT COMPLEXES OR BUSINESSES THAT ARE BEING BUILT DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET ON SAN FILIPPO. ALREADY, THE TRAFFIC ON THAT ROAD IN THE MORNINGS ESPECIALLY, IS ALREADY EXTREMELY BAD. AS SOON AS I COME OUT ON SAN FILIPPO, I'M SITTING IN TRAFFIC UNTIL I GET TO MALABAR ROAD. SO SOMETIMES THAT TAKES ABOUT 20 MINUTES JUST TO GO, WHAT, A MILE AND A HALF? WE ADD 76 MORE HOMES ON TOP OF THE APARTMENTS BEING BUILT ALREADY ACROSS THE STREET WITH THOSE BUSINESSES. HOW IS THAT GOING TO IMPACT TRAFFIC, ESPECIALLY IF WE PUT A LIGHT RIGHT THERE AT TREELAND AND SAN FILIPPO, THERE'S NOT MUCH ROOM BETWEEN THAT INTERSECTION AND THE INTERSECTION RIGHT BELOW THE FOUNDATION. THAT'S PROBABLY GOING TO BACK UP REALLY BAD. IF THE TRAFFIC STUDY IS NOT DONE WELL AND THE TRAFFIC LIGHTS ARE NOT CALIBRATED FOR THAT. SO THAT WOULD BE MY CONCERN. TO FILL THIS OUT. YES, SIR. THANK YOU. ARE YOU FREE TO TAKE IT BACK TO YOUR SEAT IF YOU WOULD LIKE. AND THEN JUST TURN IT IN. GOOD AFTERNOON. BASICALLY MY SAME COMMENTS AS MY NEIGHBOR THERE. OUR CONCERN IS THE TRAFFIC. YOU HAVE A LOT OF DEVELOPMENT HAPPENING ALL OVER THE PLACE. BUT KNOWING THAT THIS. COULD YOU JUST GIVE ME ONE SECOND? COULD YOU STATE YOUR NAME AND YOUR ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD? 739 UNDERHILL AVENUE. JONATHAN CAMERE AND I'M BASICALLY LIVING JUST SOUTH OF THIS PROPOSED BUILDINGS. YOU'RE BASICALLY GOING TO EXPAND, YOU KNOW, 70 SOMETHING HOUSING. MULTIPLY THAT TIMES 2 FOR CARS. THAT'S JUST GOING TO CREATE A LOT MORE TRAFFIC. SO PRETTY MUCH THE SAME THAT HE'S SAYING. THAT'S MY CONCERN. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE THAT WOULD LIKE TO COMMENT OR SPEAK IN OPPOSITION TO THIS PROJECT? GOING ONCE. TWICE. ALL RIGHT. WELL, I'M GOING TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC COMMENTS AND BRING IT BACK FOR THE APPLICANT TO COME BACK AND TO RESPOND TO ANY OF THE THINGS THAT PEOPLE WERE IN FAVOR OF OR AGAINST. THANK YOU. SO, YOU KNOW, AS OUR ENGINEER SAID, WE HAVE A PERMIT TO DISCHARGE STORMWATER INTO THE WATER BASIN BEHIND OUR PROPERTY. OBVIOUSLY WE HAVE TO COMPLY WITH THE TERMS OF THE PERMIT. [00:30:05] SO FROM OUR PERSPECTIVE, WATER STORMWATER IS APPROPRIATELY HANDLED IN THE SITE AS DESIGNED. OBVIOUSLY WE HAVE TO SUBMIT THE SITE PLAN TO STAFF FOR STAFF REVIEW. AND THE STORMWATER SYSTEM WILL BE HEAVILY VETTED AND WILL BE, YOU KNOW, THERE ARE SAFEGUARDS TO MAKE SURE WE APPLY, WE COMPLY WITH CODE AND ALL APPROPRIATE REQUIREMENTS. AS FAR AS THE TRAFFIC CONCERNS AGAIN, WE HAVE AN OBLIGATION TO SUBMIT A TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAFFIC STUDY THAT LOOKS AT THOSE INTERSECTIONS. WE HAVE TO SUBMIT IT TO STAFF. STAFF HAS TO LOOK AT THE METHODOLOGY OF THE STUDY, LOOK AT THE CONCLUSIONS STAFF HAS TO VET IT, MAKE SURE STAFF AGREES WITH IT AND ANY NECESSARY OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS THAT COME OUT OF THAT TRAFFIC STUDY. ACCORDING TO THE PROPOSED CONDITION OF APPROVAL, WE WOULD HAVE TO BUILD. SO ANY TRAFFIC IMPACTS CAUSED BY THE DEVELOPMENT, WHICH IS ALL WE CAN BE CHARGED WITH DEALING WITH. WE CAN'T BE CHARGED WITH WITH FIXING EVERY, YOU KNOW, ISSUE THAT MAY ALREADY EXIST IN THE WORLD, BUT ANY INCREASED IMPACTS THAT ARE CAUSED BY OUR DEVELOPMENT UNDER THE STAFF CONDITION WE HAVE TO ADDRESS AND WE HAVE TO TO MITIGATE THE REFERENCE TO THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS, NOT MATCHING THE ZONING. MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT IT WAS THE CITY WHO CHANGED THE ZONING TO ARM 15 AT SOME POINT. SO THE CITY MADE AN AFFIRMATIVE DECISION TO DESIGNATE THIS AREA FOR HIGHER DENSITY DEVELOPMENT AT SOME TIME. FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS WERE NEVER CHANGED. THEY ARE A RELIC OF BYGONE DAYS, PERHAPS WITH DIFFERENT ZONING. AND AS THE GENTLEMAN SAID, WE NEED TO CHANGE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS TO DO ANYTHING WITH THE PROPERTY. RIGHT. IF WE DON'T GET THE FUTURE LAND USE CHANGED. IT EFFECTIVELY HAMSTRINGS OUR EFFORT TO USE THE PROPERTY PRODUCTIVELY TO BENEFIT THE CITY IN THE AREA. SO WE AGAIN DO RESPECTFULLY REQUEST A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL FROM THE BOARD FOR FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT. I WILL CHECK WITH MY TEAM TO MAKE SURE. ARE THERE ANY OTHER ISSUES WE WANT TO RESPOND TO? THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. BOARD. I'M GOING TO BRING EVERYTHING BACK TO THE BOARD. AND I JUST NEED THE BOARD TO MAKE A MOTION SO THAT WE CAN OPEN THIS UP FOR DISCUSSION. OR IF YOU HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS YOU WOULD LIKE TO ASK, THIS WOULD BE THE TIME TO DO SO. MR. CHAIR, I WAS WONDERING IF I MAY SPEAK WITH STAFF ABOUT THE STORMWATER. YES, SIR. SO REGARDING THE STORMWATER PERMITTING I'VE ALWAYS SEEN STORMWATER HELD ON SITE. IT'S KIND OF THE FIRST TIME I'VE EVER SEEN STORMWATER BEING DISCHARGED INTO ANOTHER POND. SO WHO WHO WOULD OWN THIS POND? I GOOD EVENING, DEBBIE FLYNN. I'M NOT AWARE OF WHO OWNS THE POND, BUT IT'S FOR ANOTHER DEVELOPMENT. I BELIEVE IT'S FOR THEIR OTHER APARTMENT COMPLEX THAT THEY MENTIONED NEAR THEM THAT THEY HAVE THE POND SITE. THE I'M NOT AWARE OF WHO OWNS THE POND CURRENTLY. BECAUSE TONIGHT THE LAND USE IS A LAND USE CHANGE. IT'S NOT A SITE PLAN CHANGE. THIS IS A CONCEPT PLAN THEY HAVE. SO WHEN THEY SUBMIT THEIR SITE PLAN, THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO PROVIDE UTILITIES, THEIR POND SITE, ALL THE ENGINEERING DESIGN GUIDELINES, DESIGN REQUIREMENTS PER OUR LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AND PUBLIC WORKS MANUAL. AND OUR ENGINEERS WILL BE REVIEWING THAT. AND THAT'S PART OF THEIR REVIEW FOR A SITE PLAN TONIGHT. I'M SORRY, I'M NOT AWARE OF WHO OWNS THAT POND. BUT WHEN THEY DO SUBMIT THEIR SITE PLAN, IT'LL BE A REQUIREMENT WITH THEIR WITH THEIR PLAN SET. OKAY. IF THIS WAS TO GO THROUGH WITH NO ON, ON SITE STORMWATER RETENTION. DO YOU BELIEVE THAT THIS POND COULD HOLD A HUNDRED YEAR STORM VOLUME? I'M NOT AN ENGINEER. AN ENGINEER WOULD HAVE TO ANSWER THAT. BUT I DON'T WANT TO ANSWER THAT BECAUSE I'M A PLANNER, SO I DON'T KNOW THE, THE, HOW MUCH A POND COULD HOLD FOR 100 YEAR STORM. DO WE HAVE AN ENGINEER HERE? I DON'T. WE DO NOT HAVE A CITY ENGINEER REPRESENTED AT THIS MEETING TONIGHT. WHAT I CAN TELL YOU IS THAT FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW, WE DO HAVE THE CITY ENGINEER REVIEW THE SITE PLAN. AND THERE IS AN ELEMENT OF REVIEW FOR THE ON SITE STORMWATER AND DRAINAGE. OKAY. THAT'S SOMETHING THEY HAVE TO MEET IN ORDER TO GET THE SITE PLAN APPROVED. [00:35:02] THANK YOU, MR. CATALANO. YEAH, I JUST HAD A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS FOR STAFF. I KNOW A LITTLE WHILE BACK WE WERE CONCERNED ABOUT FIRE AND POLICE RESPONSE TIME. DOES THIS HAVE THEY DONE ANY KIND OF STUDIES ON FIRE AND POLICE RESPONSE? THIS THIS PROJECT WAS NOT COMPLETED FOR A CONCURRENCY REVIEW FOR FIRE AND POLICE. THEY DID NOT PROVIDE ANY ANYTHING AND YAY OR NAY REGARDING THIS PROJECT. THIS IS A 76 UNIT APARTMENT. I MEAN, TOWNHOME COMPLEX IS NOT ONE OF OUR LARGE PUDS THAT HAVE THOUSANDS OF UNITS THAT THEY WOULD HAVE TO RESERVE THEIR TIME, THEIR EFFORTS TO GETTING HERE IN TIME. BUT THAT WAS NOT PART OF THE REPORT. OKAY. THANK YOU. THE OTHER, THE ONLY OTHER QUESTION I HAD WAS THE UNITS THAT ARE AROUND THERE. THEY SAID THERE'S SOME APARTMENTS BEING BUILT ACROSS THE STREET. IS THAT CORRECT? AND THEN WHAT ARE THE UNITS AROUND THAT, THAT SITE. THEY MOSTLY SINGLE FAMILY HOMES OR ARE THERE, IS THERE ANY OTHER RENTAL? IT'S A COMBINATION OF APARTMENTS AND SINGLE FAMILY HOMES IN THIS AREA. I DON'T KNOW THE NUMBER OF UNITS THAT THEY'RE THEY'RE CONSTRUCTED AND LIVED IN RIGHT NOW. GOTCHA. THANK YOU, MR. HIGGINS. YEAH. MY MY QUESTION WAS IN REGARDS TO THE TRAFFIC IMPACT. I KNOW THAT IT WAS STATED THAT THERE'S 1000 FEWER DAILY TRIPS. DO WE KNOW HOW MUCH THAT WAS DOWN FROM PREVIOUSLY? HALF. PLEASE. GOOD EVENING. THE TRAFFIC ENGINEER WITH THE PROJECT? 4450 WEST BOULEVARD. THE ORIGINAL FUTURE LAND USE AMENDMENT. THE CURRENT FUTURE LAND USE HAS 2000 DAILY TRIPS. THANK YOU. ALRIGHT, BOARD, YOU'VE HEARD ALL THE EVIDENCE. I'M SORRY. GO AHEAD. WELL, I'M ABOUT TO CALL. TO CALL FOR A MOTION. ALL RIGHT, MR. CHAIR. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE TREELAND MULTIFAMILY, SMALL SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT, CASE NUMBER CP25-0004. BASED ON FINDINGS THAT THE REQUEST IS CONSISTENT AND MEETS THE REVIEW CRITERIA SET FORTH BY THE CITY OF PALM BAY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. THE THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT AN UPDATED TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND STORMWATER ANALYSIS PLAN AND REVISED CONCEPT PLAN FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY TO EVALUATE THE PROPOSED RIGHT IN RIGHT OUT ACCESS CONFIGURATION AT THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT. THE UPDATED TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND STORMWATER ANALYSIS SHALL IDENTIFY ALL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS NECESSARY TO MITIGATE DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS AND MAINTAIN THE ADAPTIVE LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS, INCLUDING ANY REQUIRED OFFSITE ROADWAY ACCESS TURN LANES. PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS AND POSSIBLY STORMWATER RETENTION. THE APPLICANT SHALL. SHALL CONSTRUCT ALL IMPROVEMENTS IDENTIFIED IN THE STAFF APPROVED TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND STORMWATER ANALYSIS REPORT INCORPORATED INTO THE APPROVED SITE PLAN PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. I'LL SECOND. ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE A MOTION. AND I MEAN, WE HAVE A FIRST AND A SECOND MOTION HERE. SO ARE THERE IS THERE ANY OTHER DISCUSSION ON THIS GENTLEMAN. ALL RIGHT GENTLEMEN, I WILL CALL FOR THE VOTE. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. AYE. ALL OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. OKAY. MISS FLYNN, CASE NUMBER FD25-0002. JUST ONE SECOND. A LOT OF THEM TO CLEAR. YEAH. AND, MR. CHAIR, WHILE WE ARE WAITING FOR THAT ONE ON THIS ONE. I WOULD REQUEST THAT YOU PULL THE BOARD FOR EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS AND SITE VISITS. ALL RIGHT. HAS THERE. I MEAN, LOOKING TO SEE THAT NO ONE HAS SAID I'M GOING TO MAKE THE ASSUMPTION THAT THERE HAS NOT BEEN ANY EX PARTE COMMUNICATION OR SITE VISITS FOR THE FOR THE NEXT CASE FD25-0002. MR. CHAIR, I DID DO A SITE VISIT TO FD25-0002. THERE WAS NO REPRESENTATION, NO REPRESENTATIVES FROM DEVELOPERS AT THE SITE. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, MR. FILIBERTO. ANYONE ELSE? ALL RIGHT. SEEING NONE, MISS FLYNN. CASE NUMBER 25-00002. [00:40:02] GOOD EVENING, VICE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD. AGAIN FOR THE RECORD, DEBBIE FLYNN, ASSISTANT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR. THE ITEM FOR CONSIDERATION IS CASE FD25-0002 FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT TO THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED EMERALD LAKES WEST PHASE 2 ROCK PUD TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS FROM 233 TO 244, AN INCREASE OF 11 LOTS. THE AMENDMENT ALSO INCLUDES REVISED FINAL DESIGN GUIDELINES ESTABLISHING STANDARDS FOR THE 60 FOOT LOTS, COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT, PARKING REDUCTIONS, SWIMMING POOL SETBACKS, ACCESSORY STRUCTURES, LANDSCAPING, STREET LIGHTING AND PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENTS AND SIGNAGE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY CONSISTS OF APPROXIMATELY 829.27 ACRES, LOCATED WEST OF INTERSTATE 95 AND ON BOTH AND NORTH SOUTH OF SAINT JOHN'S HERITAGE PARKWAY SOUTHEAST. THE PROPERTY IS DESIGNATED AS A SPECIAL PLANNING AREA FOR EMERALD LAKES UNDER THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND IS ZONED REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTER, OR RAC. PORTIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT ARE ALREADY UNDER CONSTRUCTION PURSUANT TO PREVIOUSLY APPROVED FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS AND MASTER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND SUBDIVISION CONSTRUCTION PLANS. THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT DOES NOT MODIFY THE OVERALL EMERALD LAKES ENTITLEMENTS OR DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK, BUT INSTEAD FOCUSES ON REVISIONS WITHIN PHASE 2, INCLUDING AN ADDITIONAL 11 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS AND UPDATED TO THE FINAL DESIGN GUIDELINES. I'M A LITTLE BACKGROUND OF THE PROJECT. EMERALD LAKES IS AN APPROVED 1561 ACRE MIXED USE RACK LOCATED AT THE SOUTHERN INTERCHANGE OF 95 AND SAINT JOHN'S HERITAGE PARKWAY. THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT IS ENTITLED FOR UP TO 3760 RESIDENTIAL UNITS IN 2.8 02,000,000FT² OF NON RESIDENTIAL USES. EMERALD LAKES WEST PHASE 2 WAS ORIGINALLY APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL IN 2020, FOLLOWED BY EXECUTION OF THE MASTER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT IN 2021. THE CURRENT AMENDMENT PROPOSES TO ADD 11 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS, INCREASING THE TOTAL AGAIN FROM 2.33 TO 244. INTRODUCE A NEW 60 FOOT LOT PRODUCT AND REVISE THE FINAL DESIGN GUIDELINES. THE AMENDMENT DOES NOT INCREASE THE OVERALL DENSITY PERMITTED WITHIN THE RAC, NOR DOES IT ALTER THE APPROVED ROADWAY NETWORK, OPEN SPACE FRAMEWORK OR NONRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM. THIS SLIDE DEPICTS THE REVISED FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR EMERALD LAKES WEST PHASE 2 AMENDMENT 1. THE AMENDMENT MODIFIES LOT LINES WITHIN THE APPROVED URBAN LIVING AREA, WHICH IS DOWN HERE WHERE THE CIRCLE IS UP TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF SINGLE FAMILY LOTS RESULTED IN ADDITIONAL 11 LOTS UNITS. THE ROADWAY NETWORK, OPEN SPACE SYSTEM, STORMWATER FACILITIES AND UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE REMAIN SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME AS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED UNDER RESOLUTION 202037. THE AMENDMENT CONTINUES TO REMAIN BELOW THE OVERALL EMERALD LAKES RAC MAXIMUM DENSITY OF 3760, THE RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS AND 2.8 2,000,000FT² OF NON RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT UPDATES THE FINAL DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR EMERALD LAKES WEST PHASE2 TO REFLECT SEVERAL MODIFICATIONS REQUESTED BY THE APPLICANT. THE CHANGES INCLUDE INCORPORATING STANDARDS FOR THE 60 FOOT SINGLE FAMILY LOT PRODUCT, WHICH PROVIDES ADDITIONAL HOUSING OPTIONS WITHIN THE URBAN LIVING DISTRICT WHILE REMAINING BELOW THE OVERALL RAC MAXIMUM DENSITY. THE AMENDMENT ALSO PERMITTED. PERMITTED. COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL USES FOR THE MIXED USE TOWN CENTER AND WORKPLACE DISTRICTS, ESTABLISHING PARKING CRITERIA AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ANY PROPOSED PARKING REDUCTIONS AND UPDATES, SETBACKS REQUIREMENTS FOR POOLS, POOL PUMP EQUIPMENT AND ACCESSORY STRUCTURES. ADDITIONAL REVISIONS INCLUDE UPDATES TO THE APPROVED TREE SPECIES LISTS STREET LIGHTING STANDARDS WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PROCESSES AND SIGNAGE STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL, NONRESIDENTIAL AND INTERSTATE BILLBOARD INTERCHANGE SIGNS. THESE CHANGES ARE INTENDED ONLY TO CLARIFY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND PROVIDE GREATER FLEXIBILITY, WHILE MAINTAINING CONSISTENCY WITH THE OVERALL CHARACTER OF THE EMERALD LAKES REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTER. A VIRTUAL CITIZEN PARTICIPATION MEETING WAS HELD IN JUNE PURSUANT TO SECTION 17202, 1 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. NO PUBLIC COMMENTS OR CONCERNS WERE RECEIVED AND ALL REQUIRED PUBLIC NOTICES WERE PROPERLY COMPLETED. STAFF REVIEWED THE APPLICATION UNDER THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN CRITERIA CONTAINED IN SECTION 172031.D OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. [00:45:01] THE REVIEW INCLUDED SUBDIVISION AND ZONING COMPLIANCE, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONSISTENCY, CHARACTER OF DEVELOPMENT, DENSITY AND INTENSITY, TRANSPORTATION, CIRCULATION, UTILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE, OPEN SPACE, ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES AND CONSISTENCY WITH THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. SUBMITTED MATERIALS INCLUDE THE APPLICATION AND THE PROJECT NARRATIVE. REVISED FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN SHEETS. UPDATED FINAL DESIGN GUIDELINES, THE BUILDING USE RESTRICTION TABLE, A TRIP GENERATION MEMO AND UTILITY INFORMATION. THE CITIZEN PARTICIPATION REPORT AND SUPPORTING EXHIBITS AND DOCUMENTATION. TO CLARIFY, THEY PROVIDED EVERYTHING THAT WAS REQUIRED REQUIRED FOR THEIR FDP AMENDMENT. STAFF'S ANALYSIS INDICATES THAT THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT COMPLIES WITH APPLICABLE SUBDIVISION AND ZONING REGULATIONS AND REMAINS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND EMERALD LAKES SITE SPECIFIC CRITERIA. THE AMENDMENT IS A SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMITY WITH THE APPROVED PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN, AS IT DOES NOT ALTER THE APPROVED ROADWAY NETWORK, OPEN SPACE SYSTEM OR UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE. THE ADDITION OF THE 11 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS INCREASES THE APPROVED PHASE TWO TOTAL TO 2192 DWELLING UNITS, WHICH REMAIN BELOW THE OVERALL RAC MAXIMUM OF 3760. AS A RESULT, NO AMENDMENT TO THE MASTER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT IS REQUIRED. PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD IS REQUESTED TO PROVIDE A RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE PROPOSED FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT. FOLLOWING THE BOARD'S RECOMMENDATION, THE APPLICATION WILL PROCEED TO CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL CONSIDERATION AND ACTION. AND ON THE SCREEN. BOARD ACTION REQUESTS TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OR DENIAL. AND STOPS HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. THE BOARD HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF. AND THE APPLICANT IS HERE TO PRESENT AS WELL. GOOD AFTERNOON. BRENDA YATES 6045 SOUTHWEST 64TH PLACE SOUTH MIAMI FLORIDA 33143. I'M THE PROJECT PLANNER FOR EMERALD LAKES AND I FIRST CAME BEFORE YOU IN 2010. IT'S BEEN A VERY LONG TIME. SO FIRST THING I WANT TO DO WAS SHOW JUST A FEW SUMMARY BACKGROUND SLIDES. AND I ALSO HAVE JOE NAGY WITH CEG, OUR ENGINEER AND BOJANA BROWN, WHO REPRESENTATIVE OF LENNAR, IF WE WANT TO GET INTO ANY HOUSE DETAILS, THAT WOULD BE HER. REALLY WHAT I WANTED TO TELL YOU WAS THAT ORIGINALLY IN 2010, WE HAD 2 PROJECTS, ONE ON THE WEST SIDE OF I-95 AND 1 ON THE EAST SIDE OF 95. IT WAS 800 ACRES AND 700 ACRES. AND SO AS WE WERE TALKING THROUGH THE STATE AND THROUGH THE STAFF OF THE PROJECT, WE DECIDED WE COULD COMBINE IT. AND SO IN 2010, WE STARTED GETTING WE GOT OUR RAC AND WE CREATED THE NEW REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTER COMP PLAN DESIGNATION AND THE ZONING DESIGNATION AT THE TIME WITH STAFF. SO WE CREATED SOMETHING THAT WE COULD USE TO BE ABLE TO BUILD THIS TYPE OF PRODUCT AT THE INTERCHANGE AND KEEP IT CONCENTRATED AT THE INTERCHANGE. SO 2010, WE GOT THE RAC DONE, 2011 WE DID OUR ZONING CONCEPT PLANS. THEN IN 2018. WE REZONED IT ALL INTO ONE, AND IN 2019 WE DID THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR PHASE 1 TO START DOING THE MASTER INFRASTRUCTURE. SO IN 2021, WE GOT A MASTER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE WHOLE PROJECT, BOTH SIDES. AND THEN IN 2025, WE GOT A MASTER UTILITY AGREEMENT. SO THE REASON IT'S TAKEN SO LONG IS BECAUSE BY THE TIME WE WORKED OUT THE INTERCHANGE AND HOW IT WENT OVER TO DOT AND WE DONATED ALL THE THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR SAINT JOHN'S HERITAGE PARKWAY AND FOR THE INTERCHANGE. AND WE WORKED WITH THE CITY TO GET THEIR UTILITY MASTER PLANTS IN LINE. THAT'S HOW LONG IT TOOK US TO GET OUR MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND MASTER WATER AND SEWER AGREEMENT DONE. 2025 SO NOW WE'RE HERE. AND WE DID IN 2020, THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER 2, WHICH IS THIS WEST SIDE. IT'S 800 ACRES AND WE HAD 2182 UNITS. WE WANTED TO ADD 11. LENNAR PURCHASED IN 2025 THE RESIDENTIAL PARCELS FROM THE DEVELOPER. SO THEY TOOK THIS CORNER. AND THEN I'LL SHOW YOU IF WE GET THE OTHER MAP UP. [00:50:03] THEY ALSO TOOK THE PARCELS THAT ARE WHITE. ON THE NORTH SIDE THERE'S 443 UNITS. THEY'RE RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE FAMILY LOTS. AND THEN ON THE ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEY HAVE ANOTHER 445 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS. SO WE HAVE THE 4 CORNERS OF THE INTERCHANGE WITH THE MASTER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. WE ALSO, BESIDES PROVIDING THE UTILITIES, PROVIDING THE RIGHT OF WAY, WE DO HAVE TO BRING ALL THE UTILITIES INTO THE PROJECT, WHICH IS CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION. WE ALSO HAVE ALL THE MASTER PERMITS DONE FOR THE WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT AND THE CORE, AND THROUGH THE CITY AND THE COUNTY FOR MASTER CONCEPT PLAN FOR THE WHOLE PROJECT AND THEN EXCUSE ME. SO THEN WE COME BACK TO JUST THIS PHASE. THE 11 LOTS WE'RE LOOKING AT AGAIN, AS DEBBIE MENTIONED, IS IN THE CORNER. WE HAVE A TOTAL PROJECT OF 37 60 AND OUR PHASING WILL BE STARTING AS WE DON'T HAVE IT. IT IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION. THEY'VE GOT THE, THE UTILITIES, THE LAND DEVELOPMENT WORK IS DONE AND SOME OF THE HOUSES ARE STARTING TO GO UP ON THE FIRST PHASE. SO IF YOU GO OUT THERE TO LOOK, YOU'LL SEE THAT IT'S UNDER CONSTRUCTION AS WELL AS THE INFRASTRUCTURE ON THE NORTH SIDE IS ALSO UNDER CONSTRUCTION FOR THE NEXT PHASE. I THINK THAT WAS WHAT I WAS REALLY ALL I WAS GOING TO TELL YOU IS IT'S UNDER CONSTRUCTION. WE'RE ADDING THE 11 LOTS BECAUSE WE HAD 40 FOOT LOTS, 50 FOOT LOTS AND 75 FOOT LOTS. AND LENNAR WANTED TO ADD ALSO ANOTHER PRODUCT IN 60 FOOT LOTS. SO THAT GIVES US 4 DIFFERENT PRODUCTS FOR THOSE 244 LOTS. AND THAT'S ALL I HAVE FOR YOU. IF YOU'D LIKE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE LET ME KNOW. DO I UNDERSTAND THAT WE'RE ONLY LOOKING AT 11 ADDITIONAL LOTS TONIGHT, CORRECT? ONLY 11. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? I HAVE ONE QUESTION. WOULD THESE ADDITIONAL 11 ADDITIONAL LOTS BACK UP TO THE SCRUB SANCTUARY OR IS ON THE OTHER SIDE. OKAY. OTHER SIDE. THANK YOU. AND SINCE YOU MENTIONED THAT WE HAVE ALREADY DONATED A CONSERVATION EASEMENT FOR THE ABOUT 300 ACRES ON THE NORTH SIDE. AND EACH OF OUR WETLAND AREAS ARE ALREADY IN A MASTER CONCEPT PLAN PERMIT. SO EACH OF THOSE DO GET EITHER CONSERVATION AREAS OR, OR RESTRICTIONS PUT ON ALL THE WETLAND AREAS. THANK YOU. YOU'RE WELCOME. GOOD SIR. ARE THEY, ARE THESE ANY OF THESE GOING TO BE RENTALS? ARE THEY ALL SINGLE FAMILY FOR SALE. OKAY. THANK YOU. OKAY. THANK YOU. YOU'RE WELCOME. OKAY. MOVING ON. SO NO MORE QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD. SO I'M GOING TO OPEN UP THE OPEN UP FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS. SO ANYONE THAT'S IN FAVOR OF THIS PROJECT, IF YOU CAN COME FORWARD, MR. BATTEN. BILL BATTEN 586 OCEAN SPRAY STREET, SOUTHWEST. THE ONLY REASON I'M IN FAVOR OF THIS IS THEY'VE BEEN WORKING OUT SO LONG, THEY'VE ALREADY BEEN APPROVED WITH SO MUCH OF THEIR STUFF, AND THEY'VE ALREADY INSTALLED SO MUCH OF THEIR INFRASTRUCTURE AND DONE A MASSIVE OUTLAY. THAT'S WHY I DON'T WANT TO SEE THEIR PROJECT FAIL. THAT'S THAT'S IT. BUT WITH THAT BILL BATTEN BEING WHO HE IS, HE'S ALWAYS GOT A NEGATIVE TO COINCIDE WITH THE POSITIVE. RIGHT. BILL BATTEN HAS BEEN FOLLOWING EMERALD CITY FOR A LONG, LONG TIME. MY DOCUMENTS THAT I GO BACK AND REVIEW BEFORE I CAME HERE TONIGHT WERE SIGNED BY MAYOR MAZZIOTTI. THAT'S HOW LONG I'VE BEEN REVIEWING AND FOLLOWING THIS PROJECT. RIGHT. BUT IT BRINGS UP A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS. ONE WAS ORDINANCE 201146, PAGE 8, EXPIRATION EXPIRATION DATE. AND SINCE IT'S TAKEN SO LONG, WHEN YOU PUT A CLAUSE IN A CONTRACT, I'M JUST THE ONE THAT'S GOING TO GO FIND THAT CLAUSE. AND IT SAYS EXPIRATION DATE IF IT'S NOT MET WILL RENDER CONCEPT PLAN NULL AND VOID. BUT I'M ASSUMING SINCE WE'RE NO LONGER IN A CONCEPT PLAN AND WE'RE IN AN ACTUAL PLAN NOW, THAT WILL BE NOT APPROPRIATE, WHICH I WAS NOT AWARE OF. SO BILL BATTEN MADE A MISTAKE. ITEM NUMBER 3 IS COMPLETION OF THE SAINT JOHN'S HERITAGE PARKWAY, RIGHT? EMERALD LAKES IS PART OF THE TRIAD THAT'S TRYING TO GET FROM WHAT IS IT FROM BABCOCK ALL THE WAY OVER TO MICCO ROAD. THEY'RE PART OF THE TRIAD THAT'S SUPPOSED TO BE PUTTING THAT ROAD IN. [00:55:01] ALL I SEE WITH THIS PANEL OF 11 MORE HOME SITES IS THEY'RE GOING TO GET THE BUILDERS GOING TO GET WHAT THEY WANT, BUT I DON'T SEE ANY MOVEMENT TOWARDS THE OTHER SIDE OF THEIR CONTRACTS, CONCEPT OF THEIR PLANS AND AGREEMENTS OF CONNECTING THE INTERSTATE TO MICCO ROAD. I DON'T SEE ANYTHING THAT WAS TALKING ABOUT HOW THEY'RE GOING TO HELP MAKE THAT HAPPEN. AND OF COURSE, THE OTHER ONE IS I COULDN'T FIGURE OUT WHETHER THE NEW CONCEPT OR WHERE THE NEW SITES WERE GOING TO BE WHEN I WAS LOOKING AT THE PACKET, BUT I SAID, WELL, WHERE IS THIS LAGOON AND HOTEL GOING TO BE? OR IS IT COMPLETELY GONE NOW? BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT WAS PRESENTED TO GET US TO. PRESENT THIS OVERALL TO THE CITY. RIGHT. AND THE OTHER ONE. DOES ANYONE HAVE A NEW, BETTER UPDATE FOR THE ENTIRE PROJECT, OTHER THAN THIS SEVEN YEAR OLD SHEET THAT I HAVE TO KEEP LOOKING AT? IF YOU HAVE ONE. RIGHT. THAT'S IT. BUT I AM IN FAVOR OF THEM PROCEEDING GETTING THEIR 11 NEW SITES. BUT LET'S GO AHEAD AND MAKE THE CONTRACTOR STAY COMMITTED TO THEIR BUILD OUT TO HELP THE CITY OF PALM BAY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU SIR. ANYONE ELSE WANT TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE PROJECT? ALL RIGHT. ANYONE IN OPPOSITION THAT WOULD LIKE TO MAKE COMMENTS ABOUT THE PROJECT? WOW. SEEING NONE, I'M GOING TO ALLOW THE APPLICANT TO COME UP AND DO A REBUTTAL, IF YOU WOULD LIKE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR MR. BATTEN'S QUESTIONS. YES, 20 1146 DOES HAVE AN EXPIRATION DATE. ONCE THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS ISSUED, THEN THAT OVERSEES THE THE CONCEPT PLAN GETS REDONE, AND THEN THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND THE EXPIRATION DATE IS NOT REQUIRED. NUMBER 2 THE ROAD TO MICCO STAY TUNED. THEN I'LL BE HERE PROBABLY THREE MORE TIMES THE NEXT 2 MONTHS BECAUSE WE HAVE APPLICATIONS COMING IN FOR EACH OF THESE AREAS CONTINUING, ESPECIALLY GOING TO THE EAST SIDE, WHICH IS WHAT HE'S TALKING ABOUT IS SAINT JOHN'S HERITAGE PARKWAY GOING ALL THE WAY DOWN TO MICCO ROAD AND TO YOUR OTHER DEVELOPMENTS TO THE SOUTH OVER THERE TO THE EAST. SO WE WILL HAVE WE HAVE ACTUALLY 2 AN APPLICATION ALREADY IN FOR THE SOUTHEAST QUADRANT, AND THAT WILL BRING IN ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR SAINT JOHN'S HERITAGE PARKWAY CONSTRUCTION AND INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS. SO YOU'LL SEE THAT NEXT DOESN'T APPLY TO THIS. NUMBER 3, THE SAME THING. WE HAVE COMMERCIAL OFFICE BUSINESS, RETAIL CENTERS IN ALL 4 QUADRANTS. THIS PARTICULAR PLAN DOESN'T COVER THAT, BUT YOU WILL SEE THOSE IN FUTURE APPLICATIONS. THE 4 MASTER PLAN. I WILL SEND YOU A MASTER PLAN AND ANYONE THAT NEEDS AN UPDATED MASTER PLAN. OBVIOUSLY, THE STAFF ALSO HAS MASTER PLANS ONLINE AND THERE IS ALSO A WEBSITE, EMERALDLAKES.COM, THAT YOU CAN GO TO AND YOU'LL GET ALL THE INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT. THAT'S IT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? MR. CATALANO? YEAH, I DO. I ALMOST FEEL A LITTLE SILLY ASKING THIS QUESTION BECAUSE I IMAGINE THAT THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED A LONG TIME AGO. IT'S JUST WE'RE ONLY TALKING ABOUT 11 LOTS FOR A MASSIVE PROJECT. HAS THERE BEEN ANY FIRE OR POLICE STUDIES DONE TO ACCOMMODATE, IS A HUGE DEVELOPMENT. YES, ACTUALLY THERE ARE. AND THE DEVELOPER IS IN NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE FIRE AND POLICE DEPARTMENT, AND WE HAVE HAD A SITE DESIGNATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PARKWAY AND HAVE OFFERED THAT THROUGH MANY DEVELOPMENTS AND CITY MANAGERS AND FIRE CHIEFS AND POLICE DEPARTMENTS. SO THEY, WE'VE OFFERED IT AS A, AS A SITE FOR THEM AND THEY'VE BEEN BACK AND FORTH PICKING OUT WHICH SITES THEY WANT ON THIS SIDE OR ON THE EAST SIDE OF 95. SO IT HAS BEEN OFFERED AND STUDY HAS BEEN DONE AND IT'S AWESOME. IS THAT, IS THAT THAT'S GOING TO BE A SUBSTATION OR A BIG ONE, A BIG ONE? OKAY. GOOD, GOOD. YEAH. IT'S GOT EVERYTHING. SO WE'LL JUST, I THINK THEY'RE WORKING ON, ON TIMING, HOW TO DO IT, BUYING, LEASING, BUILDING. WE'VE MADE ALL THOSE OFFERS TO THEM. OKAY. SO HOW ABOUT POLICE IF. THEY SAY THEY CAN BE IN THE SAME BUILDING. AWESOME. THANK YOU. YOU'RE WELCOME. WOULD YOU LIKE TO. I MEAN, YOU WERE LOOKING AT THE PODIUM LIKE YOU WERE READY TO GO UP THERE. NO, NO. DO YOU HAVE ANY OTHER. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. WELL, BOARD THEM UP CLOSE. THE PUBLIC COMMENTS. BRING IT BACK TO THE BOARD BOARD. GENTLEMEN, I NEED A MOTION. MR. CHAIR. YES, SIR. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE EMERALD LAKES WEST PHASE 2, FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. AMENDMENT NUMBER 1. CASE NUMBER FD26-0002. BASED ON FINDINGS THAT THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE WITH AND MEETS THE [01:00:07] REVIEW CRITERIA SET FORTH IN PALM BAY CITY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AND WE MADE REMAINS IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMITY WITH THE APPROVED PDP. SECOND. ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE A WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. IS THERE, ARE THERE ANY ANY ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION, GENTLEMEN? SEEING NONE. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE AYE AYE. ALL OPPOSED? OKAY. MOTION CARRIES. CONGRATULATIONS. MR. CHAIR, JUST FOR CLARIFICATION. YES, MA'AM. THE CASE NUMBER CORRECTLY? YES, MA'AM. I THINK THE CASE NUMBER ON THE AGENDA IS 25-0002. I HEARD I HEARD 26. THAT'S NEXT MONTH. BUT I THINK IT'S CLEAR FROM THE RECORD WHAT PROJECT WE WERE APPROVING. I JUST WOULD YOU WOULD YOU LIKE FOR HIM TO GO BACK AND RESTATE THE MOTION? LET ME RESTATE THE I DON'T THINK THAT'S NECESSARY. I JUST WANTED TO CLARIFY THE RECORD FOR THE RECORD. THE CASE NUMBER TO CLARIFY, FOR THE RECORD, IT WAS FD25-00002. THANK YOU SIR. AND MY APOLOGIES. NO MA'AM. YOU GOT TO KEEP US ON OUR TOES. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT WE'RE GOING TO GO. GENTLEMEN YOU WANT TO TAKE A BREAK? QUICK LITTLE 5 MINUTE BREAK. THEN WE'RE GOING TO MOVE OVER TO THE NEXT TO OUR NEXT AGENDA ITEM, WHICH IS A PRETTY BIG ITEM. SO HOW ABOUT WE TAKE 5. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT, GENTLEMEN, LET'S LET'S CALL THIS MEETING BACK TO ORDER. OUR FINAL ORDER OF BUSINESS FOR TONIGHT IS THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD. [OTHER BUSINESS:] ZONING BOARD, CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR TERMS. LET'S SEE, HOW DO WE EVEN BEGIN WITH THIS ONE? MR. FILIBERTO, SINCE. YOU. SURE? THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. SO THE REASON WHY I KIND OF BROUGHT THIS UP I SAW OUR ROSTER LAST MEETING. AND THEN I SEEN OUR BYLAWS NOW, WHERE A CHAIR AND A VICE CHAIR IS ELECTED. THE CHAIR SERVES FOR 2 YEARS AND IS AUTOMATICALLY SUCCEEDED BY THE VICE CHAIR. SO BASICALLY, IT'S A FOUR YEAR TERM ON ONE VOTE. I'VE NEVER REALLY SEEN THAT BEFORE IN ANY OTHER BOARDS I'VE BEEN ON. USUALLY THEY'VE BEEN A YEAR OR 2. AND THEN A REELECTION FOR A CHAIR OR VICE CHAIR. SO I WANTED TO BRING IT UP TO THIS BOARD TO KIND OF CHANGE THAT. THAT THAT'S, THAT'S REASON NUMBER 1. REASON NUMBER 2, AND THIS IS NO DISRESPECT TO YOU, MR. CHAIR. WHEN WE ELECTED THE CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR THAT WE CURRENTLY HAVE, IT WAS THE BOARD WAS THIN THEN WE DIDN'T HAVE ALL OUR MEMBERS PRESENT WHERE WE HAVE ALL OUR MEMBERS HERE TODAY. I KNOW MR. NORRIS WASN'T HERE, MR. CATALANO, ETC.. ALL WE HAD WAS MYSELF, MCNALLY YOU AND IN THE CURRENT CHAIR. SO THAT'S KIND OF THE REASON WHY I WANTED TO BRING IT UP AGAIN. KIND OF MY IDEA WAS TO DO AN ELECTION EVERY JANUARY FOR A CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR. I KNOW YOU BROUGHT UP THE POINT THAT THE, THE SAME CHAIR KEPT WINNING. YOU KNOW, THE, THE BREVARD COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD THEY'VE HAD THE SAME CHAIR AS WELL FOR ABOUT 4 YEARS. HOWEVER, THEY HAVE AN ELECTION EVERY YEAR AND THEY KEEP ELECTING THE SAME CHAIR. AND I GUESS THAT GUY'S GOOD, BUT EITHER WAY THAT'S WHY I WANT TO BRING THIS UP DISCUSSION TO THE BOARD AND SEE HOW THE BOARD FELT ABOUT IT. ALL RIGHT, SO WHAT I'M GOING TO NEED IS BECAUSE THIS IS THE THIS IS A DISCUSSION AND WE'RE IN THIS KIND OF ON THE RECORD AND OFF THE RECORD, BUT I NEED EVERYONE'S INPUT. SO I REALLY WOULD APPRECIATE EVERYONE'S INPUT ON HOW YOU FEEL ABOUT THIS. I GUESS I JUST NEED TO UNDERSTAND A LITTLE MORE THE I THOUGHT THIS POSITION WAS APPOINTED TO, I GUESS, DO WE HAVE AN ELECTION FOR FOR EACH MEMBER? IT IS A NOMINATION. SO IF YOU NOMINATE THE CHAIR AND THE VICE CHAIR. YEAH, USUALLY, I GUESS AFTER 4 YEARS AND AT THIS CURRENT TERM, BUT WE, WE NOMINATED THE CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR WHEN THERE WAS ONLY 4 PEOPLE HERE. AND NOW WE USUALLY HAVE NOW WE HAVE LIKE 6 OR 7. SO THAT WAS THE REASON WHY I WANTED TO BRING IT UP. YEAH. YEAH, I CONCUR, I THINK THAT'S A BIT TOO INFREQUENT. I THINK THAT YEARLY ELECTIONS FOR BOTH CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR IS A GOOD IDEA. IS THAT SEPARATE ELECTIONS? SO YOU'RE YOU'RE ELECTING THE CHAIRS 1 OR 2 OR IS IT LIKE PRESIDENT, [01:05:04] VICE PRESIDENT. I'M JUST TRYING TO UNDERSTAND. IT IS A SEPARATE ELECTIONS. YOU WOULD ELECT A CHAIR AND THEN YOU WOULD ELECT A VICE CHAIR. I'M CURIOUS IF IF STAFF HAS ANY INPUT ON WHETHER IT'S, THERE'S ANY ADVANTAGE TO THE COUNTY HOSTING ANNUAL ANNUAL ELECTIONS VERSUS US DOING IT ON A LONGER TERM BASIS. IF LIKE THAT, CONTINUITY IS MORE IMPORTANT ON A LOCAL LEVEL. GOOD QUESTION. MISTER CHAIR, IF I MAY THIS THE THIS IS PART OF THE BYLAWS THAT THAT ARE ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD. SO IT IS UP TO YOU ALL. THIS POWER HAS BEEN DEDICATED TO YOU BY CODE TO DETERMINE WHAT YOUR BYLAWS ARE. SO HAVING SAID THAT, IT'S NOT UNUSUAL TO SEE ONE YEAR TERMS THAT, THAT I WOULD SAY HAVING SERVED BEFORE VARIOUS PLANNING AND ZONING BOARDS, THAT'S THE NORM. AS OPPOSED TO THE PROCESS THAT WE HAVE HERE, BUT AGAIN, ENTIRELY UP TO THE PLEASURE OF THE BOARD. WE'LL TAKE WHATEVER DIRECTION YOU GIVE AND WE'LL WE'LL COME BACK WITH A DOCUMENT THAT REFLECTS THAT. ALL RIGHT. WELL, LIKE I'VE STATED BEFORE, AND JUST LIKE MR. FILIBERTO, JUST JUST STATED THE ONE OF THE, ONE OF THE ISSUES I'VE SEEN SINCE I'VE SERVED ON DIFFERENT BOARDS HAS, HAVE BEEN THE, THE NOMINATION AND THE ELECTION OF THE SAME MEMBER THAT WHERE HE ENDS UP ON THAT, ON THAT BOARD OR IN THAT CHAIR FOR CLOSE ANYWHERE BETWEEN 4 TO 6 YEARS. AND I THINK THAT THAT DOES THAT, THAT DO NOT ALLOW FOR ANY OTHER MEMBER TO BE ABLE TO, TO SHARE IN THE WONDERFUL EXPERIENCE OF BEING ABLE TO CHAIR OR VICE CHAIR A MEETING. SO I. ARE YOU LOOKING FOR AN EXIT? I'VE ALREADY WRITTEN IT OUT. NO, I'M JUST NO, I THIS DEDICATION. SO I'M IN AGREEMENT. I'M, I'M, I, I, I THINK THAT WE ALL THAT, THAT WE SHOULD, I THINK THAT IT'S POSSIBLE THAT WE SHOULD MAYBE MOVE TO HAVE A MEETING. I MEAN, HAVE A ELECTION AT LEAST ONCE OR ONCE EVERY JANUARY OR ONCE A YEAR. AND AGAIN, BECAUSE WE DIDN'T HAVE A, WE DIDN'T HAVE A, A BOARD WITH, WITH THIS MANY MEMBERS THAT WERE CONSISTENT. SO I THINK IT WOULD BE ONLY FAIR TO OTHER MEMBERS TO, TO, TO BE ABLE TO VOTE, TO BE ABLE TO BE CHAIR, VICE CHAIR. I APPRECIATE THAT, MISTER CHAIR, BECAUSE THIS IS UNCOMFORTABLE. YOU KNOW YOU DO A GREAT JOB AND EVERYTHING LIKE THAT. BUT I JUST FEEL THAT THE, THE CONSECUTIVE, LET'S CALL IT A 4 YEAR TERM BECAUSE IT'S THE CHAIR AND THE VICE CHAIR THERE. SOME MEMBERS MAY NOT EVEN BE HERE 4 YEARS FROM NOW. WHEREAS IF THEY WANT TO GET A, A CHAIR OPPORTUNITY IN AND THEY ONLY HAVE A SHORT TIME SPAN HERE, THEY CAN GET IT IN. WHEREAS RIGHT NOW I FEEL LIKE WE HAVE LESS OPTIONS NOW THAN WE DO IF WE CHANGE IT. THAT'S MY HONEST OPINION. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO HAVE A YEARLY ELECTION FOR THE CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD. I WILL SECOND THAT. AND, MR. CATALANO, IF YOU DON'T MIND, IF WE DO HAVE A TIME FRAME. COULD IT BE JANUARY? EVERY JANUARY THE P&Z HAS A A ELECTION FOR CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR. YEAH. I'LL AMEND THAT TO TO HAPPEN IN JANUARY. AND I'LL SECOND THAT. SO WE WE HAVE TO HAVE THE BYLAWS CHANGED THEN FOR THE. ALL RIGHT. SO SHOULD THIS BE FURTHER DISCUSSION FOR FOR WHEN THE CHAIR ACTUALLY GETS HERE. AND AND WE'RE STILL MISSING ONE OTHER MEMBER. SO MR. CHAIR, THIS WAS ACTUALLY IT WAS LISTED AS A DISCUSSION ITEM FOR TONIGHT. WHAT WE WILL NEED TO DO IS ACTUALLY AMEND THE DOCUMENT THAT IS YOUR BYLAWS. AND WE WILL BRING THAT BACK TO THE BOARD FOR FORMAL ADOPTION. AT THE NEXT AVAILABLE MEETING. AND AT THAT TIME YOU WILL VOTE TO FORMALLY ADOPT IT. BUT AT THIS TIME, BASED ON THE CONSENSUS THAT I HEARD, I THINK WE HAVE OUR DIRECTION. THANK YOU. AND A QUESTION ON THAT IS IT IS IT 1 READING OR IS IT 2 READINGS FOR TO ADOPT A BYLAW? IT IT IS 1. IT'S IT'S NOT AN ORDINANCE. OKAY. THANK YOU. SHOULD BE ONE READING. OKAY. GOOD. ALL RIGHT GENTLEMEN, VERY PRODUCTIVE MEETING TONIGHT. I APPRECIATE YOU ALL COMING OUT AND GIVING YOUR OPINIONS AND YOUR VOTES. [01:10:02] AND I HOPE YOU ALL HAVE A WONDERFUL AND SAFE 4TH OF JULY. AND HEY. MEETING'S ADJOURNED. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.